Hate speech as a conflict communication tool: The case of Donald Trump

Vol.19,No.1(2026)
Discourse and Interaction

Abstract

Hate speech is a crucial tool in Trump’s conflict communication, which helped him win the 2024 presidential election. This study aims to investigate hate speech in Trump’s political discourse, focusing on the role and functions of hate speech as a conflict communication tool. The research demonstrates that hate rhetoric in Trump’s political discourse aimed at positioning himself as the best choice and, simultaneously, forming an extremely negative image of his political opponents. The expression of Trump’s hate speech encompasses negative stereotypical and non-typical nominations within the threat domain which are targeted at three main addressees: the presidential candidate Kamala Harris, then President Joe Biden and the Democratic Party.


Keywords:
conflict communication; hate speech; nominations; political discourse; political rhetoric
Author biography

Vilma Linkevičiūtė

Kaunas University of Technology

Vilma Linkevičiūtė is an associate professor at Kaunas University of Technology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, Lithuania. She specializes in political discourse and cognitive linguistics and is currently working on the topics of hate speech, image formation in political discourse, political linguistics, and war and refugee discourse.
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6982-2892

Address: Vilma Linkevičiūtė, Faculty of Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, Kaunas University of Technology, Mickevičiaus 37, Kaunas, Lithuania. [e-mail:vilma.linkeviciute@ktu.lt]

References

Agarwal, P., Hawkins, O., Amaxopoulou, M., Dempsey, N., Sastry, N., & Wood, E. (2021). Hate speech in political discourse: A case study of UK MPs on Twitter. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT ’21), 5–16. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3465336.3475113
Akbar, M., & Safdar, A. (2024). Exploring ethnic discrimination and hate speech in online political discourses: A comprehensive analysis from the Pakistani context. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(1), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-I)25
Alcántara-Plá, M. (2024). Understanding emotions in hate speech: A methodology for discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 35(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265231222013
Balsiūnaitė, I. (2016). Neapykantos kalbos raiška Lietuvos interneto dienraščių publikacijose apie pabėgėlius [Expression of hate speech in Lithuanian online news publications]. Žurnalistikos tyrimai, 11, 81–85. https://doi.org/10.15388/ZT/JR.2016.11.10751
Berdón Prieto, P., Martín Jiménez, V., Herrero Izquierdo, J., & Reguero Sanz, I. (2023). Hate speech on Twitter: Vox in the Catalan parliamentary elections. Journalism Practice, 18(2), 374–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2282082
Bolinger, D. (1973). Truth is a linguistic question. Language, 49(3), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/412350
Brown, A. (2008). The racial and religious hatred act 2006: A Millian response. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230701880471
Brown, A. (2017). What is hate speech? Part 1: The myth of hate. Law and Philosophy, 36(4), 419–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-017-9297-1
Dawidczyk, A., & Jurczak, J. (2023). Hate speech in political discourse in 2015–2021 as a determinant of Poland’s internal and external security. Democracy and Security, 20(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2023.2229262
Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2004). Understanding words that wound. Westview Press.
De Oliveira, A. B., Baptista, C. S., Firmino, A. A., & De Paiva, A. C. (2024). A large language model approach to detect hate speech in political discourse using multiple language corpora. Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC ‘24), 1461–1468. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3635964
Ermida, I. (2023). Distinguishing online hate speech from aggressive speech: A five factor annotation model. In I. Ermida (Ed.), Hate speech in social media: Linguistic approaches (pp. 35–75). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-03138248-2_2
Howard, J. (2019). Free speech and hate speech. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051517-012343
Jafri, F. A., Rauniyar, K., Thapa, S., Siddiqui, M. A., Khushi, M., & Naseem, U. (2024).
CHUNAV: Analyzing Hindi hate speech and targeted groups in Indian election discourse. ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing. https://doi.org/10.1145/3665245
Jorgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2008). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.
Leung, S. (2002). Conflict talk: A discourse analytical perspective. Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.7916/salt.v2i3.1643
Linkevičiūtė, V. (2011). Conflict communication discourse of political leaders of Lithuania and Great Britain (1998–2008): Rhetorical-cognitive peculiarities [Doctoral dissertation, Vilnius University].
Linkevičiūtė, V. (2013). Oppositions and their member nominations in the conflict communication discourse of Rolandas Paksas (2003–2004). Respectus Philologicus, 23(28), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.15388/RESPECTUS.2013.23.28.10
Linkevičiūtė, V. (2019). Conceptual metaphors in Donald Trump’s political discourse: Politics domain (2018). Kalbų studijos, 34, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.34.21886
Linkevičiūtė, V. (2021). Joe Biden’s conflict communication discourse with Vladimir Putin: Geneva case (2021). Eastern Journal of European Studies, 12(2), 244–262. Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Press. https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2021-0212
Littlejohn, S. W. (1999). Theories of human communication. Wadsworth.
Matsuda, M. J. (1989). Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim’s story. Michigan Law Review, 87(8), 2320–2381. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289306
Piazza, J. A. (2020). Politician hate speech and domestic terrorism. International Interactions, 46(3), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2020.1739033
Portmann, L. (2022). Do stereotypes explain discrimination against minority candidates or discrimination in favor of majority candidates? British Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000800
Rabab’ah, G., Hussein, A., & Jarbou, S. (2024). Hate speech in political discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 37, 2237–2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10158-8
Sillars, A. L. (1982). Manual for coding interpersonal conflict. University of Montana.
Sponholz, L. (2018). Hate speech in den Massenmedien: Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Umsetzung [Hate speech in the mass media: Theoretical foundations and empirical realisation]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15077-8
Sponholz, L. (2023). Hate speech. In C. Strippel, S. Paasch-Colberg, M. Emmer, & J. Trebbe (Eds.), Challenges and perspectives of hate speech research (pp. 143–163). https://doi.org/10.48541/dcr.v12.9
Stone, G. (1994). Hate speech and the U.S. Constitution. East European Constitutional Review, 3, 78–82.
United Nations. (n.d.). Understanding hate speech. https://www.un.org/en/hate-speech/understanding-hate-speech/what-is-hate-speech
van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Ideological discourse analysis. In C. Schaffner & A. Wenden
(Eds.), Language and peace (pp. 17–33). Dartmouth Publishing.
Weissenbacher, M., & Kruschwitz, U. (2024). Analyzing offensive language and hate speech in political discourse: A case study of German politicians. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Threat, Aggression & Cyberbullying @ LREC-COLING-2024, 60–72. ELRA and ICCL.

