Quo Vadis Open data?

Jozef Andraško, Matúš Mesarčík


New technologies have irreversibly changed the nature of the traditional way of exercising the right to free access to information. In the current information society, the information available to public authorities is not just a tool for controlling the public administration and increasing its transparency. Information has become an asset that individuals and legal entities also seek to use for business purposes. PSI particularly in form of open data create new opportunities for developing and improving the performance of public administration.

In that regard, authors analyze the term open data and its legal framework from the perspective of European Union law, Slovak legal order and Czech legal order. Furthermore, authors focus is on the relation between open data regime, public sector information re-use regime and free access to information regime.

New data protection regime represented by General Data Protection Regulation poses several challenges when it comes to processing of public sector information in form of open data. The article highlights the most important challenges of new regime being compliance with purpose specification, selection of legal ground and other important issues.


Data Protection; GDPR; Open Data; PSI Directive; Public Sector Information

Full Text:


Show references Hide references

[1] Act No. 101/2000 Coll., On the protection of personal data and on the amendment on some acts. Czech Republic. In Czech.

[2] Act No. 106/1999 Coll., On Free Access to Information as amended. Czech Republic. In Czech.

[3] Act No. 18/2018 Coll., On Protection of Personal Data and on Changing and amending of other acts.Slovakia. In Slovak.

[4] Act No. 211/2000 Coll., On Free Access to Information and on changes and amendments to certain acts. Slovakia. In Slovak.

[5] Action Plan of the Initiative for Open Government in the Slovak Republic for 2017–2019. [online] Available from: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/sites/default/files/Slovakia_NAP_2017-2019_EN.pdf [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[6] Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion 03/2013 on purpose limitation. [online] Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion- recommendation/files/2013/wp203_en.pdf. [Accessed 3 March 2018].

[7] Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion 06/2013 on open data and public sector information ('PSI') reuse, p. 20. [online] Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ article-29/documentation/opinionrecommendation/files/2013/wp207_en.pdf [Accessed 3 March 2018].

[8] Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion 06/2014 on the notion of legitimate interests of the data controller under Article 7 of Directive 95/46/EC, p. 25. [online] Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinionrecommendation/files/2014/wp217_en.pdf [Accessed 3 March 2018].

[9] Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32 (4), pp. 399–418.

[10] Borgesius, F.Z., Gray, J., Eechoud, M.V. (2015). Open Data, Privacy, and Fair Information Principles: Towards a Balancing Framework. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 30, pp. 2073–2132.

[11] Boseley, S. UK heart operation death rates fall after data published. The Guardian. [online] Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/jul/30/heart-surgery- death-rates-fall [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[12] Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 26 October 2012 (2012/C 326/02). [online] Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12012P%2FTXT [Accessed 18 August 2018].

[13] Creating value through open data. [online]Available from: https://www.europeandataport al.eu/sites/default/files/edp_creating_value_through_open_data [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[14] Crimereports.com. [online]Available from: https://www.crimereports.com/agency/santacruzpd [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[15] Data.europa.eu. [online]Available from: https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[16] Datasety.Data.gov.sk.[online]Available from: https://data.gov.sk/dataset [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[17] Dawes, S., & Helbig, N. (2010). Information strategies for open government: Challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency. Electronic Government, 6228, pp. 50–60.

[18] Digital single market – Slovakia. [online]Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/scoreboard/slovakia [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[19] Digital single market open data.[online]Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/open-data[Accessed 20 September 2018].

[20] Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information. Official Journal of the European Union (2003/L345/90). 31 December. [online] Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex:32003L0098 [Accessed 3 March 2018].

[21] Directive 2013/37/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information Text with EEA relevance. Official Journal of the European Union (2013/L1751/1) 27 June. [online] Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32013L0037 [Accessed 3 March 2018].

[22] Directive 95/46/EC of the of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Official Journal of the European Union (1995/L 281/31). 23 November. [online] Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31995L0046&from=EN:PDF [Accessed 3 March 2018].

[23] Djankov, S. – La Porta, R. – Lopez-de-Silanes, F. – Schleifer, A (2009). Disclosure by Politicians. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pp. 179–209.

[24] Explanatory Memorandum to the OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data. Section 54. [online] Available from: http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/oecdguidelinesontheprotectionofprivacyandtransborderflowsofpersonaldata.htm#memorandum [Accessed 3 March 2018].

[25] Geiger, CH., P., Von Lucke, J. (2012) Open Government and (Linked) (Open) (Government) (Data). JeDEM, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 265–278.

[26] Global Open Data Index: Survey. [online]Available from: http://global.census.okfn.org/[Accessed 20 September 2018].

