Consequences of the Use of Personalization Algorithms in Shaping an Offer – A Private Law Perspective
Vol.13,No.2(2019)
Personalization mechanisms in consumer e-commerce allow for the adjustment of the time, form and manner of contact, the way of concluding the contract and the availability and content of the offer. Subsequently concluded agreements can be seen as a new phase of development of the consumer transaction model – secondary individualization replaces standardization. The possibility of concluding contracts on a massive scale is retained, but with added granularity and flexibility that mimic the individualisation of transactions. Special provisions for personalized contracts are missing on the EU level and within the Polish legal system.
The starting point is an analysis of the reaction of the traditional private instruments of Polish law towards the personalization of offers – case law and doctrinal approach towards the concept of a standard contract and an individually negotiated one are examined. Next, the pre-contractual stage is investigated – the personalization process is explored from the perspective of unfair practices regulation, and the legal basis for the personalization process in the context of the GDPR is discussed. While Polish national law focuses on combating the undesired results of personalization, the EU initiatives aim at granting ex-ante protection. The mechanism in directive 2005/29/EC is being supplemented with an information protection mechanism (consent requirement). The limitations of this model are identified and some alternative solutions are proposed.
Consumer Protection; GDPR; Personalization; Unfair Commercial Practices
p. 161–188
Katarzyna Południak-Gierz
Jagiellonian University
[1] Acquisti, A., Taylor, C. and Wagman, L. (2016) The Economics of Privacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 52 (2). https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.54.2.442
[2] Act on Competition and Consumer Protection (Dz.U.2018.798 j.t.).
[3] Act on Counteracting Unfair Market Practices (Dz.U.2017.2070 j.t.).
[4] Bar-Gill, O. (2019) Algorithmic Price Discrimination When Demand Is A Function Of Both Preferences And (Mis)Perceptions. University of Chicago Law Review, 86 (2).
[5] Bednarek, M. (2005) Wzorce umów w prawie polskim. Warszawa: Monografie Prawnicze.
[6] Bednarek, M. (2013) Wzorce umów. In: Zbigniew Radwański (ed.). System Prawa Prywatnego. Vol. 5, Ewa Łętowska (ed.). Prawo zobowiązań – część ogólna. 2nd ed. Legalis.
[7] Borocz, I. (2015) Clash of Interests – Is Behaviour-Based Price Discrimination in Line with the GDPR. Studia Iuridica Auctoritate Universitatis Pecs Publicata, 153 (37).
[8] Brownsword, R. (2018) The E-Commerce Directive, Consumer Transactions, and the Digital Single Market – Questions of Regulatory Fitness, Regulatory Disconnection and Rule Redirection. In: Stefan Grundmann (ed.). European Contract Law in Digital Age. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia.
[9] Busch, C. (2016) The Future of Pre-contractual Information Duties: From Behavioural Insights to Big Data. In: Twigg-Flesner C. (ed.). Research Handbook on EU Consumer and Contract Law. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
[10] Busch, C. (2019) Implementing Personalized Law: Personalized Disclosures in Consumer Law and Data Privacy Law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 86 (2). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3181913
[11] Calo, R. (2014) Digital Market Manipulation. The George Washington Law Review, 82. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2309703
[12] Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ L 95, 21.4.1993, p. 29–34).
[13] Directive 2005/29/EC of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union (2005/L 149/22).
[14] Duhigg, C. (2009) What Does Your Credit-Card Company Know About You? Submitted to: The New York Times Magazine. [online] Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/magazine/17credit-t.html [Accessed 12 December 2018].
[15] Furner, Ch. P., Serino, C. M. and Smatt, C. Making it personal: How personalization affects trust over time. [online] Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1385576/ [Accessed 1 May 2019].
[16] Hellwege, P. (2018) Right of Withdrawal in Distance and Off-Premises Contracts. In: Nils Jansen, Reinhard Zimmermann (eds.). Commentaries on European contract laws. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[17] Hondius, E. (1995) The Reception of Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts by Member States. European Review of Private Law, 3.