Sources
ABC News. (2024, September 10). Harris-Trump presidential debate transcript. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-trump-presidential-debate-transcript/story?id=113560542
Civiqs/Daily Kos. (2024, March 19–24). National politics survey. https://civiqs.com/documents/Civiqs_DailyKos_monthly_banner_book_2024_03_8zn7pf.pdf
Echelon Insights. (2024, April 12–14). Echelon Insights poll. https://echelonin.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/April-2024-Omnibus-ToplineEXTERNAL.pdf
The Economist/YouGov. (2024, March 3–5). The Economist/YouGov poll. https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/econTabReport_nmFBeqb.pdf
Novus/Gallup International. (2024, October). Harris vs Trump survey. https://novus.se/en/egnaundersokningar-arkiv/2024-10-novus-gallup-international/
Pew Research Center. (2024, May 8). Views of Ukraine and U.S. involvement with the Russia-Ukraine war. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2024/05/08/views-of-ukraine-and-u-s-involvement-with-the-russia-ukraine-war/
Times/Siena. (2024, March 2). Cross-tabs: February 2024 Times/Siena poll of registered voters nationwide. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/03/05/us/elections/times-siena-poll-registered-voter-crosstabs.html
Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation/YouGov. (2020, October). The report on U.S. attitudes toward socialism, communism, and collectivism. https://victimsofcommunism.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/10.19.20-VOC-YouGovSurvey-on-U.S.-Attitudes-Toward-Socialism-Communism-and-Collectivism.pdf
YouGov. (2024, November 1). Who do Europeans want to win the 2024 US presidential election? https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/50844-who-do-europeans-want-to-win-the-2024-us-presidential-election

Metrics

0

Crossref logo

0


0

Views

0

pdf views