Shut Down, Sued, and Silenced: Strategic Suppression Tactics of Technology Corporations
Vol.20,No.2(2026)
Technology companies have become defining actors in contemporary democratic societies, wielding structural, instrumental, and discursive power that extends far beyond the marketplace. Yet the full range of strategies through which these companies suppress dissent, neutralise critics, and resist accountability remains largely underexamined. This article addresses that gap by mapping the silencing repertoire of major technology corporations, including those collectively known as GAFAM (Google, Apple, Facebook/Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft), as documented and represented in media reporting. Based on a content analysis of61 media-reported cases from 2017-2025, we identify how tech companies silence journalists, employees, researchers, competitors, regulators, and democratic institutions. These mechanisms go beyond litigation to include legal intimidation, retaliatory dismissals, regulatory complaints, and legal challenges to legislation. While these actions may appear routine and lawful individually, collectively they create a deliberate suppression system that impacts public discourse and democratic participation. These findings matter less for court decisions than for the effects along the way: deterrence through litigation threats, resource strains on targets, and pressures on governments and regulators. The article adds to debates on platform power, corporate governance, and democratic accountability, emphasizing the need for regulations to counter the silencing influence oftech firms.
strategic silencing; suppression tactics; Big Tech; SLAPP suits; chilling effect; platform power; democratic accountability; corporate governance
221 – 245
Kristjan Kikerpill
A researcher in sociology, specializing in cyber criminology. He earned his PhD from the University of Tartu and currently serves as a lecturer in Information Law and Digital Sociology at the same institution.
[1] Aitchison, M. (2024) Elon Musk’s X sues the Australian government in ’free speech’ battle after its ’world-first’ e-Safety Commissioner ordered an ’offensive’ post to be taken down. Daily Mail. Available from: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13258303/Elon-Musk-Australian-government-eSafety-Commissioner.html [Accessed 15.03.2026].
[2] Alon-Beck, A. (2020) Times they are a-changin’: when tech employees revolt! Maryland Law Review, 80(1), 120–125.
[3] Bárd, P., Bayer, J., Luk, N. C., & Vosyliute, L. (2020) Ad-hoc request SLAPP in the EU context (EU-CITZEN Academic Network Study). CEPS., p 11-13.
[4] Birch, K. & Bronson, K. (2022) Big Tech. Science as Culture, 31(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2022.2036118.
[5] Bonini, T., & Treré, E. (2024) Algorithms of resistance: The everyday fight against platform power. MIT Press, pp. 14–15.
[6] Brander, E., & Turk, J. L. (2023) Centre for Free Expression releases report rating strength of Anti-SLAPP laws around the world. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, p 5.
[7] Brown, F., & Cefaratti, T. (2019) Big tech tyrants: How Silicon Valley’s stealth practices addict teens, silence speech, and steal your privacy. Post Hill Press/Bombardier Books, pp. 102-103.
[8] Canan, P., & Pring, G. W. (1988) Strategic lawsuits against public participation. Social Problems, 35(5), 506–519.
[9] Coalition Against SLAPPs in Europe. (2026) A 2025 report on SLAPPs in Europe: Democracy in the dock. Available from: https://www.the-case.eu/resources/2025-report-slapps-in-europe-democracy-in-the-dock/ [Accessed 29.07.2026].
[10] Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2017) Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. University of Illinois Press, p 184.
[11] Cohen, N. (2018) The know-it-alls: The rise of Silicon Valley as a political powerhouse and social wrecking ball. The New Press/Oneworld.
[12] Culpepper, P. D., & Thelen, K. (2020) Are we all Amazon Primed? Consumers and the politics of platform power. Comparative Political Studies, 53(2), 288–318, pp. 288–290.
[13] De Guzman, C. (2025) Musk’s X sues New York in latest legal battle over content moderation: What to know. TIME. Available from: https://time.com/7295402/elon-musk-x-new-york-lawsuit-free-speech-content-moderation/ [Accessed 15.03.2026].
[14] Dickman, C. R., & Danks, M. A. (2012) Scientists facing a SLAPP: Frivolous litigation stifles public comment. Future Science. DOI: 10.7882/FS.2012.038.
