Some notes on the interface of communicative dynamism and prosodic prominence as constituents of auctorial communicative strategy

Martin Adam

Some notes on the interface of communicative dynamism and prosodic prominence as constituents of auctorial communicative strategy

Vol.3,No.2(2010)

PDF

With a few honourable exceptions (most recently Chamonikolasová 2007, 2009 and Headlandová Kalischová 2009, 2010), within the research in the ﬁ eld of the Firbasian theory of functional sentence perspective (FSP), the interplay of factors operating in spoken discourse seems to play a somewhat marginal role. It is its written counterpart that wins the scholars’ attention most of the time. The present paper deals with a functional comparison of the distribution of the degrees of communicative dynamism (CD) and that of the degrees of prosodic prominence (PP) in spoken discourse, their interplay, and its possible (aesthetic) effects. Drawing above all on the ﬁ ndings presented by Firbas, the author discusses the results of his own investigation into the area of FSP based on an authentic short text sample. Research has shown (Firbas 1995, Svoboda 2006, Adam 2009, Hurtová 2009) that the author’s communicative purpose is typically related to the aesthetic function carried by the text and determines the communicative strategies employed.

Keywords:
FSP; communicative dynamism; prosodic prominence; communicative strategy; aesthetic function

References

Adam, M. (2007) A Handbook of Functional Sentence Perspective (FSP in Theory and
Practice). Brno: Masaryk University.

Adam, M. (2009) Functional Macrofi eld Perspective (A Religious Discourse Analysis
Based on FSP). Brno: Masaryk University.

Chamonikolasová, J. (2007) Intonation in English and Czech Dialogues. Brno: Masaryk
University.

Chamonikolasová, J. (2009) ‘Communicative dynamism and prosodic prominence of
English and Czech pronouns.’ In: Procházka, M., Šaldová, P. and Malá, M. (eds) The
Prague School and Theories of Structure. Göttingen: V&R Unipress. 143-159.

Cruttenden, A. (1986) Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. and Davy, D. (1969) Investigating English Style. London: Longman.

Daneš, F. (1987) ‘On Prague School functionalism in linguistics.’ In: Driven, R. and Fried,
V. (eds) Functionalism in Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3-38.

Firbas, J. (1986) ‘On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of
functional sentence perspective.’ In: Cooper, C. R. and Greenbaum, S. (eds) Studying
Writing: Linguistic Approaches. Beverly Hills: Sage. 40-71.

Firbas, J. (1992) Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Firbas, J. (1995) ‘On the thematic and the rhematic layers of a text.’ In: Wårvik, B.,
Tanskanen, S.-K. and Hiltunen, R. (eds) Organization in Discourse: Proceedings from
the Turku Conference, Anglicana Turkuensia 14. Turku: University of Turku. 59-72.

Gabelentz, G. von der (1891) Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und
bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Weigel.

Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004 [1985]) An Introduction to
Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Headlandová Kalischová, I. (2010) Intonation in Discourse: English Intonation as
(Mis)used by Czech Speakers. Brno: Masaryk University.

Headlandová Kalischová, I. (2009) ‘Tendencies in intonation centre placement in
utterances of Czech users of English and the possible effect on discourse coherence.’
In: Hůlková, I. and Jančaříková, R. (eds) Exploring Cohesion and Coherence in
English Discourse. Brno: Masaryk University. 65-73.

Hébert, L. (2007) Dispositifs pour l’analyse des textes et des images. Limoges: Presses de
l’Université de Limoges.

Hurtová, Z. (2009) Firbasian Non-thematic Layers in Paragraphs and Beyond. Ostrava:
Ostravská univerzita.

Jakobson, R. (1960) ‘Linguistics and poetics.’ In: Sebeok, T. A. (ed.) Style in Language.
Cambridge: MIT Press. 350-377.

Klinkenberg, J.-M. (1996) Précis de sémiotique générale. Paris: Seuil.

Marty, A. (1884) ‘Über subjektlose Sätze und das Verhältnis der Grammatik zur Logik
und Psychologie.’ Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 8, 56-94.

O’Connor, J. D. and Arnold, G. F. (1973) Intonation of Colloquial English. London:
Longman.

Svoboda, A. (1989) Kapitoly z funkční syntaxe. Prague: SPN.

Svoboda, A. (2006) ‘Firbasovy sémantické škály a komunikační strategie.’ In: Hubáček,
J., Dokoupil, L., Holý, P. and Vašutová, M. (eds) Pocta Evě Mrhačové. Ostrava:
Ostravská univerzita. 215-227.

Weil, H. (1844 [1978]) De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparees aux
langues modernes. [The Order of Words in the ancient languages compared with that
of the modern languages]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Metrics

204

Views

162

PDF views

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

PDF