First language and second language English editorialists’ use of interactional metadiscourse

Vol.16,No.2(2023)
Discourse and Interaction

Abstract

This study explores the use of interactional1 metadiscourse by first language (L1) and second language (L2) English editorialists. The study uses Hyland’s (2019) model of metadiscourse to analyse 80 editorials published between 2020 and 2021 in The Guardian and The Jordan Times newspapers (40 from each newspaper). A mixed-method approach  – adopting quantitative and qualitative measures – was used to analyse the data. The frequency of interactional metadiscourse resources was statistically examined to find similarities and differences (if any) between the two corpora. The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the use of interactional metadiscourse resources in the editorials of the two newspapers. For instance, L2 editorialists used fewer hedges in their editorials and more boosters than L1 editorialists. In addition, engagement markers were used the most by L1 editorialists. The study provides some implications for editorialists who write in English and recommendations for future research.


Keywords:
politeness, refusal, social distance, social status, marriage proposals
Author biographies

Sharif Alghazo

University of Jordan

Sharif Alghazo is Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics at the University of Sharjah and the University of Jordan. His research has appeared in journals such as System, Journal of Politeness Research, Journal of Pragmatics, European Journal of Applied Linguistics, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Sage
Open, Ampersand, and Topics in Linguistics, and edited books.

Khulood Al-Anbar

The University of Jordan

Khulood Al-Anbar is Adjunct Lecturer of Linguistics at the University of Jordan. Her research has appeared in journals such as Topics in Linguistics and Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.

Abdel Rahman Altakhaineh

Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh is Assistant Professor of English Language and Linguistics at the University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. His research interests lie in the areas of morphology, lexical semantics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics and technology in language learning. He has published research papers in Lingua, Languages, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Studia Linguistica, Language and Cognition, Canadian Journal of Linguistics, Applied Linguistics Review and others.

Marwan Jarrah

The University of Jordan

Marwan Jarrah is Associate Professor at the University of Jordan. He is a specialist in language typology and syntactic theory. His scholarly work appears in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, Folia Linguistica, Studia
Linguistica, Lingua, Word, Journal of Linguistics, Canadian Journal of Linguistics, and The Linguistic Review.

