Web-page Screenshots as an Evidence in Civil Procedure of Ukraine

Nelli Golubeva, Kristina Drogoziuk

Abstract

Currently the question about the possibility of including a screenshot of a web-page to the base of evidence in civil procedure of Ukraine remains open. The problem is a lack of systematic rules for determining procedures for obtaining electronic evidence, in particular, screenshots, in Ukrainian legislation, as well as possibilities for their use while considering civil cases. Various electronic evidence should correspond various admissibility criterias, and therefore the admissibility of electronic evidence should be examined separately according to each type of evidence.

Separate issues of investigation, fixation and certification of web-screenshots as evidence in civil procedure of Ukraine are considered in this article. The analysis of legal regulation and problems of the practical implementation of use of web-pages screenshots in Ukrainian civil procedure are carried out. The ways of implementation of recommendation rules for registration and fixation of web-screenshots in civil procedure, which can be applied for all European states, are proposed.

Keywords

Civil Procedure; Civil Procedure of Ukraine; Electronic Documents; Electronic Evidence; Means of Proof; Proving; Screenshots; Website

Full Text:

References

Show references Hide references

[1] Afyan, A. (2013) The role of the notary in the process of proving the facts regarding information in the Internet. Civilisticheskaya processualnaya musl'. Mezhdunarodnyi zbornik nauchnykh statey, 2, pp. 119–125.

[2] Badila, O. (2014) Evidence and the need to provide them with a notary and a court: topical issues. Nashe pravo, 4, pp. 156–161.

[3] Decision of Goloseevsky District Court of Kyiv from 10. 10. 2015 in case No 752/9476/15. [online] in Ukrainian. Available from: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/52726541 [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[4] Decision of Pechersk District Court of Kyiv from 1. 4. 2016 in case No 757/13905/16. [online] in Ukrainian. Available from: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/56950422 [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[5] Decision of Pechersk District Court of Kyiv from 24. 5. 2017 in case No 757/43218/16. [online] in Ukrainian. Available from: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/66859813 [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[6] Decision of the High Specialized Court of Ukraine for the consideration of civil and criminal cases from 22. 2. 2017, Сase No 761/13156/16-ц. [online] Available from: http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/65038960 [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[7] Directive 1999/93/EC of European Parliament and of Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community Framework for Electronic Signatures (Electronic Signatures Directive). Official Journal of European Communities. L 13. [online] Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31999L0093 [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[8] Directive 2000/31/EC of European Parliament and of Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce). Official Journal of European Communities. L 178. [online] Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32000L0031 [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[9] Draft Law on Amendments to Article 100 of Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine (regarding the certification of copies of electronic evidence). [online] Available from: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=63876 [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[10] Fundamentals of the legislation of the Russian Federation on notary, Federal Law of 11. 2. 1993, No 4462-1. [online] in Russian. Available from: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_1581 [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[11] Chornyi S. and Antoniyuk O. (2018) Electronic evidence in civil proceedings: problems of practical application. Visnyk students'kogo naukovogo tovarystva DonNU imeni Vasylya Stusa. [online] Available from: http://jvestnik-sss.donnu.edu.ua/article/download/5468/5495 [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[12] Kalamayko, A. (2015) The Internet Network as a Source of Evidence in Civil Process. Yurydychna Ukraina. Civilnyi proces, 4/50, pp. 118–123.

[13] Kucher, T. (2013) Features of the application of evidence created with the help of computer technologies in the notarial process. Civilisticheskaya processualnaya musl'. Mezhdunarodnyi zbornik naychnukh statey, 2, pp. 147–154.

[14] Laz’ko, O. (2015) Prospects for the development of electronic (technical) means of proof in civil process of Ukraine. Evropeyski perspectyvy, 1, pp. 125–129.

[15] Lezhuh, T. (2013) The use of electronic evidence in cases relating to the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation. Viche, 16, pp. 13–15.

[16] Minsk Convention on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family and Criminal Matters (7. 10. 2002). [online] Available from: http://cisarbitration.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Minsk-Convention-on-Legal-Assistance-and-Legal-Relations-in-Civil-Family-and-Criminal-Matters-english.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[17] Okhromeev, Yu. (2012) Collection of evidence base in cases of violation of rights in the Internet. [online] Available from: http://uba.ua/documents/text/27_01_2012Okhromeev.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[18] Pavlova, Iu. (2017) Some aspects of the admissibility of electronic evidence in the civil procedural procedure law of Ukraine. Prykarpatskyi yurydychnyi visnyk, 5 (20), pp. 83–87.

[19] Petrenko, V. (2018) Electronic evidence as an element of information technology in civil justice. Molodyi vchenyi, 1 (53), pp. 111–115.

[20] Procedure for certifying the authenticity of copies of documents, Ukraine. [online] Available from: http://www.minjust.gov.ua/15101 [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[21] Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC. Official Journal of European Communities. [online] Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/910/oj [Accessed 6 May 2019].

[22] Reshetnikova, I. and Yarkov, V. (1999) Grazhdanskoe pravo i grazhdanskyi process v sovremennoy Rossii [Civil law and civil process in modern Russia]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Norma.

[23] Tripulskiy, G. (2015) Some aspects of the admissibility of evidence obtained on the Internet in the civil process. Tsyvil’ne sudochynstvo u svitli sudovoi reformy v Ukraini: materialy mizhn. nauk.-pract. konf. im. Yu. S. Chervonogo [Civil Justice in the Light of Judicial Reform in Ukraine: materials of the int. scient. and pract. conf. Yu.S. Chervonogo], Odessa, 18 December, Ukraine: National University “Odessa law academy”, pp. 73–77.

[24] Tripulskyi, G. (2015) The possibility to provide evidence in the case by notaries. Tsyvil’ne Sudochynstvo u svitli sudovoi reformy v Ukraini: materialy „kruglogo stolu“ [Civil justice in the light of judicial reform in Ukraine: materials of the “round table“], Odessa, 16 May. Ukraine: National University “Odessa law academy”, pp. 43–45.

[25] Tsehan, D. (2013) Digital evidence: the concept, features and place in evidence system. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnogo gumanitarnogo universytety. Iurisprudencia, 5, pp. 256–260.

[26] U.S. Supreme Court, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., United States Reports, vol. 509, pp. 579–601, 1983.

[27] UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce (1996). [online] Available from: https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/electcom/05-89450_Ebook.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[28] UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures (2001). [online] Available from: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/electcom/ml-elecsig-e.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2019].

[29] Yacenko, O. (2013) Providing evidence by notaries, or neighboring experience, which is lacking in Ukrainian lawyers. Yurydychnyi zhurnal, 5 (131), pp. 60–67.

https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2019-1-5


Copyright (c) 2019 Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology