Initial I think: Main or comment clause?

Vol.2,No.1(2009)

Abstract
This paper explores the use of 200 occurrences of clause-initial I think in a corpus of spoken English with a view to establishing whether they are best classifi ed as main or comment clauses. It investigates two formal cues for signalling prominence of I think and hence a possible hierarchical difference between the two clauses: (i) the presence or absence of the that-complementizer as an explicit marker of syntactic subordination and (ii) prosodic prominence. The corpus data show that a difference on the structural level, i.e. that vs. zero, does not correspond with different prosodic behaviour. Both constructional types exhibit a similar distribution of the three prosodic patterns identifi ed: they are both most frequently realised as heads, less frequently as pre-heads, and only rarely with a separate nuclear accent. From a cognitive-functional perspective, which associates superordinate status with relative prominence, initial I think therefore only rarely qualifi es for main clause status. Moreover, the corpus data suggest that in spoken language the that-complementizer is not so much used as a marker of subordination but rather as a fi ller used to give weight to I think or for rhythmical purposes.

Keywords:
prosody; parenthetical; comment clause; main clause; corpus analysis; spoken language; that-complementizer
References

Aijmer, K. (1972) Some Aspects of Psychological Predicates in English. Stockholm:
Almqvist & Wiksell.


Aijmer, K. (1997) ‘I think – an English modal particle.’ In: Swan, T., Westvik, O. J. (eds)
Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter. 1-47.


Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of
Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.


Boersma, P., Weenink, D. (2008). ‘Praat: doing phonetics by computer.’ (Version 4.4.33)
[Computer programme] Retrieved December 2005 from http://www.praat.org


Boye, K., Harder, P. (2007) ‘Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic
structure.’ Studies in Language 31/3, 569-606.


Brazil, D. (1997) The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.


Brinton, L. J. (1996) Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse
Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.


Clark, H. (2004) ‘Pragmatics of language performance.’ In: Horn, L. R., Ward, G. (eds)
Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. 365-382.


Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1986) An Introduction to English Prosody. London: Edward Arnold.


Cruttenden, A. (1997) Intonation. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Davidson, D. (2001). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.


Dehé, N. (2007) ‘The relation between syntactic and prosodic parenthesis.’ In: Dehé, N.,
Kavalova, Y. (eds) Parentheticals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 261-284.


Elsness, J. (1984) ‘That or zero? A look at the choice of object clause connective in a
corpus of American English.’ English Studies 65, 519-33. DOI: 10.1080/00138388408598357


Erteschik-Shir, N., Lappin, S. (1979) ‘Dominance and the functional explanation of island
phenomena.’ Theoretical Linguistics 6/1, 41-86. DOI: 10.1515/thli.1979.6.1-3.41


Fischer, O. (2007) ‘The development of English parentheticals: A case of
grammaticalization?’ In: Smit, U. Dollinger, S. Hüttner, J., Kaltenböck, G.,
Lutzky, U. (eds) Tracing English Through Time. Wien: Braumüller. 99-114.


Givón, T. (1984) Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.


Hand, M. (1993) ‘Parataxis and parentheticals.’ Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 495-507. DOI: 10.1007/BF00986209


Huddleston, R., Pullum, G. K. (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Jaeger, F. T. (2005) ‘Optional that indicates production diffi culty: Evidence from
disfl uencies.’ Proceedings of DiSS’05 Disfl uency in Spontaneous Speech Workshop.
10-12 September 2005, Aix-en-Provence, France. 103-109.


Kaltenböck, G. (2006) ‘‘... That is the question’: Complementizer omission in extraposed
that-clauses.’ English Language and Linguistics 10/2, 371-396.


Kaltenböck, G. (2007) ‘Position, prosody, and scope: The case of English comment
clauses.’ Vienna English Working Papers (VIEWS) 16, 3-38.


Kaltenböck, G. (2008) ‘Prosody and function of English comment clauses.’ Folia
Linguistica 42/1, 83-134.