References

Abdi, R. (2002) ‘Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity.’ Discourse Studies 4(2), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040020101
Abusalim, N., Zidouni, S., Alghazo, S., Rabab’ah, G. and Rayyan, M. (2022) ‘Textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in political discourse: A case study.’ Cogent Arts & Humanities 9(1), Article 2124683. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.21
24683
Ädel, A. (2006) Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ädel, A. (2008) ‘Metadiscourse across three varieties of English: American, British and advanced learner English.’ In: Connor, U., Nagelhout, E. and Rozycki, W. V. (eds) Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 45-62.
Alghazo, S. M., Al-Anbar, K., Altakhaineh, A. and Jarrah, M. (2023) ‘Interactive metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English: Evidence from editorials.’ Topics in Linguistics 24(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2023-0004
Alghazo, S., Al Salem, M. N. and Alrashdan, I. (2021a) ‘Stance and engagement in English and Arabic research article abstracts.’ System 103, 102681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102681
Alghazo, S., Al Salem, M. N., Alrashdan, I. and Rabab’ah, G. (2021b) ‘Grammatical devices of stance in written academic English.’ Heliyon 7(11), e08463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08463
Ansary, H. and Babaii, E. (2009) ‘A cross-cultural analysis of English newspaper editorials: A systemic-functional view of text for contrastive rhetoric research.’ RELC Journal 40(2), 211-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688209105867
Beauvais, P. (1989) ‘A speech-act theory of metadiscourse’. Written Communication 6(1), 11-30.
Benson, P., Barkhuizen, G., Bodycott, P. and Brown, J. (2013) ‘Second language identity.’ In: Benson, P., Barkhuizen, G., Bodycott, P. and Brown, J. (eds) Second Language Identity in Narratives of Study Abroad. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.
org/10.1057/9781137029423_2Biber, D. and Conrad, S. (2001) ‘Register variation: A corpus approach.’ In: Schiffrin,
D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H. E. (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing. 175-196.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Camiciottoli, B. C. (2003) ‘Metadiscourse and ESP reading comprehension: An exploratory study.’ Reading in a Foreign Language 15(1), 28-44.
Charteris-Black, J. (2011) Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Connor, U. (2018) ‘Intercultural rhetoric.’ In: Liontas, J. I. (ed.) The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0528
Crismore, A. (1983) Metadiscourse: What is it and How is it Used in School and Nonschool Social Science Texts. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2003) ‘Metadiscourse revisited: A contrastive study of persuasive writing in professional discourse.’ Estudios Ingleses De La Universidad Complutense 11, 29-52.
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008) ‘The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse.’ Journal of Pragmatics 40(1), 95-113.
Dahl, T. (2004) ‘Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline?’ Journal of Pragmatics 36(10), 1807-1825.
Fu, X. and Hyland, K. (2014) ‘Interaction in two journalistic genres: A study of interactional metadiscourse.’ English Text Construction 7(1), 122-144.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. (2013) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
Halmari, H. and Virtanen, T. (eds) (2005) Persuasion Across Genres: A Linguistic Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Homayounzadeh, M. and Mehrpour, S. (2013) ‘A contrastive analysis of the American and Persian newspaper editorials.’ Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 17(2), 1-22.
Hyland, K. (1998) ‘Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse.’ Journal of Pragmatics 30(4), 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5
Hyland, K. (1999) ‘Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory coursebooks.’ English for Specific Purposes 18(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00025-2
Hyland, K. (2004) ‘Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing.’ Journal of Second Language Writing 13(2), 133-151.
Hyland, K. (2005a) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Bloomsbury.
Hyland, K. (2005b) ‘Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.’ Discourse Studies 7(2), 173-192.
Hyland, K. (2007) ‘Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse.’ Applied Linguistics 28(2), 266-285. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm011
Hyland, K. (2017) ‘Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?’ Journal of Pragmatics 113, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007 Hyland, K. (2019) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. 2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury.
Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2004) ‘Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal.’ Applied Linguistics 25(2), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
Jalilifar, A. and Alipour, M. (2007) ‘How explicit instruction makes a difference: Metadiscourse markers and EFL learners’ reading comprehension skill.’ Journal of College Reading and Learning 38(1), 35-52.
Kaplan, R. B. (1966) ‘Cultural thought patterns in inter‐cultural education.’ Language Learning 16(1‐2), 1-20.
Le, E. (2004) ‘Active participation within written argumentation: Metadiscourse and editorialist’s authority.’ Journal of Pragmatics 36(4), 687-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00032-8
Lee, J. J. and Casal, J. E. (2014) ‘Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering.’ System 46, 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.009
Lee, J. J. and Deakin, L. (2016) ‘Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student
writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays.’ Journal of Second Language Writing 33, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004
Lee, N. I. (2011) ‘Academic and journalistic writing in English and Japanese: A contrastive study on stance and engagement expressions.’ Journal of Modern Languages 21(1), 59-71.
Lee, S. (2019) ‘Interactional metadiscourse in editorials: A cross-cultural analysis.’ The Journal of Linguistic Science 91, 183-202.
Lemke, J. L. (1990) Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values. Norwood: Ablex.
Liao, J. (2020) ‘Metadiscourse, cohesion, and engagement in L2 written discourse.’ Languages 5(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5020025
Liu, S. and Zhang, J. (2021) ‘Using metadiscourse to enhance persuasiveness in corporate press releases: A corpus-based study.’ SAGE Open 11(3), 21582440211032165. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032165
Nguyen Thi Thuy, T. (2018) ‘A corpus-based study on cross-cultural divergence in the use of hedges in academic research articles written by Vietnamese and native Englishspeaking authors.’ Social Sciences 7(4), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7040070
Noorian, M. and Biria, R. (2010) ‘Interpersonal metadiscourse in persuasive journalism: A study of texts by American and Iranian EFL columnists.’ Journal of Modern Languages 20(1), 64-79.
Norton, B. and McKinney, C. (2011) ‘An identity approach to second language acquisition.’ In: Atkinson, D. (ed.) Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Oxon: Routledge. 85-106.
O’Keeffe, A. (2006) Investigating Media Discourse. London: Routledge.
Pérez-Llantada, C. (2010) ‘The discourse functions of metadiscourse in published academic writing: Issues of culture and language.’ Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2), 41-68.
Salahshoor, F. and Tofigh, M. (2014) ‘Interpersonal metadiscourse in newspaper editorials.’ The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances 2(1), 91-109.
Sclafani, J. (2017) Talking Donald Trump: A Sociolinguistic Study of Style, Metadiscourse, and Political Identity. London: Routledge.Siddique, A. R., Mahmood, M. A. and Iqbal, J. (2018) ‘Metadiscourse analysis of Pakistani English newspaper editorials: A corpus-based study.’ International Journal of English Linguistics 8(1), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n1p146
Sinclair, J. (1981) ‘Planes of discourse’. In: Rizvi, S. (ed.) The Two-fold Voice: Essays in Honour of Ramesh Mohan. Salzburg: Salzburg University Press, 70-89.
Tarrayo, V. N. and Duque, M. C. T. (2011) ‘Arguing in L2: Discourse structure and textual metadiscourse in Philippine newspaper editorials.’ Journal of English Language Teaching 1(4), 11-24.
Tavakoli, M., Dabaghi, A. and Khorvash, Z. (2010) ‘The effect of metadiscourse awareness on L2 reading comprehension: A case of Iranian EFL learners.’ English Language Teaching 3(1), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n1p92
Thompson, G. (2001) ‘Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader.’ Applied Linguistics 22(1), 58-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58
Van Dijk, T. A. (1988) News as Discourse. New Jersey: University of Groningen.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Opinions and ideologies in editorials [Paper presentation]. 4th International Symposium of Critical Discourse Analysis, Language, Social Life and Critical Thought. Greece: Athens, 14th-16th December. http://www.discursos.org/
unpublished%20articles/Opinions%20and%20ideologies%20in%20editorials.htm
Vande Kopple, W. J. (2012) ‘The importance of studying metadiscourse.’ Applied Research on English Language 1(2), 37-44.
Wu, B. and Paltridge, B. (2021) ‘Stance expressions in academic writing: A corpus-based comparison of Chinese students’ MA dissertations and PhD theses.’ Lingua 253, 103071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103071
Yoon, H. J. (2021) ‘Interactions in EFL argumentative writing: Effects of topic, L1 background, and L2 proficiency on interactional metadiscourse.’ Reading and Writing 34(3), 705-725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10085-7
Zarrati, Z., Nambiar, R. M. and Maasum, T. N. R. T. M. (2014) ‘Effect of metadiscourse on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners.’ 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature 20(3), 27-38.
Zhao, J. (2017) ‘Native speaker advantage in academic writing? Conjunctive realizations in EAP writing by four groups of writers.’ Ampersand 4, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2017.07.001

Metrics

0

Crossref logo

0


137

Views

81

PDF views