Christoph Haase


In this contribution, a number of constructions of the type X CAUSE Y (and its morphosyntactic variants) are investigated under the perspective that the causer and the caused (and perhaps the causee) stand in a causal relationship but also in a relationship of different degrees of agency. The most obvious syntactic signature of this is the difference between active and passive sentences. It also offers the advantage to be quantifi ed and examined statistically. For this end, a corpus of academic texts from the natural sciences was queried and the frequencies and domains analysed. The fi ndings may help to improve understanding the rationale behind causal chaining and facilitate cause-effect comprehension for the reader due to inferencing in the ‘correct’ or reversed order. They further demonstrate that the scientifi c process (which involves the fi nding of natural laws by means of an establishment of cause-effect relationships) is gradually different in ‘softer’ sciences (which often operate on correlation instead of causation).


causation; agency; active-passive; corpus linguistics; English for Academic Purposes; EAP

Full Text:


Show references Hide references

Blevins, J. P. (2006) ‘English inflection and derivation.’ In: Aarts, B. and McMahon, A.
(eds) The Handbook of English Linguistics. Cambridge: Blackwell. 507-532.

Canagarajah, S. A. (2002) Critical Academic Writing and Multilingual Students. Ann
Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

Flaherty, M. G. (2011) The Textures of Time. Agency and Temporal Experience.
Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Flowerdew, L. (2008) ‘Determining discourse-based moves in professional reports.’ In:
Ädel, A. and Reppen, R. (eds) Corpora and Discourse. The Challenges of Different
Settings. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 117-134.

Haase, C. (2006) ‘Contrastive causation: A corpus view.’ In: Walinski, J., Kredens, K.,
and Gozdz-Roszkowski, S. (eds) Corpora and ICT in Language Studies. München:
Peter Lang. 341-359.

Haase, C. (2006) ‘A crosslinguistic view on causativity: Causer neglect.’ In: Povolna, R.,
and Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (eds) Discourse and Interaction 2. Brno Seminar on
Linguistic Studies in English: Proceedings. Brno: Masaryk University. 57-70.

Haase, C. (2009) ‘Resultative vs. causative event framing: Description, modelling,
problems.’ Discourse and Interaction 2/1, 33-47.

Haase, C. (2010) ‘Verb classes and the grammaticalization of causativity in discourse.’
In: Witczak-Plisiecka, I. (ed.) Pragmatic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics:
Speech Actions in Theory and Applied Studies. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge
Scholars. 379-394.

Haase, C. (2014) ‘A register approach to analogy in science texts: Popular vs. specialized
text types.’ Discourse and Interaction 7/1, 33-48.

Hyland, K. (2006) English for Academic Purposes. An Advanced Resource Book. London
and New York: Routledge.

Kulikov, L. (2006) ‘Passive in Indo-European. Reconstructing the early Vedic passive
paradigm.’ In: Abraham, W. and Leisiö, L. (eds) Passivization and Typology. Form
and Function. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 62-81.

Mackie, J. L. (1980) The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Clarendon
Library of Logic and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Römer, U. and Swales, J. (2010) ‘The Michigan corpus of upper-level student papers
(MICUSP).’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9/3, 249.

Swales, J. (1993) ‘Genre and engagement.’ Revue belge de philology et d’histoire 71/3,

Wiemer, B. (2006) ‘Relations between Actor-demoting devices in Lithuanian.’ In:
Abraham, W. and Leisiö, L. (eds) Passivization and Typology. Form and Function.
Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 274-309.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.