Gendered talk: Taboo language in Internet Relay Chat

Vol.4,No.1(2011)

Abstract
One of the well-established sociolinguistic stereotypes is the concept of woman as a gentle and delicate creature whose language tallies with this notion. Women are brought up to mind their manners and be in command of their choice of vocabulary markedly more than men. Recent studies indicate that the correlation between gender and taboo language is context-dependent. Research shows that both men and women use more crude expressions in the same-sex conversation and that the usage of swear words decreases in mixed-sex conversations. In narratives, however, women tend to increase the use of taboo language in order to accommodate to the male norm, in contrast with men who tend to use fewer profanities. The paper wishes to present partial results of an ongoing survey into computer-mediated communication (CMC). As the most anonymous and fl eeting CMC environment, chat accentuates the virtues and vices of the cyberspace communication – it lessens the pressure of social expectations and gives the impression of impunity. The present study adopts the community of practice framework and examines how this specifi c context infl uences the use of taboo language in IRC (Internet Relay Chat) in terms of gender differences.

Keywords:
swear words; taboo language; women’s language; men’s language; Internet Relay Chat (IRC); gender; community of practice; context
References

Allan, K. and Burridge, K. (2006) Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Bayard, D. and Krishnayya, S. (2001) ‘Gender, expletive use, and context: Male and
female expletive use in structured and unstructured conversation among New Zealand
University students.’ Women and Language 24/1, 1-15.


Cameron, D. (1997) ‘Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction
of heterosexual masculinity.’ In: Johnson, S. and Meinfof, U. (eds) Language and
Masculinity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. 47-64.


Chambers, J. K. and Trudgill, P. (1998) Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.


Coates, J. (2004) Women, Men, and Language. 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman.


Coates, J. (2003) Men Talk: Stories in the Making of Masculinities. Oxford: Blackwell.


Crawford, M. (1995) Talking Difference. London: Sage.


Danet, B. 1998. ‘Text as mask: Gender, play and performance on the Internet.’ In: Jones
S. G. (ed.) Cybersociety 2.0: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community
Revisited. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. 129-158.


Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003) Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.

Herring, S. C. (1993) ‘Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication.’
Electronic Journal of Communication 3(2). Online document. Retrieved on 12 July
2010. <http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v3n293.htm>.


Herring, S. C. (1994) ‘Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: Bring
familiar baggage to the new frontier.’ Online document. Retrieved on 10 September
2010. <http://www.eff.org/pub/Net_culture/Gender_issues/cmc_and_gender.article>.
Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (1999) ‘The community of practice: Theories and
methodologies in language and gender research.’ Language in Society 28/2,
173–183.


Jay, T. (2000) Why We Curse. Philadelphia: John Benjamin.


Jay, T. (2009) ‘The utility and ubiquity of taboo words.’ Perspectives on Psychological
Science 4/2, 153-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01115.x

Jespersen, O. (1922) Language: Its Development, Nature and Origin. London: George
Allen & Unwin Ltd.


Lakoff, R. (2004) Language and Woman’s Place: Text and Commentaries. (edited by
Bucholtz, M.) Revised and expanded ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Litosseliti, L. and Sunderland, J. (2002) Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


McEnery, T. (2006) Swearing in English: Bad Language, Purity and Power from 1586 to
the Present. Oxon: Routlege.


Mehl, M. R., Vazire, S., Ramírez-Esparza, N., Slatcher, R. B. and Pennbaker, J. W. (2007)
‘Are females really more talkative than males?’ Science 317, 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139940


Montagu, A. (1967) The Anatomy of Swearing. New York: Macmillan.


Rodino, M. (1997) ‘Breaking out of binaries: Reconceptualizing gender and its relationship
to language in computer-mediated communication.’ Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication 3(3). Online document. Retrieved on 28 August 2010. <http:// www.
ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue3/rodino.html>


Romaine, S. (1999) Communicating Gender. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


Savicki, V., Lingenfelter, D. and Kelley, M. (1996) ‘Gender language style and group
composition in Internet discussion groups.’ Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication 2(3). Online document. Retrieved on 28 August 2010. <http:// www.
ascusc. org/jcmc/vol2/issue3/savicki.html>


Stapleton, K. (2003) ‘Gender and swearing: A community practice.’ Women and Language
26/2, 22-33.


Sunderland, J. (2006) Language and Gender. London: Routlege.


Tannen, D. (1994) Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Thelwall, M. (2008) ‘Fk yea I swear: Cursing and gender in MySpace.’ Corpora 3/1,
83-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503208000087


Trudgill, P. (1974) The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.

Metrics

465

Views

423

PDF views