Goffman's Theory as a Framework for Analysis of Self Presentation on Online Social Networks



To investigate how people form their identity on social networks and control the impressions they invoke in their audiences, we analyzed personal profiles of 50 university student Facebook users using Erving Gofmann´s dramaturgical theory. We identified five basic forms through which users create and present their identities: The Public diary, The Influencer, The Entertainer, Job and education and Hobby, as well as the appropriate secondary roles performed by users who interact with them.

These findings are corroborated by 8 semi-structured interviews with respondents, which enable a more in-depth exploration of the way they use Facebook, the social interactions they participate in, their motivation for posting contributions, and how they engage in impression management, perceive privacy and resolve issues caused by multiple audiences.

A better understanding of how privacy is conceived and what motivates users to share their personal information online is essential for public authorities’ cooperation on shaping company privacy policies and creation of appropriate legal regulations.

The key results confirm the presence of conscious effort to make a desired impression and prove Goffman’s theory of face-to-face interactions to be relevant in the context of online social networks.

Dramaturgical Theory; Erving Goffman; Facebook; Impression Management; Online Identity; Online Self-presentation; Online Social Interactions; Online Social Networks; Social Media

p. 243–276

[1] Abercrombie, N. and Longhurst, B. (1998) Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

[2] Aspling, F. (2011) The Private and the Public in Online Presentations of the Self: A Critical Development of Goffman's Dramaturgical Perspective. MA. Stockholm University.

[3] Bakshy, E., Messing S. and Adamic. L. (2015) Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348 (6239). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160

[4] boyd, d. (2006) Friends, friendster and MySpace top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11 (12). [online] Available from: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/index.html [Accessed 20 January 2019]. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i12.1418

[5] boyd, d. (2007) Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Public in Teenage Social Life. In: David Buckingham (ed.). MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning – Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[6] boyd, d. and Ellison, N.B. (2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1). [online] Available from: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html [Accessed 7 March 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

[7] Chou, H. G. and Edge, N. (2012) ”They Are Happier and Having Better Lives than I Am”: The Impact of Using Facebook on Perceptions of Others' Lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15 (2). [online] Available from: http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/cyber.2011.0324 [Accessed 21 May 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0324

[8] Dijck, J. (2013) The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. New York: Oxford University Press.

[9] Dočekal, D. (2016) TIP#650: Kolik má v Česku Facebook uživatelů? Jak je to s věkem? Proč jsou ta čísla tak podivná? [blog entry] 6 November. Prague: 365tipu. Available from: https://365tipu.wordpress.com/2016/11/06/tip650-kolik-ma-v-cesku-facebook-uzivatelu-jak-je-to-s-vekem-proc-jsou-ta-cisla-tak-podivna/ [Accessed 20 January 2019].

[10] Eisenlauer, V. (2014) Facebook as a third author – (Semi-)automated participation framework in Social Network Sites. Journal of Pragmatics, 72. [online] Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S037821661400037X [Accessed 21 May 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.006

[11] Facebook. (2018) Facebook Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results. [online] MENLO PARK, California: Facebook. Available from: https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2018/Facebook-Reports-Third-Quarter-2018-Results/default.aspx [Accessed 11 December 2018].

[12] Facebook. (2019) How News Feed Works. What kinds of posts will I see in News Feed? [online] Available from: https://www.facebook.com/help/www/1155510281178725 [Accessed 24 January 2019].

[13] Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

[14] Gosling, S. D. et al. (2011) Manifestations of Personality in Online Social Networks: Self-Reported Facebook-Related Behaviors and Observable Profile Information. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14 (9). [online] Available from: http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/cyber.2010.0087 [Accessed 21 May 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0087

[15] Greenwood, S., Perrin, A. and Duggan, M. (2016) Social Media Update. [online] Washington: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/ [Accessed 17 April 2018].

[16] Hewitt, A. and Forte, A. (2006) Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. In: Proc 2006 CSCW, Canada, 4–8 November. [online] Available from: http://andreaforte.net/HewittForteCSCWPoster2006.pdf [Accessed 7 March 2018].

[17] Hogan, B. (2010) The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30 (6). [online] Available from: http://bst.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0270467610385893 [Accessed 11 May 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610385893

[18] Lenhart, A. (2015) Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015. [online] Washington: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/ [Accessed 8 June 2017].