Kaltenböck, G. (2009 forthc.) ‘Pragmatic functions of parenthetical I think.’ In:
Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W., Schneider, S. (eds) New Approaches to Hedging.
Amsterdam: Elsevier.


Kärkkäinen, E. (2003) Epistemic Stance in English Conversation. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.


Kärkkäinen, E. (2009 forthc.) ‘Position and scope of epistemic phrases in planned and
unplanned American English.’ In: Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W., Schneider, S. (eds)
New Approaches to Hedging. Amsterdam: Elsevier.


Kearns, K. (2007) ‘Epistemic verbs and zero complementizer.’ English Language and
Linguistics 11/3, 475-505. DOI: 10.1017/S1360674307002353


Kruisinga, E. (1932) A Handbook of Present-Day English. Part II. Groningen:
Noordhoff.


Lepore, E., Loewer, B. (1989) ‘You can say that again.’ In: French, P., Uehling, T. E.,
Wettstein, H. K. (eds) Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Vol. XIV. Notre Dame, Ind.:
University of Notre Dame Press. 338-56.


Langacker, R. W. (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol II: Descriptive
Applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.


Mackenzie, J. L. (1984) ‘Communicative functions of subordination.’ In: Mackenzie, J. L.,
Wekker, H. (eds) English Language Research: The Dutch Contribution I. Amsterdam:
Free University Press. 67-84.


Mindt, I. (2003) ‘Is I think a discourse marker?’ In: Mengel, E., Schmid,
H.-J., Steppat, M. (eds) Proceedings Anglistentag 2002 Bayreuth. Trier: WVT. 473-
483.


Nelson, G., Wallis, S., Aarts, B. (2002) Exploring Natural Language. Working with
the British Component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.


Nuyts, J. (2000) ‘Tensions between discourse structure and conceptual semantics: The
syntax of epistemic modal expressions.’ Studies in Language 23/1, 103-135. DOI: 10.1075/sl.24.1.05nuy


Peterson, P. (1999) ‘On the boundaries of syntax: Non-syntagmatic relations.’ In: Collins,
P., Lee, D. (eds) The Clause in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 229-250.


Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of
the English Language. Harlow: Longman.


Ross, J. R. (1973) ‘Slifting.’ In: Gross, M., Halle, M., Schützenberger, M.-P. (eds) The
Formal Analysis of Natural Languages. The Hague: Mouton. 133-169.


Sadock, J. M. (1984) ‘The pragmatics of subordination.’ In: Geest, W. de, Putseys, Y.
(eds) Sentential Complementation. Dordrecht: Foris. 205-213.


Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (2000) ‘The functions of I think in political discourse.’
International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10/1, 41-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2000.tb00139.x


Stenström, A.-B. (1995) ‘Some remarks on comment clauses.’ In: Aarts, B., Meyer, C. F.
(eds) The Verb in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
290-299.


Svensson, J. (1976) ‘Reportindicators and other parentheticals.’ In: Karlsson, F. (ed.)
Papers from the Third Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Turku: Textlinguistics
Research Group, Academy of Finland. 369-380.


Thompson, S. A. (2002) ‘‘Object complements’ and conversation. Towards a realistic
account.’ Studies in Language 26/1, 125-164. DOI: 10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho


Thompson, S. A., Mulac, A. (1991) ‘The discourse conditions for the use of the
complementizer that in conversational English.’ Journal of Pragmatics 15, 237-251. DOI: 10.1016/0378-2166(91)90012-M

Tomlin, R. (1985) ‘Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination.’
Text 5, 85-122.


Urmson, J. O. (1952) ‘Parenthetical verbs.’ Mind 61, 480-496.


Wells. J. C. (2006) English Intonation. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.


Wichmann, A. (2000) Intonation in Text and Discourse. Beginnings, Middles and Ends.
Harlow: Longman.


Wichmann, A. (2001) ‘Spoken parentheticals.’ In: Aijmer, K. (ed.) A Wealth of English.
Studies in Honour of Göran Kjellmer. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgiensis.
177-193.

Metrics

325

Views

164

PDF views