[18] Judgement of 19 October 2016, Breyer, Case C-582/14, ECLI:EU:C:2016:779.
[19] Judgement of Constitutional Tribunal (8.12.2003), K 3/02, OTK-A 2003/9/99.
[20] Judgement of Court of Appeal in Katowice (29.11.2011) V ACa 546/11. [online] Available from: https://www.katowice.sa.gov.pl/container/orzeczenia/V_ACa_546-11.pdf [Accessed 11 December 2018].
[21] Judgement of Court of Appeal in Warsaw (1.11.2016) VI ACa 1285/15. [online] Available from: http://orzeczenia.waw.sa.gov.pl/details/$N/154500000003003_VI_ACa_001285_2015_Uz_2016-11-09_002 [Accessed 11 December 2018].
[22] Judgement of Polish Supreme Court (20.07.2017) I CSK 704/16, Legalis no 1668805.
[23] Judgement of Polish Supreme Court (26.03.2010) I CSK 444/09 Legalis no 362191.
[24] Judgement of Polish Supreme Court (7.07.2005) V CK 855/04, PUG 2005/10.
[25] Judgement of Polish Supreme Court (1.03.2017) IV CSK 285/16, LEX no 2308321.
[26] Judgement of Polish Supreme Court (5.09.1991) III CZP 75/91, OSNC 1992/5/67.
[27] Komiak, Sh. and Benbasat, I. (2006) The Effects of Personalization and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents. MIS Quarterly, 30 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148760
[28] Kuner, C. (2007) European data protection law. Corporate Compliance and Regulation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[29] Łętowska, E. (1974) Problematyka ogólnych warunków i wzorów umów w świetle poglądów doktryny obcej. Studia Prawnicze, 3.
[30] Łętowska, E. (2002) Prawo umów konsumenckich. 2nd ed. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
[31] Łętowska, E. (2004) Nieuczciwe klauzule w prawie umów konsumenckich. Warszawa: C. H. Beck.
[32] Lubasz, D. and Chomiczewski, W. (2018) In: Dominik Lubasz (ed.). RODO. Ogólne rozporządzenie o ochronie danych. Komentarz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, LEX no 10655.
[33] Luzak, J. (2015) Online Disclosure Rules of the Consumer Rights Directive: Protecting Passive or Active Consumers?. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 4 (3). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2553877
[34] Luzak, J. (2017) You too will be judged: erga omnes effect of registered unfair contract terms in Poland. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 6 (3).
[35] Mendoza, I. and Bygrave, L. A. (2017) The Right Not to Be Subject to Automated Decisions Based on Profiling. [online] Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2964855 [Accessed 12 December 2018].
[36] Mikłaszewicz, P. (2008) Obowiązki informacyjne w umowach z udziałem konsumentów na tle prawa Unii Europejskiej. Warszawa, Kraków: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
[37] Mularski, K. and Radwański, Z. (2019) Zagadnienia ogólne czynności prawnych. In: Zbigniew Radwański (ed.). System prawa prywatnego, 2, Zbigniew Radwański, Andrzej Olejniczak (eds.). Prawo cywilne – część ogólna. 3rd ed. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
[38] Nemzeti Fogyasztóvédelmi Hatóság v. UPC Magyarország Kft. (2015) TSUE. No. C-388/13.
[39] Polish Civil Code (Dz.U.2018.1025).
[40] Polski Związek Firm Deweloperskich v. Prezes UOKiK. (2010) SOKiK (Court of Competition and Consumer Protection) 25 March, No XVII Ama 43/09, Dziennik Urzędowy UOKiK, 3.
[41] Południak-Gierz, K. (2017) Dangers and benefits of personalisation in Contract Law: big data approach. Queen Mary Law Journal, Special Conference Issue: Autumn.
[42] Południak-Gierz, K. (2017) From Information Asymmetry to Information Overload – Technological Society of Consumers. In: Patrícia Kaplánová (ed.). Contemporary issues of societal development. Novo mesto.