[15] Directive (EU) 2024/1069 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 on protecting persons who engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded claims or abusive court proceedings (‘Strategic lawsuits against public participation’), OJ L 2024/1069, 16.4.2024.
[16] European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2019) Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law. Official Journal of the European Union, L 305, 17–56. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019L1937 [Accessed 29.07.2026].
[17] Farrington, F., & Zabrocka, M. (2023) Punishment by process: The development of anti-SLAPP legislation in the European Union. ERA Forum, 24(1), p 6.
[18] Foer, F. (2017) World without mind: The existential threat of Big Tech. Penguin Press.
[19] Gerbrandy, A., & Phoa, B. (2023) The power of Big Tech corporations as modern bigness. In Big Tech Corporations and Competition Law. Routledge, pp. 167–173.
[20] Giles, R., & Murphy, B. (2016) SLAPPed: The use of strategic litigation against public participation suits and environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 44–79.
[21] Hadero, H. (2025) Amazon sues state agency to block release of company records to Bezos-owned Washington Post. AP. Available from: https://apnews.com/article/amazon-sues-washington-state-post-d3437808a375ec95712f74757ee9fe5b [Accessed 15.03.2026].
[22] Hawley, J. (2021) The tyranny of Big Tech. Regnery Publishing.
[23] Helmond, A. (2015) The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080
[24] Kavaliauskaite, J. (2024) Silenced for participation: A comparative analysis of anti-SLAPP regulations in the European Union and United States. Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne, 134(2), p 31-52.
[25] Khan, L. M. (2018) Sources of Tech Platform Power. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(2), 325–334.
[26] Langley, P. & Leyshon, A (2017) Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, Vol 3 (1), pp 11–31, DOI: 10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936.
[27] Martin, A. (2025) UK court lifts secrecy veil, confirms Apple is suing British government over ‘backdoor’ request. The Record. Available from: https://therecord.media/uk-court-confirms-apple-suing-over-backdoor-request [Accessed 15.03.2026].
[28] Miller, D. E. (2004) Terminating employees for their political speech. Business and Society Review, 109(2), pp. 232-233.
[29] Mirrlees, T. (2021) Getting at GAFAM’s ’power’ in society: A structural-relational framework. Media, Culture & Society, 43(8), pp. 1–18.
[30] Nieborg, D. B. & Helmond, A. (2019) The political economy of Facebook’s platformization in the mobile ecosystem: Facebook Messenger as a platform instance. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2), 196–218.
[31] Okumus, B. (2022) The rising political power of Silicon Valley. Issue Brief. Fiker Institute, p 5.
[32] Olesen, T. (2025) Suspicious organizations: Democracy and the power of Big Tech. Politics & Society, 54(1), p. 109.
[33] Ortutay, B. (2023) Musk’s X sues liberal advocacy group Media Matters over its report on ads next to hate groups’ posts. AP News. Available from: https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-media-matters-lawsuit-advertising-neonazi-1fe499daa600f513af27ffa68d2e8b91 [Accessed 15.03.2026].
[34] Phelan, S. (2025) Media watchdog to seek injunction halting defamation case taken by Elon Musk’s X. The Irish Independent. Available from: https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/media-watchdog-to-seek-injunction-halting-defamation-case-taken-by-elon-musks-x/a725422092.html [Accessed 15.03.2026].
[35] Reuters. (2025) X sues Modi’s government over content removal in new India censorship fight. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/mar/20/x-india-censorship-lawsuit-modi-musk [Accessed 15.03.2026].
[36] Rucz, M. (2022) SLAPPed by the GDPR: Protecting public interest journalism in the face of GDPR-based strategic litigation against public participation. Journal of Media Law, 14(2), pp. 383.
[37] Srivastava S (2023) Algorithmic Governance and the International Politics of Big Tech. Perspectives on Politics, Vol 21 (3). doi:10.1017/S1537592721003145, pp 989.
[38] Steel and Morris v. The United Kingdom, Application no. 68416/01 (ECtHR, 15 February 2005), § 89.
[39] Taplin, J. (2017) Move fast and break things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon cornered culture and undermined democracy. Little, Brown and Company.
[40] Zuboff, S. (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Copyright © 2026 Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology