Bennett, K. (2007a) ‘Galileo’s revenge: Ways of construing knowledge and translation
strategies in the era of globalization.’ In: Salaama-Carr, M. (ed.) Translation and
Confl ict, Special issue of Social Semiotics, 17/2, 171-193.

Bennett, K. (2007b) ‘Epistemicide! The tale of a predatory discourse.’ In: Cunico, S. and
Munday, J. (eds) Translation and Ideology: Encounters and Clashes, Special ed. of
The Translator 13/2,151-169.

Bennett, K. (2015) ‘Towards an epistemological monoculture: Mechanisms of
epistemicide in European research publication.’ In: Plo, R. and Pérez-Llantada, C.
(eds) English as an Academic and Research Language (English in Europe. Vol. 2).
Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Berman, A. (1988) From the New Criticism to Deconstruction: The Reception of
Structuralism and Post-Structuralism. University of Illinois Press.

De Swaan, A. (2001) ‘English in the social sciences.’ In: Ammon, U. (ed.) The Dominance
of English as a Language of Science: Effects on Other Languages and Language
Communities. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 71-83.

Ding, D. (1998) ‘Rationality reborn: Historical roots of the passive voice in scientifi c
discourse.’ In: Battalio, J. (ed.) Essays in the Study of Scientifi c Discourse: Methods,
Practice and Pedagogy. Stamford: Ablex. 117-135.

Foucault, M. (2002, 1972 [1969]) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London and New
York: Routledge.

Gross, A. and Chesley, P. (2012) ‘Hedging, stance and voice in medical research articles.’
In: Hyland, K. and Sancho Guinda C. (eds) Stance and Voice in Written Academic
Genres. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 85-100.

Halliday, M. A. K and Martin, J. R. (1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive
Power. Pittsburgh and London: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Hyland, K. (1999a) ‘Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary
knowledge.’ Applied Linguistics 20/3, 341-367. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341

Hyland, K. (1999b) ‘Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles.’ In:
Candlin, C. and Hyland, K. (eds) Writing Texts: Processes and Practices. London and
New York: Longman. 99-121.

Hyland, K. (2000) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing.
Harlow: Longman.

Jelinek, E. and Demers, R. (1994) ‘Predicates and pronominal arguments in straits Salish.’
Language 70/4, 697-736. https://doi.org/10.2307/416325

Kuhn, T. S. ([1962] 1996) The Structure of Scientifi c Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.

Lillis, T. and Curry, M. J. (2010) Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and
Practices of Publishing in English. London and New York: Routledge.

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, transl. by
Bennington, G. and Massumi, B. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Mauranen, A. (1993) Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Frankfurt am Main:
Peter Lang.

Merton, R. K. ([1938] 2001) Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century
England. New York: Howard Fertig.

Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings.
Cambridge. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, G. (2001) ‘Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader.’
Applied Linguistics 22/1, 58-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58

Thompson, P. (2012) ‘Achieving a voice of authority in PhD theses.’ In: Hyland, K. and
Sancho Guinda, C. (eds) Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. London and
New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 119-130.

White, H. (1997) ‘The suppression of rhetoric in the nineteenth century.’ In: Schildgen,
B. D. (ed.) The Rhetoric Canon. Detroit: Wayne State University. 21-31.

Woods, P. (2006) Successful Writing for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. London and New
York: Routledge.