RECURRENT LEXIS AND PHRASEOLOGY IN ENGLISH RESTAURANT REVIEWS: A DATA-DRIVEN ANALYSIS

Vol.14,No.2(2021)

Abstract

This paper presents a corpus linguistic analysis of recurrent vocabulary and phraseology
in written English food discourse. More specifi cally, it focuses on the use and discourse functions of keywords, key multi-word terms and lexical bundles in a specialized corpus comprising 200 professional restaurant reviews that were published in online editions of selected British and American newspapers. The results of the study indicate that the most distinctive lexical feature of the analyzed texts is the frequent mention of ingredients and the limited presence of stance devices. The most frequently mentioned aspects of the referential content also show that what is evaluated is the total experience of eating and dining at a restaurant. These fi ndings contribute to the area of English for
Specific Purposes, off ering pedagogical potential that can be exploited when developing purpose-made teaching materials for students in food-related programs who need to learn the specialized vocabulary of their target profession.


Keywords:
food discourse; restaurant reviews; corpus linguistics; keywords; multi-word terms; lexical bundles
Author biography

Tatiana Szczygłowska

Tatiana Szczygłowska, Institute of Neophilology, University of Bielsko-Biala, ul. Willowa 2, 43-309 Bielsko-Biała, Poland.

Institute of Neophilology, University of Bielsko-Biala, Poland

References

Barrows, C. W., Lattuca, F. P. and Bosselman, R. (1989) ‘Influence of restaurant reviews upon customers.’ Hospitality Review 7(2), 84-92.

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.

Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Cortes, V. (2004) ‘If you look at...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks.’ Applied Linguistics 25(3), 371-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371

Biber, D. and Barbieri, F. (2007) ‘Lexical bundles in university spoken and written
registers.’ English for Specifi c Purposes 26, 263-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003

Blank, G. (2007) Critics, Ratings, and Society: The Sociology of Reviews. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefi eld.

Cesiri, D. (2019) ‘Philosophical tenets in the construction of culinary discourse: The case of British celebrity chefs’ websites.’ Poetics 74, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.04.005

Combs, M. (2018) Food Discourse: The Communicative Gateway Toward Understanding Formerly Colonized Representation in Parts Unknown. Theses and Dissertations. 850. Online document. Retrieved on 10 May 2020 <https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1850&context=etd>.

Cortes, V. (2004) ‘Lexical bundles in student and published academic writing: Examples from history and biology.’ English for Specifi c Purposes 23(4), 397-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001

Crystal, D. (1996) The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.

Danowska-Tomczyk, A. (2018) ‘Dziennikarstwo kulinarne a internetowe recenzje –
wyzwanie czy zagrożenie?’ Acta Universitatis Lodziensis 5(51), 53-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1505-9057.51.05

Davis, M. (2009) A Taste for New York: Restaurant Reviews, Food Discourse, and the
Field of Gastronomy in America. Doctoral Thesis. New York University. Online document. Retrieved on 5 June 2020 <https://www.wine-economics.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/AAWE_WP106.pdf>.

Ferguson, P. P. (2014) Word of Mouth: What We Talk About When We Talk About Food.
California: University of California Press.

Flowerdew, L. (2004) ‘The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional settings.’ In: Connor, U. and Upton, T. (eds) Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 11-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.02flo

Gerhardt, C. (2013) ‘Food and language – language and food.’ In Gerhardt, C., Frobenius, M. and Ley, S. (eds) Culinary Linguistics: The Chef’s Special. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 3-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/clu.10.01ger

Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2011) Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English: A Corpus-Based Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-00659-9

Hou, H. (2012) ‘A corpus approach to discourse analysis of newspaper restaurant reviews: A preliminary analysis.’ Studies in Literature and Language 5(3), 95-100.

Jacob, D. (2015) Will Write For Food. 3 rd ed. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press.

Kilgarriff , A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P. andSuchomel, V. (2014) ‘The Sketch Engine: Ten years on.’ Lexicography, Journal of Asialex 1(1), 7-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9

Kobez, M. (2018) ‘Restaurant reviews aren’t what they used to be’: Digital disruption
and the transformation of the role of the food critic.’ Communication Research and Practice 4(3), 261-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1476797

Mallory, H. (2015) ‘Restaurant reviews.’ In: Albala, K. (ed.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of
Food Issues. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. 1210-1214.

Matwick, K. and Matwick, K. (2018) ‘Restaurant reviews and college writing: A framework for teaching.’ Teaching Journalism and Mass Communication 8(2), 25-37.

Matwick, K. and Matwick, K. (2019) Food Discourse of Celebrity Chefs of Food Network. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31430-9

Mennell, S. (1996) All Manners of Food: Eating and Taste in England and France from the Middle Ages to the Present. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Mützel, S. (2015) ‘Structures of the tasted: Restaurant reviews in Berlin between 1995 and 2012.’ In: Berthoin Antal, A., Hutter, M. and Stark, D. (eds) Moments of Valuation: Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 147-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702504.003.0008

National Restaurant Association (2020) 2020 State of the Restaurant Industry Report.

O’Keeff e, A., McCarthy, M. J. and Carter, R. A. (2007) From Corpus to Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497650

Parikh, A. A., Behnke, C., Almanza, B., Nelson, D. and Vorvoreanu, M. (2017) ‘Comparative content analysis of professional, semi-professional, and user-generated
restaurant reviews.’ Journal of Foodservice Business Research 20(5), 497-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2016.1219170

Riley K. C. and Cavanaugh J. R. (2017) ‘Tasty talk, expressive food: An introduction to
the semiotics of food-and-language.’ Semiotic Review 5. Online document. 20 May 2020 <https://www.semioticreview.com/ojs/index.php/sr/article/view/1/71>.

Scott, M. (1996) Wordsmith Tools 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Scott, M. (2012) WordSmith Tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.

Scott, M. and Tribble, C. (2006) Textual Patterns. Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22

Sietsema, R. (2010) ‘Everyone eats... But that doesn’t make you a restaurant critic.’
Columbia Journalism Review 48(5). Online document. 15 May 2020 <https://archives.cjr.org/feature/everyone_eats.php>.

Spang, R. (2000) The Invention of the Restaurant: Paris and Modern Gastronomic Culture. 3 rd ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Titz, K., Lanza-Abbott, J’-A. and Cordúa y Cruz, G. (2004) ‘The anatomy of restaurant
reviews: An exploratory study.’ International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration 5(1), 49-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J149v05n01_03

Vincent, A. M. (2019) Sydney Eats, Melbourne Dines: Shaping Australian Tastes 1970-1995. Doctoral Thesis. Central Queensland University. Online document.
Retrieved on 19 June 2020 <http://dx.doi.org/10.25946/5d26ba8fd01c1>.

Williamson, D., Tregidga, H., Harris, C. and Keen, C. (2009) ‘The working engines of distinction: Discourse for main course in restaurant reviews.’ Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 16, 55-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1375/jhtm.16.1.55

Metrics

223

Views

272

PDF views