Politeness strategies in academic digital discourse

Gabriela Miššíková

doi:10.5817/DI2012-1-49

Politeness strategies in academic digital discourse

Vol.5,No.1(2012)

Gabriela Miššíková

https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2012-1-49

PDF

Abstract

The paper explores the discourse strategies used in academic discourse in the informal setting of a personal web page. The aim is to study a digital variation of academic discourse that blends features of spoken and written academic discourse. It typically provides spontaneous responses using direct ways of expressing ideas. Unlike scholarly discussions at conferences, academic etiquette and diplomatic language are not always maintained and personal attacks and emotive statements occur; participants tend to express their preferences, professional standpoints, ideas and personal attitudes frankly and openly. Expressing criticism and disagreement, the participants may or may not use politeness strategies to mitigate face-threatening responses. Mapping the variety of these strategies, I work with those parts of academic web pages that are devoted to vivid and uncensored discussions of the subject matter. The analysis is theoretically rooted in the conception of interpersonal rhetoric as defined by Leech (1983). The research draws from a corpus of articles and related responses randomly chosen from personal and institutional academic web pages.

Keywords:
academic digital discourse; implicating vs. explicating; expressing and taking criticism

References

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1996) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2012) ‘Understanding and believing: Interpreting pragmatic
meanings in political discourse.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R.
(eds) Discourse Interpretation: Approaches and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne:
Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 79-112.

Grice, H. P. (1975) ‘Logic and conversation.’ In: Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds) Syntax and
Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 41-58.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1973) Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward
Arnold.

Hyland, K. (2010) ‘Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional
science.’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9/2, 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003

Leech, G. N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. Harlow: Longman.

Lencho, M. W. (2011) ‘The changing face of Facebook: Building reflexivity into automated
online discourse routine.’ Topics in Linguistics: Discourse Analysis in a Digital World
8/2, 34-40.

Miššíková, M. (2012) ‘Cooperation and politeness in literary discourse: A pragmatic
stylistic approach.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) Discourse
Interpretation: Approaches and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge
Scholars Publishing. 149-162.

Povolná, R. (2009) ‘Some discourse markers used to express politeness in spoken
academic iscourse.’ In: Kuzniak, M. and Rozwadowska, B. (eds) Studies in Language
and Methodology of Teaching Foreign Languages, PASE Papers 2008. Wroclaw:
Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT, Wroclaw 2009. 155-164.

Metrics