BUILDING AN ONLINE COMMUNITY: INGROUP FACE AND RELATIONAL WORK IN ONLINE DISCUSSIONS
Vol.7,No.1(2014)
altercasting; computer-mediated communication; discourse community; face; facework; ingroup; online discussions; rapport management; relational work; verbal antagonism
Angouri, J. and Tseliga, T. (2010) ‘ “you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING
ABOUT!” From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora.’ Journal of
Politeness Research 6, 57-82.
Bhatia, V. J. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. London and New
York: Continuum.
Bolander, B. (2013) Language and Power in Blogs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bousfield, D. (2013) ‘Face in confl ict.’ Journal of Language Aggression and Confl ict 1/1,
37-57. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.03bou
Bruxelles, S. and Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2004) ‘Coalitions in polylogues.’ Journal of
Pragmatics 36, 75-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00037-7
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992) ‘Think practically and act locally: Language
and gender as community-based practice.’ Annual Review of Anthropology 21, 461-
490. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2009) ‘Impoliteness and identity in the American news
media: The ‘Culture’ wars.’ Journal of Politeness Research 5/2, 273-303.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2010) ‘A genre approach to the study of (im)politeness.’
International Review of Pragmatics 2, 46-94. https://doi.org/10.1163/187731010X491747
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2013) ‘Face, identity, and im/politeness: Looking backwards,
moving forward – From Goffman to Practice Theory.’ Journal of Politeness Research
9/1, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0001
Goffman, E. (1955) ‘On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.’
Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18/3, 213-231. Reprinted in Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
Hardaker, C. (2010) ‘Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From
user discussions to academic defi nitions.’ Journal of Politeness Research 6, 215-242. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011
Hardaker, C. (2013) ‘ “Uh….not to be nitpicky….but…the past tense of drag is dragged,
not drug.”: An overview of trolling strategies.’ Journal of Language Aggression and
Confl ict 1/1, 58-86. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.04har
Harwood, N. (2009) ‘An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic
writing across two disciplines.’ Journal of Pragmatics 41, 497-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001
Haugh, M. (2013) ‘Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order.’ Journal of
Pragmatics 58, 52-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003
Hay, J. (2000) ‘Functions of humour in the conversations of men and women.’ Journal of
Pragmatics 32, 709-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00069-7
Hopkinson, C. (2012) ‘Antagonistic facework in online discussion fora.’ In: Hopkinson,
C., Tomášková, R., Zapletalová, G. (eds) The Interpersonal Function of Language
Across Genres and Discourse Domains. Ostrava: University of Ostrava. 113-153.
Hopkinson, C. (2013) ‘Trolling in online discussions: From provocation to communitybuilding.’
Brno Studies in English 39/1, 5-25. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2013-1-1
Hyland, K. (1998) ‘Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse.’
Journal of Pragmatics 30, 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5
Joseph, J. E. (2013) ‘Identity work and face work across linguistic and cultural boundaries.’
Journal of Politeness Research 9/1, 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0002
Kádár, D. Z. and Bax, M. M. H. (2013) ‘In-group ritual and relational work.’ Journal of
Pragmatics 58, 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.011
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2004) ‘Introducing polylogue.’ Journal of Pragmatics 36, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00034-1
Kleinke, S. (2010) ‘Interactive aspects of computer-mediated communication.’ In:
Tanskanen, S.-K., Helasvuo, M.-L., Raitaniemi, M. (eds) Discourses in Interaction.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 195-222.
Kreuz, R. and Roberts, R. (1995) ‘Two cues for verbal irony: Hyperbole and the ironic
tone of voice.’ Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1001_3
Lewis, D. (2005) ‘Arguing in English and French asynchronous online discussion.’
Journal of Pragmatics 37, 1801-1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.014
Locher, M. A. and Watts, R. J. (2005) ‘Politeness theory and relational work.’ Journal of
Politeness Research 1/1, 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
Locher, M. A. and Watts, R. J. (2008) ‘Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating
norms of linguistic behaviour.’ In: Bousfi eld, D. and Locher, M. A. (eds) Impoliteness
in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter. 77-99.
Lorenzo-Dus, N. and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2011) ‘On-line polylogues and
impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube
video.’ Journal of Pragmatics 43, 2578-2593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
McCall, G. J. (2003) ‘Interaction.’ In: Reynolds, L. T. and Herman-Kinney, N. J. (eds)
Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press. 327-348.
Milroy, L. (1980) Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
Neurauter-Kessels, M. (2011) ‘Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites.’
Journal of Politeness Research 7, 187-214. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.010
Perelmutter, R. (2013) ‘Klassika zhanra: The fl amewar as a genre in the Russian
blogosphere.’ Journal of Pragmatics 45, 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.006
Reid, E. (1999) ‘Hierarchy and power: Social control in cyberspace.’ In: Smith, M. and
Kollock, P. (eds) Communities in Cyberspace. London and New York: Routledge.
107-133.
Ruhi, S. (2010) ‘Face as an indexical category in interaction.’ Journal of Pragmatics 42,
2131-2146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.020
Sacks, H. (1972a) ‘An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for
doing sociology.’ In: Sudnow, D. N. (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction. New York:
Free Press. 31-74.
Sacks, H. (1972b) ‘On the analyzability of stories by children.’ In: Gumperz, J. J. and
Hymes, D. (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication.
New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 325-345.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007) ‘A tutorial on membership categorization.’ Journal of Pragmatics
39, 462-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
Schnurr, S. (2010) ‘Humour.’ In: Locher, M. A. and Graham, S. L. (eds) Interpersonal
Pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics 6). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
307-326.
Shum, W. and Lee, C. (2013) ‘(Im)politeness and disagreement in two Hong Kong Internet
discussion forums.’ Journal of Pragmatics 50, 52-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.010
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000) ‘Rapport management: A framework for analysis.’ In: Spencer-
Oatey, H. (ed.) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across
Cultures. London and New York: Continuum. 11-46.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2002) ‘Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to
explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations.’ Journal
of Pragmatics 34, 529-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00039-X
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007) ‘Theories of identity and the analysis of face.’ Journal of
Pragmatics 39, 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1979) ‘An integrative theory of intergroup confl ict.’ In:
Austin, W. G. and Worchel, S. (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.
Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. 33-47.
Upadhyay, S. R. (2010) ‘Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader
responses.’ Journal of Politeness Research 6, 105-127. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.006
Watts, R. J. (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waugh, L.R. (2010) ‘Pronominal choice in French conversational interaction: Indices of
national identity in identity acts.’ In: Tanskanen, S.-K., Helasvuo, M.-L., Raitaniemi,
M. (eds) Discourses in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 81-100.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, D. (2013) ‘Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective.’ Journal of
Pragmatics 59, 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.016

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2017 Discourse and Interaction