[19] Lewis, K., Kaufman, J. and Christakis, N. (2008) The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14 (1). [online] Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01432.x [Accessed 12 March 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01432.x

[20] Lin, R. and Utz, S. (2015) The emotional responses of browsing Facebook: Happiness, envy, and the role of tie strength. Computers in Human Behavior, 52. [online] Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S074756321500360X [Accessed 21 May 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.064

[21] Macek, J. (2013) More than a desire for text: Online participation and the social curation of content. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19 (3). [online] Available from: http://con.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1354856513486530 [Accessed 15 January 2019]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856513486530

[22] Marwick, A. E. and boyd, d. (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13 (1). [online] Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444810365313 [Accessed 10 December 2018]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313

[23] McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L. and Cook J.M. (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415

[24] Michikyan, M. et al. (2014) Can you tell who I am? Neuroticism, extraversion, and online self-presentation among young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 33. [online] Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0747563214000156 [Accessed 21 May 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.010

[25] Miller, H. (2016) Investigating the Potential for Miscommunication Using Emoji. [blog entry] 5 April. GroupLens. Available from: https://grouplens.org/blog/investigating-the-potential-for-miscommunication-using-emoji/ [Accessed 26 January 2019].

[26] Pospíšilová, M. (2016) Facebooková (ne)závislost: identita, interakce a uživatelská kariéra na Facebooku. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, nakladatelství Karolinum.

[27] Riccio, J. R. (2013) All The Web's a Stage: The Dramaturgy of Young Adult Social Media Use. Syracuse: Syracuse University, Theses – ALL. Paper 16. Magisterská práce (MA) Syracuse University. Available from: http://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=thesis [Accessed 5 May 2017].

[28] Sarikakis, K. and Winter L. (2017) Social Media Users’ Legal Consciousness About Privacy. Social Media + Society. [online] Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2056305117695325#articleCitationDownloadContainer [Accessed 26 August 2019]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117695325

[29] Steinberg, L. (2008) Adolescence. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

[30] Stone, A. R. (1991) Will the Real Body Please Stand Up? Boundary Stories About Virtual Cultures. In: Michael Benedikt (ed.). Cyberspace: First Steps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[31] Studýnková, N. (2010) Konzumace pirátských kopií televizních seriálových narací. Bakalářská práce. Masarykova univerzita, Fakulta sociálních studií. Vedoucí práce Jakub Macek. Available from: http://con.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1354856513486530 [Accessed 28 December 2018].

[32] Suh, J. J. and Hargittai, E. (2015) Privacy Management on Facebook: Do Device Type and Location of Posting Matter? Social Media + Society, 1 (2). [online] Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2056305115612783 [Accessed 21 May 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115612783

[33] Ugander, J., Karrer. B., Backstrom, L., Marlow, C. (2011) The Anatomy of the Facebook Social Graph. ArXiv, 1111.4503. [online] Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51956889_The_Anatomy_of_the_Facebook_Social_Graph [Accessed 24 January 2019].

[34] Wallace, E., Buil, I., de Chernatony, L. and Hogan, M. (2014) Who “ likes" You… and why? A Typology of Facebook Fans from “Fan” –atics and Self Expressives to Utilitarians and Authentics”. Journal of Advertising Research, 54 (1). https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-54-1-092-109

[35] Walther, J. B. a D'addario, K. P. (2001) The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19 (3). [online] Available from: http://ssc.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/089443930101900307 [Accessed 21 May 2017]. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900307

[36] Wikipedia. (2019) Homophily. [online] Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homophily [Accessed 24 January 2019].

[37] Wimmer, A. and Lewis K. (2010) Beyond and Below Racial Homophily: ERG Models of a Friendship Network Documented on Facebook. American Journal of Sociology, 116 (2). https://doi.org/10.1086/653658

[38] Zhao, S. (2005) The Digital Self: Through the Looking Glass of Telecopresent Others. Symbolic Interaction, 28 (3). [online] Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1525/si.2005.28.3.387 [Accessed 27 October 2018]. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.2005.28.3.387

[39] Zhao, X. et al. (2013) The many faces of facebook. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI '13, Paris, 27 April – 2 May. New York, USA: ACM Press. [online] Available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2470654.2470656 [Accessed 18 January 2018].





PDF views