Ways of addressing in legal discourse

Eva Pavlíčková

Ways of addressing in legal discourse

Vol.1,No.1(2008)

PDF

The author’s attention is focused on the ways of addressing in legal discourse. The analysis is aimed primarily at the expressions, and word-formative suffi xes used for referring to contractual parties, differentiating their role and stating a relation between them. In addition to this, the goal of the author’s interest is the deictic expression used for making reference to a person, thing, idea, etc., which is nearer or further away in place, time, thought (this/these – that/those, here – there) as well as a special kind of legal deictic expressions such as hereby, whereby, hereinafter.

References

Brown, G., Yule, G. (1983) Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Chorvátová, I., Mokráň, P. (1987) Právnický slovník anglicko-slovenský, slovensko-
-anglický. Bratislava: Centrum cudzích jazykov.

Curzon, L. B. (1979) A Dictionary of Law. Plymouth: MacDonald & Evans Ltd.

Dictionary of Law (1993) Teddington: Peter Collin Publishing Ltd.

Gibbons, J. (1994) ‘Introduction: Language constructing law.’ In: Gibbons, J. (ed.)
Language and the Law. New York: Longman Group UK Limited. 3-10.

Hatch, E. (1992) Discourse and Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Levinson, S.C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. (1985) Essex: Longman.

Longman Dictionary of the English Language (1984) Essex: Longman.

Maley, Y. (1994) ‘The language of the law.’ In: Gibbons, J. (ed.) Language and the Law.
New York: Longman Group UK Limited. 11-50.

Widdowson, H. G. (1996) Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deixis

Yule, G. (1996) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Metrics

234

Views

469

PDF views

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

PDF