[43] Porat, A. and Strahilevitz, L. J. (2014) Personalizing Default Rules and Disclosure with Big Data. Michigan Law Review, 112 (8). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2217064
[44] Poullet, Y. (2002) How To Regulate Internet: New Paradigms For Internet Governance Self-Regulation: Value And Limits. In: Claire Monville (ed.). Variations sur le droit de la société de l'information. Bruxelles: Bruylant. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85573-580-4.50005-7
[45] Pyrzyńska, A. (2019) In: Maciej Gutowski (ed.). Kodeks cywilny. Tom II. Komentarz. Art. 353–626. 2nd ed. Legalis.
[46] Pyziak-Szafnicka, M. (1994) Kilka uwag na temat ochrony przed narzucaniem nieuczciwych warunków umowy. Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, 9.
[47] Radwański, Z. (2003) Zobowiązania: część ogólna. 4th ed. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
[48] Radwański, Z. and Olejniczak, A. (2018) Zobowiązania: część ogólna. 13th ed. Warszawa: C. H. Beck.
[49] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union (L 119, 4.5.2016).
[50] Rejdak, M. (2005) Definicja terminu „wzorzec umowy konsumenckiej”. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, LXVII (3).
[51] Rzetecka-Gil, A. (2011) Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz. Zobowiązania – część ogólna. LEX no 8853.
[52] Schultz, T. (2008) Carving up the Internet: Jurisdiction, Legal Orders, and the Private/Public International Law Interfaces. The European Journal of International Law, 19 (4). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn040
[53] Schulze, R. and Schulte-Nölke, H. (2003) Analysis of National Fairness Laws Aimed at Protecting Consumers in Relation to Commercial Practices (Report Commissioned by the European Commission, DG Sanco), 37. [online] Available from: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/204413/1/unfair_practices_en.pdf [Accessed 12 December 2018].
[54] Schulze, R. and Zoll, F. (2018) European Contract Law. 2nd ed. München: C. H. Beck; Oxford: Hart; Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845287850
[55] Stefanicki, R. (2009) Ustawa o przeciwdziałaniu nieuczciwym praktykom rynkowym. Komentarz. Warszawa: LexisNexis Polska.
[56] Steppe, R. (2017) Online price discrimination and personal data: A General Data Protection Regulation perspective. Computer Law & Security Review, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.008
[57] Steppe, R. (2017) Prijsdiscriminatie in het digitale tijdperk: Beschouwingen over de nieuwe algemene verordening gegevensbescherming. In: Matthias E. Storme, Werner F. Helsen (eds.). Innovatie en disruptie in het economisch recht. Antwerpen: Intersentia.
[58] Trzaskowski, R. (2018) In: Jacek Gudowski (ed.). Kodeks cywilny. Komentarz. Tom III. Zobowiązania. Część ogólna. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, LEX no 10698.
[59] Twigg-Flesner C. (2010) In: Hans-W. Micklitz, Jules Stuyck and Evelyne Terryn (eds.). Cases, materials and Text on Consumer Law. Oxford, Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
[60] Wagner, G. and Eidenmüller H. (2019) Down by Algorithms? Siphoning Rents, Exploiting Biases, and Shaping Preferences: Regulating the Dark Side of Personalized Transactions. The University of Chicago Law Review, 86 (2). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3160276
[61] Zachariasiewicz, M. A. (1995) Niektóre problemy prawne związane z korzystaniem z nienormatywnych wzorców umownych. Rejent, 9.
[62] Zoll, F. (1997) Potrzeba i kierunek nowelizacji kodeksowego ujęcia problematyki wzorców umownych. Biuletyn Rady Legislacyjnej, 1.
[63] Zoll, F. (2012) Problem negatywnego uzgodnienia cech rzeczy sprzedanej – w oczekiwaniu na wspólne europejskie prawo sprzedaży. Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego, 2.
[64] Zoll, F. (2018) Rękojmia. Odpowiedzialność sprzedawcy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck.
[65] Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.J. and Poort, J.P. (2017) Online Price Discrimination and EU Data Privacy Law. Journal of Consumer Policy, 40 (3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-017-9354-z
Copyright © 2019 Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology