BUILDING RAPPORT IN AN ONLINE COMMUNITY VIA POSITIVE POLITENESS STRATEGIES
Vol.5,No.2(2012)
asynchronous computer-mediated communication; positive politeness strategies; face; gender
Androutsopoulos, J. (2006) ‘Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated
communication.’ Journal of Sociolinguistics 10/4, 419-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00286.x
Brown, P. (1998) ‘How and why are women polite: Some evidence from a Mayan
community.’ In: Coates, J. (ed.) Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell, 81-99.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1978) ‘Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena.’
In: Goody, E. N. (ed.) Questions and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Cameron, D. (2001) Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage.
Cherny, L. (1999) Conversation and Community: Chat in a Virtual World. Stanford: CSLI
Publications.
Coates, J. (1993) Women, Men and Politeness: a Sociolinguistic Account of Gender
Differences in Language. London: Longman.
Coates, J. (2007) ‘Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy.’ Journal of
Pragmatics 39/1, 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.05.003
Crawford, M. (2003) ‘Gender and humour in social context.’ Journal of Pragmatics 35/9,
1413-1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00183-2
Crystal, D. (2001) Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eelen, G. (2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publ.
Fraser, B. (1990) ‘Perspectives on politeness.’ Journal of Pragmatics 14/2, 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N
Fraser, B. and Nolen, W. (1981) ‘The association of deference with linguistic form.’
International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27, 93-109.
Graham, S. L. (2007) ‘Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a
computer-mediated community.’ Journal of Pragmatics 39/4, 742-759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017
Herring, S. (1996a) ‘Introduction.’ In: Herring, S. (ed.) Computer-Mediated
Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins. 1-10.
Herring, S. (1996b) ‘Two variants of an electronic message schema.’ In: Herring, S.
(ed.) Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural
Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 81-106.
Herring, S. (2001) ‘Computer-mediated discourse.’ In: Schiffrin, D., Tannen D. and
Hamilton, H. E. (eds) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
Ltd. 612-634.
Herring, S. and Paolillo, J. C. (2006) ‘Gender and genre variation in weblogs.’ Journal of
Sociolinguistics 10/4, 439-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00287.x
Hobbs, P. (2003) ‘The medium is the message: Politeness strategies in men’s and women’s
voice mail messages.’ Journal of Pragmatics 35/2, 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00100-5
Holmes, J. (1993) ‘New Zealand women are good to talk to: An analysis of politeness
strategies in interaction.’ Journal of Pragmatics 20/2, 91-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90078-4
Holmes, J. (1995) Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
Holmes, J. (2006) ‘Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humour and gender in the
workplace.’ Journal of Pragmatics 38/1, 26-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.007
Kasper, G. (1990) ‘Linguistic politeness: Current research issues.’ Journal of Pragmatics
14/2, 193-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90080-W
Kouper, I. (2010) ‘The pragmatics of peer advice in livejournal community.’ In:
Language@Internet 7/1. April 2010. Online document. 19 October 2011 <http://
www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2010/2464/?searchterm=kouper>.
Lakoff, R.T. (1973) ‘Language and Woman’s Place’. In: Language in Society 2/1, 45-80.
Lakoff, R. T. (2004) Language and Woman’s Place: Text and Commentaries. Bucholz, M.
(ed.) New York: Oxford University Press.
Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman Group Ltd.
Lewis, D. M. (2005) ‘Arguing in English and French asynchronous online discussion.’
Journal of Pragmatics 37/11, 1801-1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.014
Macaulay, M. (2001) ‘Tough talk: Indirectness and gender in requests for information.’
Journal of Pragmatics 33/2, 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00129-0
Marcoccia, M. (2004) ‘On-line polylogues: Conversation structure and participation
framework in Internet newsgroups.’ Journal of Pragmatics 36/1, 115-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00038-9
Norrick, N. R. (1994) ‘Involvement and joking in conversation.’ Journal of Pragmatics
22/3-4, 409-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90117-1
Panyametheekul S. and Herring S. (2003) ‘Gender and turn allocation in a Thai chat
room.’ In: Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9/1. Nov 2003. Online
document. 25 July 2005 <http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/panya_herring.html>.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2002) ‘Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to
explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations.’ Journal
of Pragmatics 34/5, 529-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00039-X
Tannen, D. (1994) Gender and Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, J. (1996) Meaning in Interaction. An Introduction to Pragmatics. London:
Longman.
Trávníková, P. (2012) ‘Speaking and writing in computer-mediated communication.’
In: Headlandová Kalischová, I. and Jančaříková, R. (eds) Approaches to Discourse:
Proceedings. Brno: Masaryk University. 43-55.
Xie, Ch. (2003) ‘A critique of politeness theories: Review of Gino Eelen Manchester: St.
Jerome Publishing, 2001, viii+280 pages, paperback, £17.99.’ Journal of Pragmatics
35/5, 811-818.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2017 Discourse and Interaction