ON THE PRESENTATIONAL CAPACITY OF THETIC-LIKE SENTENCES

Martin Adam

doi:10.5817/DI2012-2-5

ON THE PRESENTATIONAL CAPACITY OF THETIC-LIKE SENTENCES

Vol.5,No.2(2012)

Martin Adam

https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2012-2-5

PDF

Abstract

Within the Firbasian framework of the theory of FSP, sentences are understood to implement either the Presentation Scale or the Quality Scale; the author’s research into the area of FSP has recently dealt with the role of the English verb operating in Presentation Scale sentences (Pr-sentences) (Adam 2011, 2012; cf. 2009). In addition to the existential there-construction, it is the configuration of the rhematic subject in preverbal position that seems to convey existence/appearance on the scene most frequently in English (A cruel smile hovered over her face). The present corpus-based paper proposes to shed light on the structure and the function of a rather specific type of Pr-sentences patterning as relatively short structures with a tentatively context-independent subject (The potatoes are boiling). Such sentences functionally resemble statements that came to be labelled as “thetic” or sometimes “all-new sentences” (Mathesius 1975: 87, Firbas 1992: 86-87, cf. Kuroda 1972, Lewis 2001). The point is that even though from the static point of view (i.e. that of lexical semantics) such sentences do not suggest the characteristic of appearance/existence, they do not appear to be excluded from expressing presentation on the scene.

Keywords:
FSP; presentation; scale; thetic; sentences

References

Adam, M. (2009) Functional Macrofield Perspective (A Religious Discourse Analysis
Based on FSP). Brno: Masaryk University.

Adam, M. (2010) ‘A functional characterology of the English transitional Pr-Verbs:
Presentation or appearance on the scene revisited.’ Ostrava Journal of English
Philology 2, 7-20.

Adam, M. (2011) ‘Towards a syntactic-semantic typology of presentation scale sentences
in fiction narratives.’ Brno Studies in English 37, 5-19. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2011-1-1

Adam, M. (2012) Presentation Sentences and English Presentation Verbs at the Syntactic-
Semantic Interface. (An unpublished habilitation thesis). Masaryk University, Brno.

Brentano, F. (1874) Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt [Psychology from an
Empirical Point of View]. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

Chamonikolasová, J. (2005) ‘Dynamic semantic scales in the theory of functional
sentence Perspective’. In: Panevová, J. and Vidová-Hladká, B. (eds) Aleg(r)ace pro
Evu. Papers in Honour of Eva Hajičová. Praha: MFF UK. 61-67.

Chamonikolasová, J. (2010) ‘Communicative perspectives in the theory of FSP.’
Linguistica Pragensia 20/2, 86-93. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10017-010-0006-2

Chamonikolasová, J. and Adam, M. (2005) ‘The presentation scale in the theory of
functional sentence perspective.’ In: Čermák, J. (ed) Patterns (A Festschrift for Libuše
Dušková). Prague: Charles University. 59-69.

Dušková, L. (1988) Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny [Grammar of Present-
Day English on the Background of Czech]. Prague: Karolinum.

Dušková, L. (1998) ‘Syntactic forms of the presentation and their differentiation.’
Linguistica Pragensia 8, 36-43.

Dušková, L. (1999) Studies in the English Language. Part II. Prague: Karolinum.

Dušková, L. (2005) ‘From the heritage of Vilém Mathesius and Jan Firbas: Syntax in
the service of FSP.’ In: Chovanec, J. (ed) Theory and Practice in English Studies 3:
Proceedings from 8th Brno Conference of English, American and Canadian Studies.
Brno: Masaryk University. 7-23.

Firbas, J. (1964) ‘On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis.’ Travaux
Linguistiques de Prague 1, 267-80.

Firbas, J. (1986) ‘On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of
functional sentence perspective.’ In: Cooper, C. R. and Greenbaum, S. (eds) Studying
Writing: Linguistic Approaches. Beverly Hills: Sage. 40-71.

Firbas, J. (1992) Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Firbas, J. (1995) ‘On the thematic and the rhematic layers of a text.’ In: Wårwik, B.,
Tauskanen, S.-K. and Hiltunen, R. (eds) Organization in Discourse: Proceedings from
the Turku Conference. Anglicana Turkuensia 14. Turku: University of Turku. 59-72.

Hurtová, Z. (2009) Firbasian Non-thematic Layers in Paragraphs and Beyond. Ostrava:
Ostravská univerzita.

Kaltenböck, G., Heine B. and Kuteva, T. (2011) ‘On thetical grammar.’ Studies in
Language 35/ 4, 848-893.

Kuroda, S.-Y. (1972) ‘The categorical and the thetic judgment.’ Foundations of Language
9, 153-185.

Ladusaw, W. (1994) ‘Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong.’ In:
Harvey, M. and Santelmann, L. (eds) Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic
Theory IV. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 220-229.

Lewis S.-M. (2001) Rethinking the Existence of the Thetic Judgment. (Unpublished MA
thesis). Swarthmore: Swarthmore College.

Marty, A. (1908) Untersuchungen zur Sprachphilosophie und Grammatik. Halle:
Niemeyer.

Mathesius, V. (1975) A Functional Analysis of Present Day English on a General
Linguistic Basis. Praha: Academia.

Rohrauer, L. and Dubec, P. (2011) ‘Syntactic and FSP aspects of the existential
construction.’ Linguistica Pragensia 21/1, 24-32.

Sasse, H.-J. (1987) ‘The thetic/categorical distinction revisited.’ Linguistics 25, 511-580.

Sæbø, K. J. (2006) ‘Focus interpretation in thetic statements: Alternative semantics and
optimality theory pragmatic.’ Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16, 15-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-006-9021-2

Svoboda, A. (2005) ‘Firbasian semantic scales and comparative studies.’ In: Čermák, J.,
Klégr, A., Malá, M. and Šaldová, P. (eds) Patterns (A Festschrift for Libuše Dušková).
Prague: Charles University. 217-229.

Svoboda, A. (2006) ‘Firbasovy sémantické škály a komunikační strategie [Firbasian
semantic scales and communicative strategy].’ In: Hubáček, J. (ed) Pocta Evě
Mrhačové. Ostrava: Ostrava University. 215-227.

Metrics