CROSS CULTURAL VARIATION OF QUESTIONING IN NEWS INTERVIEWS – A CASE OF POST-QUESTION ELABORATION IN CHINESE NEWS INTERVIEWS

Hongqiang Zhu; Tong Chen

doi:10.5817/DI2016-2-5

CROSS CULTURAL VARIATION OF QUESTIONING IN NEWS INTERVIEWS – A CASE OF POST-QUESTION ELABORATION IN CHINESE NEWS INTERVIEWS

Vol.9,No.2(2016)

Hongqiang Zhu Tong Chen

https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2016-2-5

PDF

Abstract

Questioning practice in news interviews has long been a central concern in the current studies of media discourse analysis in terms of its role in maintaining journalistic neutralism. Questions are usually structured into two forms: simple and complex one. In western news interviews, prefatory statements in complex questions are suffi ciently examined in previous studies. Drawing on Conversation Analysis as methodology, this paper examines the questioning practice of English news interviews (i.e., Dialogue) aired in Chinese context and captures the post-question elaboration as a noticeable variant particularity in questioning practice in Chinese news interviews. Post-question elaborations are recognized in terms of the formal features in question design and their functions in the interviewer-interviewee interaction and further categorized into three types: fi rst, post-question elaboration being evaded; second, post-question elaboration being answered along with the question; third, post-question elaboration being answered with question itself being evaded. This analysis reveals that post-question elaborations appear mostly to be associated with the informational contents negatively implicated in the question design and serve not only to contextualize the question itself but also to justify the act of questioning on the part of the interviewer.

Keywords:
news interview; question design; conversation analysis; post-question elaboration; Chinese context

References

Clayman, S. (1988) ‘Displaying neutrality in television news interview.’ Social Problems
35 (4), 474-492. https://doi.org/10.2307/800598

Clayman, S. (1992) ‘Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse.’ In: Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds) Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 163-198.

Clayman, S. (1993) ‘Reformulating the question: A device for answering/not answering
questions in news interviews and press conferences.’ Text & Talk 13 (2), 159.

Clayman, S. (2002). ‘Disagreements and third parties: Dilemmas of neutralism in panel
news interviews.’ Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10), 1385-1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00070-X

Clayman, S. and Heritage, J. (2002a) The News Interview – Journalists and Public Figures
on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clayman, S. and Heritage, J. (2002b) ‘Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference
and adversarialness in the press conference of Eisenhower and Regean.’ Journal of
Communication 52 (4), 749-755. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x

Eströma, M. (2009) ‘Announced refusal to answer: A study of norms and accountability
in broadcast news interview.’ Discourse Studies 11, 681-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609347232

Greatbatch, D. (1988) ‘A turn-taking system for British news interviews.’ Language in
Society 17, 401-430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012963

Harris, S. (1986) ‘Interviewers’ questions in broadcast interviews.’ In: Wilson, J. and
Crow, K. (eds) Besfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 8. Ulster:
University of Ulster. 50-85.

Heritage, J. (1985) ‘Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an ‘overhearing’ audience.’ In: van Dijk, T. (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis 3, Discourse and Dialogue. London: Academic Press. 95-119.

Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. (1991) ‘On the institutional character of institutional talk:
The case of news interviews.’ In: Boden, D. and Zimmerman, D. (eds) Talk and Social
Structure. Cambridge: Polity Press. 93-137.

Heritage, J. and Roth, A. (1995) ‘Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in
the broadcast news interview.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (1),
1-60. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2801_1

Hutchby, I. (1996) Confrontation Talk. Arguments, Asymmetries and Power on Talk
Radio. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hutchby, I. (2011a) ‘Non-neutrality and argument in the hybrid political interview.’
Discourse Studies 13 (3). 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611400665

Hutchby, I. (2011b) ‘Doing non-neutral: Belligerent interaction in the hybrid political
interview.’ In: Ekstrom, M. and Patrona, M. (eds) Talking Politics in Broadcast
Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing, Journalism and
Accountability. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 115-134.

Montgomery, M. (2005) ‘The discourse of war after 9/11.’ Language and Literature 14
(2), 149-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005051286

Montgomery, M. (2007) The Discourse of Broadcast Talk. London and New York:
Routledge.

Montgomery, M. (2008) ‘The discourse of the broadcast news interview: A typology.’
Journalism Studies 9 (2), 1-19.

Montgomery, M. (2011) ‘Chapter 2: The accountability interview, politics and change
in UK public service broadcasting’. In: Ekstrom, M. and Patrona, M. (eds) Talking
Politics in Broadcast Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Political Interviewing,
Journalism and Accountability. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 33-56.

Rendle-Short, J. (2007) ‘Neutralism and adversarial challenges in the political news
interview.’ Discourse & Communication 1 (4), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307082205

Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1992) ‘Towards an analysis of discourse.’ In: Coulthard,
M. (ed.) Advances in Spoken Discourse. London: Routledge. 1-34.

Tolson, A. (ed.) (2001) Television Talk Shows: Discourse, Performance, Spectacle.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Tolson, A. (2012) ‘“You’ll need a miracle to win this election” (J. Paxman 2005):
Interviewer assertiveness in UK general elections 1983-2010.’ Discourse, Context
& Media 1 (1), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2012.05.003

Metrics