A DISCOURSE DESCRIPTION OF FOUR FUNDRAISING TEXTS – LINGUISTS MEET PRACTITIONERS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

Patrick Chi-Wai Lee

doi:10.5817/DI2016-2-25

A DISCOURSE DESCRIPTION OF FOUR FUNDRAISING TEXTS – LINGUISTS MEET PRACTITIONERS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

Vol.9,No.2(2016)

Patrick Chi-Wai Lee

https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2016-2-25

PDF

Abstract

This exploratory study presents four fund-raising texts for an analysis. Two are written as appeal letters and two as leafl ets. Their purpose of writing is to persuade an audience of Hong Kong residents to donate money for charity organizations. A qualitative approach informed by ethnography is adopted. Interviews with two organizations are conducted and verbal reporting of practitioners is used. In this study, one focus is on the schematic structure of texts and fund-raising texts are recognized as a particular of genre. The ‘Problem-solution discourse pattern’ can be applied to the fund-raising texts even though practitioners did not acknowledge they use any linguistic models. As for the textual moves, ‘situation or problem’ is always placed at the beginning of the text because it is crucial to let readers know what the main theme is. Then there are diff erent combinations of the second move including ‘response, solution or problem’. The fi nal move is always ‘response’ and two meanings of ‘response’ are refi ned to diff erent parameters: (i) tangibility: tangible and virtual solution, (ii) time frame: proposed and reference solution, and (iii) depth of target-achievement: ultimate and specifi c solution. Another focus of this study is on the choice of style. As persuasion of readers to donate is crucial, adding involving devices is to engage readers and make them ‘particular’, which increases the possibility to solicit response successfully. Involvement devices include using you and imperative clauses. Finally, with reference to the issue of whether ‘textual structure tells us the reality’ or ‘the reality creates the structure’, practitioners are not concerned too much with text structure. Practically, the reality to them is embodied in the structure.

Keywords:
choice of style; ethnography; fundraising; text-structure; practitioners

References

Atkinson, P. (2001) Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage.

Atkinson, P. and Hammersley, M. (2007) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London:
Routledge.

Bazerman, C. (1997) ‘Some informal comments on texts mediating fund-raising
relationships: Cultural sites of affi liation.’ Written Discourse in Philanthropic Fund
Raising: Issues of Language and Rhetoric 98 (13), 17-26.

Bhatia, V. K. (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London:
Longman.

Bhatia, V. K. (1998) ‘Generic patterns in fundraising discourse.’ New Directions for
Philanthropic Fundraising 22, 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/pf.2207

Bhatia, V. K. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London and New
York: Continuum.

Bhatia, V. K. (2008) ‘Genre analysis, ESP and professional practice.’ English for Specifi c
Purposes 27 (2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.005

Bhatia, V. K. (2010) ‘Interdiscursivity in professional communication.’ Discourse and
Communication 4 (1), 32-50.

Bryman, A. (2008) Social Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press.

Burnett, K. (1996) Friends for Life: Relationship Fundraising in Practice. London: The
White Lion Press Limited.

Callow, K. and Callow, J. (1992) ‘Text as purposive communication.’ In: Mann, W. and
Thompson, A. (eds) Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fundraising
Text. 5-38.

Clarke, S. and Norton, M. (1997) The Complete Fundraising Handbook. London:
Directory of Social Change.

Connor, U. and Gladkov, K. (2004). ‘Rhetorical appeals in fundraising direct mail letters.’
In: Connor, U. and Upton, T. A. (eds) Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from
Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 257-286.

Grimes, J. (1975) The Thread of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton.

Gunnarson, B.-L. (1997) ‘The writing process from a sociolinguistic viewpoint.’ Written
Communications 16 (2), 139-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088397014002001

Hoey, M. (1983) On the Surface of Discourse. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Hoey, M. (1991) Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hoey, M (1994) ‘Signalling in discourse: A functional analysis of a common discourse
pattern in written and spoken English.’ In: Coulthard, M. (ed.) Advances in Written
Text Analysis. 26-45.

Hoey, M. (2001) Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis.
London: Routledge.

Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (2014) Principles of Marketing. Boston: Pearson.

Kaplan-Weinger, J. and Ullman, C. (2015) Methods for the Ethnography of Communication:
Language in Use in Schools and Communities. New York: Routledge.

Labov, W. (1997) ‘Some further steps in narrative analysis.’ Journal of Narrative and Life
History 7, 395-415. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.49som

Mann, W., Mathiessen, C. and Thompson, S. (1992) ‘Rhetorical structure theory and
text analysis.’ In: Mann, W. and Thompson, A. (eds) Discourse Description: Diverse
Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text. 39-78.

Mann, W. and Thompson, S. (1992) Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses
of a Fund-Raising Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

O’Reilly, K. (2009) Key Concepts in Ethnography. London: Sage.

Richards, J., Platt, J. and Platt, H. (1998) Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and
Applied Linguistics. Hong Kong: Longman.

Rotzoll, K. B., Haefner, J. E., and Sandage, C. H. (1986) Advertising in Contemporary
Society. West Chicago, IL: South-Western Publishing Company.

Smith, G. (1996) Asking Properly: The Art of Creative Metaphor. San Diego: Academic
Press.

Spivey, N. N. (1997) The Constructionist Metaphor. San Diego: Academic Press.

Tannen, D. (1989) Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational
Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tannen, D. (2005) Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends. New York:
Oxford University Press.

Van Dijk, T. (1993) ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis.’ Discourse and Society 4,
249-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006

Van Dijk, T. (2001) ‘Critical discourse analysis.’ In: Tannen, D., Schiff rin, D. and
Hamilton, H. (eds) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 352-371.

Weinstein, S. (2009) The Complete Guide to Fundraising Management. N.J.: John Wiley
& Sons.

Wharton, C. (2015) Advertising: Critical Approaches. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Williams, K. A. (2013) Leading the Fundraising Charge – The Role of the Non-Profi t
Executive. NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Winter, E. (1976) Fundamentals of Information Structure: A Pilot Manual for Further
Development According to Student Need. The Hatfi eld Polytechnic.

Winter, E. (1992) ‘The notion of unspecifi c versus specifi c as one way of analyzing the
information of a fund-raising letter.’ In: Mann, W. and Thompson, A. (eds) Discourse
Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text. 131-170.

Metrics