SENTIMENT(ALITY) AS A MEANS OF PERSUASION: ON THE THIN ICE OF MANIPULATION IN PROTESTANT SERMONS
Vol.14,No.2(2021)
Religious discourse represents an area of human communication in which persuasion plays a vital role; religious texts seem to be essentially related to the ultimate objective of religion: to create, mediate and legitimise ideology in order to persuade the reader of the veracity of the religious doctrine (Fairclough 1989, Cotterell & Turner 1989: 26-33, van Dijk 1998: 317). The paper seeks to investigate the persuasive strategies and linguistic means employed to convey persuasion in English Protestant sermons. The analysis focuses on the rhetorical role of pathos, which is purposefully evoked by the preacher via wilful employment of aff ect and emotions. Attention will also be paid to the blurred borderline between the intentional use of sentiment and sentimentality, and manipulation.
persuasion; sermons; pathos; sentiment; sentimentality; manipulation
Martin Adam
Department of English Language and Literature, Masaryk University, Poříčí 9, Brno 603 00
Associate Professor at the Department of English Language and
Literature, Masaryk University, Brno
Adam, M. (2017) ‘Persuasion in religious discourse: Enhancing credibility in sermon titles and openings.’ Discourse and Interaction 10(2), 5-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2017-2-5
Adam, M. (2019) ‘Enhancing persuasion in sermon conclusions through fear induction.’ In: Crhová, M. and Weiss, M. (eds) Silesian Studies in English 2018. Proceedings of the 5 th International Conference of English and American studies. Opava: Silesian University in Opava. 7-23.
Adam M. (2020) ‘Persuasion in religious discourse: Employing humour to enhance persuasive eff ect in sermons.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., Adam, M., Povolná, R. and Vogel, R. Persuasion in Specialised Discourses. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 197-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58163-3_5
Begbie, J. S. (2007) ‘Beauty, sentimentality and the arts.’ In: Treier, D., Husbands, M. and Lundin, R. (eds) The Beauty of God: Theology and the Arts. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. 45-69.
Bhatia, V. (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
Connor, U. (2004) ‘Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts.’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3(4), 291-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003
Cotterell, P. and Turner, M. (1989) Linguistics and Biblical Interpretation. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Dillard, J. P. and Peck, E. (2001) ‘Persuasion and the structure of aff ect: Dual systems and discrete emotions as complementary models.’ Human Communication Research 27(1), 38-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/27.1.38
Dillard, J. P. and Pfau, M. (eds) (2002) The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dillard, J. P. and Anderson, J. W. (2004) ‘The role of fear in persuasion.’ Psychology and Marketing 21(11), 909-926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20041
Dillard, J. P. and Seo, K. (2013) ‘Aff ect and persuasion.’ In: Dillard, J. P. and Shen, L.
(eds) The Sage Book of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice. London: Sage. 150-166.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., Adam, M., Povolná, R. and Vogel, R. (2020) ‘Persuasive strategies across the academic, business, religious and technical discourses.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O., Adam, M., Povolná, R. and Vogel, R. Persuasion in Specialised Discourses. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58163-3
Duffy, M. and Thorson, E. (2016) Persuasion Ethics Today. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315651309
Dvořák, M. (2012) ‘Fear induction, versatile wide-coverage taints, semantic polarity and semantic association as means of persuasion in religious discourse.’ In: International Symposium on Language and Communication: Research Trends and Challenges: Proceedings Book. Izmir: Institute of Language and Communication Studies. 497-509.
Dvořák, M. (2013) ‘Means of increasing credibility in religious discourse.’ Language and Communication Quarterly 2(4), 230-241.
Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
Garzone, G. E. (2017) ‘Persuasive strategies on surrogacy websites: A discourse-analytical and rhetorical study.’ In: Orts Llopis, M. Á., Breeze, R. and Gotti, M. (eds) Power, Persuasion and Manipulation in Specialised Genres. Providing Keys to the Rhetoric of Professional Communities. Bern: Peter Lang. 101-130.
Gatti L., Guerini, M., Stock, O. and Strapparava, C. (2014) ‘Sentiment variations in text for persuasion technology.’ In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L. and Gamberini, L. (eds) Persuasive Technology, Vol. 8462. Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_10
Halmari, H. and Virtanen, T. (eds) (2005) Persuasion across Genres. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.130
Hogan, M. (2013) ‘Persuasion in the rhetorical tradition.’ In: Dillard, J. P. and Shen, L. (eds) The Sage Book of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publications. 2-19.
Holtgraves, T. M. (2001) Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language
Use. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hunston, S. (2007) ‘Using corpus to investigate stance quantitatively and qualitatively.’ In: Englebretson, R. (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 27-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.03hun
Kortum, R. D. (2013) Varieties of Tone. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263544
Lempert, M. (2015) ‘Discourse and religion.’ In: Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E. and Schiffrin, D. (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2. Maldon, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 902-919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch42
Mulholland, J. (1993) A Handbook of Persuasive Tactics: A Practical Language Guide. London and New York: Routledge.
Onions, C. T. (ed.) (1996) The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Orts Llopis, M. Á., Breeze, R. and Gotti, M. (eds) (2017) Power, Persuasion and Manipulation in Specialised Genres. Providing Keys to the Rhetoric of Professional Communities. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b11481
Overstreet, L. R. (2014) Persuasive Preaching: A Biblical and Practical Guide to the Effective Use of Persuasion. Wooster: Weaver Book Company.
Perloff , R. (2010) The Dynamics of Persuasion. Communication and Attitudes in the 21 st Century. 4 th ed. New York and London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429196959-2
Petty, R. E. and Briñol, P. (2015) ‘Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes.’ Cognition and Emotion 29(1), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.967183
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G. and Wilson, D.
(2010) ‘Epistemic vigilance.’ Mind and Language 25, 359-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
Sancho-Guinda, C. (ed.) (2019) Engagement in Professional Genres. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.301
Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K. and
Albarracín, D. (2015) ‘Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal eff ectiveness
and theories.’ Psychological Bulletin 141(6), 1178-1204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729
van Dijk, T. A. (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006) ‘Discourse and manipulation.’ Discourse & Society 17(2), 359-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250
van Dijk, T. A. (2008) Discourse and Power. Basingstoke, UK and New York: Palgrave
Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3
van Leeuwen, T. (1996) ‘The representation of social actors.’ In: Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. and Coulthard, M. (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis.
London: Routledge. 32-70.
Virtanen, T. and Halmari, H. (2005) ‘Persuasion across genres: Emerging perspectives.’ In: Halmari, H. and Virtanen, T. (eds) Persuasion across Genres. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 3-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.130.03vir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2021 Martin Adam