Lexical bundles in academic articles from arts disciplines
Vol.18,No.2(2025)
Discourse and Interaction
This paper studies lexical bundles in academic articles in the fields of photography, product/industrial design and audiovisual arts disciplines. The comparative corpus study presents a quantitative and qualitative analysis of formal and functional types of 4-grams used in published articles by expert authors in the three arts disciplines. The analysis was based on Biber et al.’s (1999) formal taxonomy and Hyland’s (2008a, 2008b) functional taxonomy of lexical bundles. The results show that both photography and audiovisual arts disciplines have similar utilisation of formal and functional types of bundles, prioritising content-oriented rhetorical functions. However, the discipline of product/industrial design shows a stronger preference for participant-oriented functions that utilise a distancing, hedging type of bundle. The findings help teachers of academic writing to identify the objective language needs of PhD students for writing in these disciplines. Writing instruction can be more precise with respect to disciplinary conventions in the creative arts disciplines. These disciplines have been overlooked in most of the English for Specific Academic Purposes teaching materials.
academic writing; corpus analysis; genre; lexical bundles; needs analysis
Hana Atcheson
Tomas Bata University in Zlín
Hana Atcheson is a lecturer at the Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic. She is a coordinator and curriculum planner of English courses at the Faculty of Multimedia Communication. Her research interests are in pragmatic and lexical approaches to language teaching, corpus linguistics methods for TESOL, and genre analysis for ESAP.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1982). The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586464
Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275–311. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib
Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers.
English for Specific Purposes, 26, 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2003). Towards a taxonomy of lexical bundles in speech and writing. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus linguistics by the Lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 71–92). Peter Lang.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120101300346831
CASS, ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science. (n.d.). Log ratio—Aninformal introduction. https://cass.lancs.ac.uk/log-ratio-an-informal-introduction/ Chang, P. (2012). Using a stance corpus to learn about effective authorial stance-taking: A textlinguistic approach. ReCALL, 24(2), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000079
Charles, M. (2015). Genre, corpus and discourse: Enriching EAP pedagogy. In P. Thompson & G. Diani (Eds.), English for academic purposes: Approaches and implications (pp. 265–284). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Christiansen, M. H., & Arnon, I. (2017). More than words: The role of multiword sequences in language learning and use. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(2), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12274
Conrad, S. M., & Biber, D. (2005). Frequency and use of lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. Lexicographica, 20, 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484604674.56
Cook, V. (2021). The language in language and thinking. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18, 35–58. https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i18
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001
Cortes, V. (2006). Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and Education, 17(4), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.02.001
Cortes, V. (2023). Lexical bundles and phrase frames. In M. Kessler & C. Polio (Eds.),
Conducting genre-based research in applied linguistics (pp. 105–125). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003300847
Davis, M., & Morley, J. (2015). Phrasal intertextuality: The responses of academics from different disciplines to students’ re-use of phrases. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.004
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2013a). Grammar and discourse. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.),
The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 2324–2331). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0464
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2013b). Lexical bundles indicating authorial presence: A cross-cultural analysis of novice Czech and German writers’ academic discourse.Discourse and Interaction, 6(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2013-1-7
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2023). Self-mention in L2 (Czech) learner academic discourse: Realisations, functions and distribution across master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101272
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in linguistics 1934–1951.
Flowerdew, J. (2016). English for specific academic purposes (ESAP) writing. Writing Pedagogy, 8(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v8i1.30051
Goulard, L., Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2022). In this essay, I will...: Examining variation of communicative purpose in student written genres. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 59(3), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101159
Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2015). Phraseology. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 125–145). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764377
Hewings, M., & Hewings, A. (2002). “It is interesting to note that...”: A comparative study of anticipatory ‘it’ in student and published writing. English for Specific Purposes, 21(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00016-3
Hyland, K. (2002a). Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.2.215
Hyland, K. (2002b). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00028-X
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press ELT. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6719
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2008a). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate
writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.x
Hyland, K. (2008b). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English
for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESP.2007.06.001
Hyland, K. (2008c). Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching,
41(4), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005235
Hyland, K. (2012). Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000037
Hyland, K. (2023). Changing times; changing texts. In P. M. Rogers, D. R. Russell, P. Carlino & J. M. Marine (Eds.), Writing as a human activity: Implications and applications of the work of Charles Bazerman (Vol. 1, pp. 47–66). WAC Clearinghouse. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2023.1800.2.3
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Academic lexical bundles: How are they changing? International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(4), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17080.hyl
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2009). Academic lexis and disciplinary practice: Corpus evidence for specificity. International Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.9.2.90781
Isbilen, E. S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Chunk-based memory constraints on the
cultural evolution of language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(2), 713–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12376
Jančaříková, R. (2023). Attitude markers in L2 learners’ academic writing: A case study of master’s theses by Czech students compared to L1 students’ writings. Brno Studies in English, 1, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.5817/bse2023-1-1
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, P. (2014). The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1(1), 7–36.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2024, May 10). Support website for Corpus Linguistics: Method, theory and practice. http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/clmtp
Paquot, M. (2010). Academic vocabulary in learner writing: From extraction to analysis.
Continuum.
Rayson, P. (2024, May 4). Testing for significance: Log likelihood. https://www.lancaster.
ac.uk/fss/courses/ling/corpus/blue/l08_4.htm
Rayson, P., & Garside, R. (2000). Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora, Held in Conjunction With the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2000). 1–8 October 2000, Hong Kong (pp. 1–6).
Samraj, B. (2024). Disciplinary differences in lexical bundles use: A cautionary tale from methodological variations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 70, Article 101399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101399
Simpson-Vlach, R. C., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058
Walková, M., & Bradford, J. (2022). Constructing an argument in academic writing across disciplines. ESP Today, 10(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.1.2
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772
Wray, A., & Perkins, M. R. (2000). The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication, 20(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2025 Hana Atcheson