HYBRID DISCOURSE AND THE EMERGENCE OF CONTEXT IN BBC’S QUESTION TIME
Vol.14,No.2(2021)
This paper explores how hybrid discourse, instantiated in talk and interaction, can be shaped not only by a situational context (TV panel show) and cultural context (TV’s increasing democratisation of laity), but also by human volition in pursuit of recognizable and allowable goals. It does this by examining the emergence of context in light of a non-mainstream hybrid and refl exive activity. Specifically, it examines a non-normative interview format that has arisen in contemporary broadcasting through the analysis of three transcribed segments which were taken from two key episodes of the BBC’s fl agship political program: Question Time. Using a range of analytical concepts from symbolic interactionism, pragmatics, and conversational analysis, such as frames and footings, activity types, discourse types, and turn-taking, the analysis shows how institutional (political) and non-institutional (normative) practices can come together in the pursuit of individual goals and contemporary media’s goal for increasingly partisan journalism and confrontainment. Overall, the paper highlights the importance of a multidimensional approach to context, whereby meaning both emerges from and is constitutive of the forms and functions of an activity’s discourse, whilst further highlighting the role of hybridity in contemporary discourse.
activity types; confrontainment; context; hybrid political discourse; reflexivity
Neil Evan Jon Anthony Bowen
Department of English and Linguistics, Thammasat University, Klongluang, Pathumthani, Bangkok, Thailand
Adams, T. (2009) ‘It wasn’t a bullfi ght... it was a good moment for the BBC.’ The
Guardian. Retrieved from <https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/dec/20/faces-
2009-david-dimbleby-question-time>.
Atkinson, P. (1988) ‘Ethnomethodology: A critical review.’ Annual Review of Sociology 14, 441-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.002301
Allan, K. (2016) ‘The pragmeme of insult and some allopracts.’ In: Allan, K., Capone, A. and Kecskes, I. (eds) Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Dordrecht: Springer. 69-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_4
Auer, P. (2009) ‘Context and contextualization.’ In: Verschueren, J. and Östman, J. O.
(eds) Key Notions for Pragmatics (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 86-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.1.05aue
Auer, P. and Di Luzio, A. (1992) The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22
Blum-Kulka, S. (2005) ‘Rethinking genre: Discursive events as a social interactional
phenomenon.’ In: Fitch, K. L. and Sanders, R. E. (eds) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 275-300.
Bull, P. (2003) Microanalysis of Political Communication: Claptrap and Ambiguity (Vol. 7). London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417843
Capone, A. (2018) ‘Pragmemes (again).’ Lingua 209, 89-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.04.004
Chadwick, A. (2013) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001
Clayman, S. and Heritage, J. (2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623
Cottle, S. (2002) ‘Television agora and agoraphobia post-September 11.’ In: Zelizer, B. and Allan, S. (eds) Journalism after September 11. London: Routledge. 178-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203218136_chapter_10
Coupland, N. and Coupland, J. (2000) ‘Relational frames and pronominal address/
reference: The discourse of geriatric medical triads.’ In: Sarangi, S. and Coulthard, M.
(eds) Discourse and Social Life. London: Longman. 207-229.
Culpeper, J., Crawshaw, R. and Harrison, J. (2008) ‘‘Activity types’ and ‘discourse types’: Mediating ‘advice’ in interactions between foreign language assistants and their
supervisors in schools in France and England.’ Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 27(4), 297-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2008.015
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fillmore, C., Kay, P. and O’Connor, M. C. (1988) ‘Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions.’ Language 64, 501-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/414531
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, C. and Duranti, A. (1992) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenonenom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975) ‘Logic and conversation.’ In: Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 41-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
Gumperz, J. J. (1982) Discourse Strategies (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834
Heritage, J. (2009) ‘Conversation analysis as social theory.’ In: Turner, B. S. (ed.) The
New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 300-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304992.ch15
Holmes, S. and Jermyn, D. (2004) Understanding Reality Television. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203601280
Hutchby, I. (2006) Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting. Maidenhead: Open University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916657528
Hutchby, I. (2017) ‘Hybridisation, personalisation and tribuneship in the political interview.’ Journalism 18(1), 101-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916657528
Hymes, D. (1972) ‘Models of interaction in language and social life.’ In: Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. London: Basil Blackwell. 35-71.
Jefferson, G. (2004) ‘Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.’ In: Lerner,
G. (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins. 12-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
Levinson, S. C. (1992) ‘Activity types and language.’ In: Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 66-100.
Martinson, J. (2019) ‘Question Time: The BBC should admit its mistake and move on.’
The Guardian. Retrieved from <https://www.theguardian.com/media/commentisfree
/2019/jan/27/question-time-bbc-diane-abbott>.
McKeown, J. and Ladegaard, H. J. (2020) ‘Exploring the metadiscursive realisation of
incivility in TV news discourse.’ Discourse, Context & Media 33, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916657528
Mey, J. L. (2001) Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2 nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Parvaresh, V. and Capone, A. (eds) (2017) The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death (Vol. 13). Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55759-5
Penlington, G. (2009) ‘Question Time: Sitting uncomfortably? Then we’ll begin.’ The
Telegraph. Retrieved from <https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/5990426/
Question-Time-Sitting-uncomfortably-Then-well-begin.html>.
Rivers, D. J. and Ross, A. S. (2018) ‘An integrated approach to non-verbal performance in the Hybrid Political Interview.’ Journal of Pragmatics 132, 59-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.012
Sacks, H., Schegloff , E. A. and Jeff erson, G. (1974) ‘A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.’ Language 50(4), 696-735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
Sarangi, S. (2000) ‘Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: The case of genetic counselling.’ In: Sarangi, S. and Coulthard, M. (eds) Discourse and Social Life. London: Pearson Education Limited. 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838502-1
Schegloff , E. A. (2007) ‘A tutorial on membership categorization.’ Journal of Pragmatics 39(3), 462-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
Thomas, J. (1995) Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London:
Longman.
Thompson, J. B. (1995) The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media.
Stanford, CA: Standord University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2021 Neil Evan Jon Anthony Bowen