[27] Guidelines on recommended standard licences, datasets and charging for the reuse of documents 2014/C 240/01. [online]Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2014.240.01.0001.01.ENG [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[28] Government Order No. 425/2016 Coll., On the list of information published as open data. Slovakia. In Slovak. [online] Available from: http://www.epi.sk/zzcr/2016-425 [Accessed 9 March 2018].

[29] History – International Open Data Charter. [online]Available from: http://opendatacharter.net/history/# [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[30] Huijboom, N., & Van den Broek, T. (2011). Open data: an international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice, pp. 1–13.

[31] Janssen, K. (2011). The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments. Government. Information Quarterly, 28, pp. 446–456.

[32] Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29, pp. 258–268.

[33] KohoVolit.eu. [online] Available from: http://kohovolit.eu [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[34] LAPSI 2. Thematic Network – D2 – Position paper access to data. [online] Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=8341 [Accessed 10 August 2018].

[35] LAPSI Working Group 2 Privacy aspects of PSI. [online] Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?action=display&doc_id=8366 [Accessed 10 August 2018].

[36] Legislation.gov.uk.[online]Available from: hhttp://www.legislation.gov.uk/ [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[37] Live map of London Underground. [online]Available from: http://traintimes.org.uk/map/tube/ [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[38] Londondatastore.[online]Availablefrom:http://data.london.gov.uk/[Accessed 20 September 2018].

[39]Materiál programu rokovania. Rokovania.sk. [online]Available from: http://www.rokovania.sk/Rokovanie.aspx/BodRokovaniaDetail?idMaterial=25951 [Accessed 6 March 2018].

[40] Mann, S. (2004). Sousveillance: Inverse Surveillance in Multimedia Imaging. Computer Engineering, p. 620–627. [online] Available from: http://wearcam.org/acmmm2004sousveillance/mann.pdf [Accessed 3 March 2018].

[41] Munk, R. (2017) Attempt to increase the transparency. Bratislava law review, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 167–173.

[42] Myška, M. et al. (2014) Veřejné licence v České republice. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 192 p.

[43] National Concept of Informatization of Public Administration of the Slovak Republic for the years 2016–2020.

[44] O nás. Data.gov.sk. [online]Available from: https://data.gov.sk/about [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[45] Olejár, D. et al. (2015) Manažment informačnej bezpečnosti a základy PKI. Bratislava, 175 p.

[46] Open Knowledge Foundation: The Open Data Manual (2011). [online] Available from: http://opendatahandbook.org/ [Accessed 1 March 2018].

[47] Otvorené zmluvy. [online]Available from: http://otvorenezmluvy.sk [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[48] Polčák, R. (2016) Informace a data v právu. Revue pro právo a technologie 7, pp. 67–91.

[49] Portál veřejné správy. [online]Available from: https://portal.gov.cz [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[50] Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the Council on the re-use of public sector information (recast). COM/2018/234 final – 2018/0111 (COD). 25 April 2018. [online] Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/proposal-revision-directive-200398ec-reuse-public-sector-information [Accessed 11 September 2018].

[51] Proposal for a revision of the Directive 2003/98/EC on the reuse of public sector information. [online] Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/proposal-revision-directive-200398ec-reuse-public-sector-information [Accessed 11 September 2018].

[52] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union (2016/L119/1). 4 May 2016. [online] Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1520438094012&uriCELEX:32016R0679 [Accessed 3 March 2018].

[53] Regulation of Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic No. 55/2014 Coll., On standards for public administration information systems. Slovakia. In Slovak.

[54] Rpvs.gov.sk.[online]Available from: https://rpvs.gov.sk/rpvs [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[55] Slov-lex.sk. [online]Available from: https://www.slov-lex.sk/domov [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[56] Statement of reasons of the act that amended Czech Freedom of Information Act. [online] Available from: https://www.psp.cz/sqw/text/orig2.sqw?idd=112562 [Accessed 9 March 2018].

[57] Study to support the review of Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information, pp. 134–140. [online] Available from: https://publications.europa.eu/en/pu blication-detail/-/publication/45328d2e-4834-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en [Accesed 11 September 2018].

[58] Ten Principles For Opening Up Government Information. Sunlight Foundation. [online] Available from: http://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/ten-open-dataprinciples/ [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[59] The Open Data Handbook.[online]Available from: http://opendatahandbook.org/ [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[60] Verhulst, S., & Young, A. (2016). Open Data impact, when demand and supply meet. Key finding of the open data Impact case studies. Opgehaald van. thegovlab.org. [online] Available from: http://odimpact.org/key-findings.html [Accessed 20 September 2018].

[61] Wypych v. Poland. (2005) No. 2428/05, ECHR (Admissability decision).


Copyright (c) 2018 Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology