The power of questioning: A case study of courtroom discourse

Vol.3,No.2(2010)

Abstract
The article discusses linguistic approaches to power and deals with question-answer types of interaction in institutional discourse. The main focus is on discursive tools available to participants with an institutional status and the way these powerful participants restrict their interlocutors through questioning. The article starts with introducing general principles applicable to all institutional discourse types; it then proceeds to demonstrating these principles on a detailed analysis of several extracts from courtroom discourse.

Keywords:
institutional discourse; courtroom discourse; cross-examination; discursive resources; pragmatic strategies; power; closed questions; open questions
References

Aldridge, M. and Luchjenbroers, J. (2007) ‘Linguistic manipulation in legal discourse:
Framing questions and “smuggling” information.’ International Journal of Speech,
Language and the Law 14/1, 85-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v14i1.85


Bülow-Møller, A. M. (1992) ‘The notion of coercion in courtroom questioning.’ (Eric
Document Reproduction Service No. ED 359752).


Chang, Y. (2004) ‘Courtroom questioning as a culturally situated persuasive genre of
talk.’ Discourse and Society 15/6, 705-722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504046501


Cotterill, J. (2003) Language and Power in Court: A Linguistic Analysis of the
O.J. Simpson Trial. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.


Cotterill, J. (2004) ‘Collocation, connotation, and courtroom semantics: Lawyers’ control
of witness testimony through lexical negotiation.’ Applied Linguistics 25/4, 513-537.


Danet, B., Hoffman, K., Kermish, N., Rafn, J. and Stayman, D. (1980) ‘An ethnography
of questioning in the courtroom.’ In: Shuy, R. W. and Shnukal, A. (eds) Language Use
and the Uses of Language. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 171-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.4.513


Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992) ‘Analysing talk at work: An introduction.’ In: Drew, P.
and Heritage, J. (eds) Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3-65.


Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.


Frankel, R. (1990) ‘Talking in interviews: A dispreference for patient-initiated questions
in physician-patient encounters.’ In: Psathas, G. (ed.) Interaction Competence.
Washington, DC: University Press of America. 231-262.


Gibbons, J. (2003) Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice
System. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.


Johnson, A. (2002) ‘So…?: Pragmatic implications of so-prefaced questions in formal
police interviews.’ In: Cotterill, J. (ed.) Language in the Legal Process. Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan. 91-110.


Haworth, K. (2006) ‘The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse.’
Discourse and Society 17/6, 739-759.


Heffer, C. (2005) The Language of Jury Trial: A Corpus-Aided Analysis of Legal–Lay
Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Heritage, J. (2002) ‘The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question
content.’ Journal of Pragmatics 34, 1427-1446.


Heydon, G. (2005) The Language of Police Interviewing: A Critical Analysis. Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan.


Hobbs, P. (2002) ‘Tipping the scales of justice: Deconstructing an expert’s testimony on
cross-examination.’ International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 15, 411-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021211730968


Hobbs, P. (2003) ‘“You must say it for him”: Reformulating a witness’ testimony on crossexamination
at Trial.’ Text 23/4, 477-511.


Hutchby, I. (1996) ‘Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio
show.’ Discourse and Society 7/4, 481-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926596007004003


Levinson, S. C. (1992) ‘Activity types and language.’ In: Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds)
Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. 66-100.


Luchjenbroers, J. (1997) ‘“In your own words …” Questions and answers in a supreme
court trial.’ Journal of Pragmatics 27, 477-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00033-1


Matoesian, G. (2005) ‘Nailing down an answer: Participations of power in trial talk.’
Discourse Studies 7/6, 733-759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605055424


Matoesian, G. (2008) ‘You might win the battle but lose the war: Multimodal, interactive,
and extralinguistic aspects of witness resistance.’ Journal of English Linguistics 36/3,
195-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424208321202


Newbury, P. and Johnson, A. (2006) ‘Suspects’ resistance to constraining and coercive
questioning strategies in the police interview.’ The International Journal of Speech,
Language and the Law 13/2, 213-240.


Raymond, G. (2003) ‘Grammar and social organisation: Yes/no interrogatives and the
structure of responding.’ American Sociological Review 68, 939-967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752


Sacks, H. (1974) ‘A simplest systematics for the organisation of the turn-taking for
conversation.’ Language 50/4, 696-735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010


Thornborrow, J. (2001) ‘Questions, control and the organisation of talk in calls to a radio
phone-in.’ Discourse Studies 3/1, 119-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003001006


Thornborrow, J. (2002) Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse.
London: Longman.


Tkačuková, T. (2010) Lay People as Cross-Examiners: A Linguistic Analysis of the Libel
Case McDonald’s Corporation v. Helen Steel and David Morris. An unpublished
Ph.D. dissertation. Brno: Masaryk University.


Tracy, K. and Robles, J. (2009) ‘Questions, questioning, and institutional practices: An
introduction.’ Discourse Studies 11/2, 131-152.


Wang, J. (2006) ‘Questions and the exercise of power.’ Discourse and Society 17/4,
529-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506063127


Woodbury, H. (1984) ‘The strategic use of questions in court.’ Semiotica 48/3-4,
197-228.

Metrics

755

Views

1633

PDF views