ANALYZING EFL CLASSROOM TALK DURING CLASS OPENING: TOPIC SHIFT AND NEGOTIATION

Vol.9,No.2(2016)

Abstract
This exploratory study, following a conversation analytic (CA) perspective, investigates topic shift in classroom talk during the class opening. The data, which are natural observational, come from three hours of audio-recordings of verbal interaction between four EFL teachers and their students during the class opening at an Asian university. The fi ndings are threefold. First, the EFL teachers’ topic-changing turns are much longer than turns that do not serve the same purpose. Second, the EFL teachers’ topic-changing turns consist of two parts: a) the fi rst part deals with the students’ preceding topic and turns; and b) the second part is intentionally designed to prompt the next topic. Third, discourse markers are placed between the two parts. A close analysis of the EFL teachers’ topic-changing turns suggests that they may make topic shift appear more natural and spontaneous. However, their turns have features that diff erentiate them from those located in mundane talk.

Keywords:
teacher talk; topic shift; classroom communication; class opening; discourse markers
References

Atkinson, J. M. and Drew, P. (1979) Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal
Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.


Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.


Brumfi t, C. and Johnson, K. (1979) The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Canale, M. (1983) ‘From communicative competence to communicative language
pedagogy.’ In: Richard J. C. and Schmidt, C. (eds) Language and Communication.
New York, NY: Longman. 2-27.


Cazden, C. (2001) Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.


Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992) ‘Analyzing talk at work: An introduction.’ In: Drew, P.
and Heritage, J. (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. 3-65.


Gardner, R. (1997) ‘The listener and minimal responses in conversational interaction.’
Prospect 12 (2), 12-32.


Heritage, J. (1984) Garfi nkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.


Heritage, J. (2010) ‘Questioning in medicine.’ In: Freed, A. and Ehrlich, S. (eds) Why Do
You Ask?: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. New York: Oxford
University Press. 42-68.


Heritage, J. (2011) ‘The interaction order and clinical practice: Some observations on
dysfunctions and action steps.’ Patient Education and Counseling 84 (3), 338-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.022


Heritage, J. and Robinson, J. (2011) ‘‘Some’ vs ‘any’ medical issues: Encouraging patients
to reveal their unmet concerns.’ In: Antaki, C. (ed.) Applied Conversation Analysis:
Changing Institutional Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 15-31.

Holmes, J. (2000) ‘Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the
workplace.’ Discourse Studies 2 (2), 159-185.


Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. (2003) Power and Politeness in the Workplace. A Sociolinguistic
Analysis of Talk at Work. Edinburgh Gate and London: Pearson.


Hua Z., Seedhouse P., Wei L. and Cook V. (2007) Language Learning and Teaching as
Social Interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.


Hymes, D. H. (1972). ‘On communicative competence.’ In Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J.
(eds) Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 269-293.


Jeff erson, G. (1984) ‘Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens
‘Yeah’ and ‘Mmhm’.’ Paper in Linguistics 17 (2),197-216.


Lerner, G. (1994) ‘Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for
accomplishing multifaceted social action.’ Journal of Language and Social
Psychology 13 (1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94131002


Lerner, G. (1995) ‘Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional
activities.’ Discourse Processes 19 (1), 111-131.


Markee, N. (2000) Conversation Analysis. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.


Maynard, D. (1980) ‘Placement of topic changes in conversation.’ Semiotica 30 (3-4),
263-290. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1980.30.3-4.263


Mayr, A. (2008) Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse.
London: Continuum.


Mehan, H. (1979) ‘“What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in
classroom discourse.’ Theory into Practice 18 (4), 285-294.


Mumby, D. (1988) Communication and Power in Organizations: Discourse, Ideology and
Domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.


Nunan, D. (1989) Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.


Richards, J. C. and Lockhart, C. (1994) Refl ective Teaching in Second Language
Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. (2014) Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching.
2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.


Sacks, H. (1973) ‘On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in
conversation.’ In: Button, G. and Lee, J. (eds) Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters. 54-69.


Sacks, H., Schegloff , E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) ‘A simplest systematics for the
organisation of turn-taking for conversation.’ Language 50 (4), 696-735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010


Savignon, S. (1983) Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice.
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.


Schegloff, E. A. (1968) ‘Sequencing in conversational openings.’ American Anthropologist
70 (6), 1075-1095. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030


Schegloff, E. A. (1982) ‘Discourse as interactional achievement, some uses of ‘uh huh’ and
other things that come between sentences.’ In: Tannen, D. (ed.) Analysing Discourse:
Text and Talk. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 71-93.


Schegloff, E. A. (1992) ‘Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of
intersubjectivity in conversation.’ American Journal of Sociology 97 (5), 1295-1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903


Schegloff , E. A. and Sacks, H. (1973) ‘Opening up closings.’ Semiotica 8 (4), 289-327.


Seedhouse, P. (2004) The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A
Conversation Analysis Perspective. MA: Blackwell.


Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used
by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thornborrow, J. (2002) Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse.
London: Longman.


Tracy, K. (1984) ‘Staying on topic: An explication of conversational relevance.’ Discourse
Processes 7 (4), 447-464.


Vine, B. (2004) Getting Things Done at Work: The Discourse of Power in Workplace
Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Walsh, S. (2011) Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. New York:
Routledge.


Watson Todd, R. (1997) Classroom Teaching Strategies. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice
Hall.


West, C. (1984) ‘When the doctor is a ‘lady’: Power, status and gender in physicianpatient encounters.’ Symbolic Interaction 7 (1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1984.7.1.87


West, C. (1990) ‘Not just ‘doctors’ orders’: Directive-response sequences in patients’
visits to women and men physicians.’ Discourse and Society 1 (1), 85-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926590001001005


West, C. (1998) ‘When the doctor is a ‘lady’: Power, status and gender in physicianpatient
encounters.’ In: Coates, J. (ed.) Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford:
Blackwell. 396-412.


Widdowson, H. (1978) Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.


Wong, J. and Waring, H. Z. (2010) Conversation Analysis and Second Language
Pedagogy: A Guide for ESL/EFL Teachers. New York: Routledge.

Metrics

5263

Views

332

PDF views