CONTRASTIVE INTERLANGUAGE ANALYSIS OF EVIDENTIALITY IN PHD DISSERTATIONS

Mustafa Yildiz; Ümit Deniz Turan

doi:10.5817/DI2021-1-124

CONTRASTIVE INTERLANGUAGE ANALYSIS OF EVIDENTIALITY IN PHD DISSERTATIONS

Vol.14,No.1(2021)

Mustafa Yildiz Ümit Deniz Turan

https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2021-1-124

PDF

Abstract

The present study investigates evidentiality in its broadest sense (Chafe 1986) in PhD dissertations as a genre of academic writing. For this purpose, Chafe’s taxonomy (1986), revised by Ifantidou (2001), has been used as a framework in order to analyze three different groups of datasets, including one group of native speakers of English and two groups of non-native speakers: a group of Turkish speakers of English and the other non-native speakers with diff erent L1 backgrounds. The texts of these three groups are examined in order to fi nd out whether the native language of the participants is a factor in the choice of evidential markers. The results show that the native speakers of English use evidential markers more frequently compared to the non-native authors. In terms of the Native Language/Interlanguage comparison in Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis (Granger 1996, 1998), the overall use of evidentiality reveals that non-native authors do not show native-like features in the use of evidentiality. In terms of the Interlanguage/Interlanguage comparison, Turkish authors of academic texts diff er from the authors with various native language backgrounds in terms of the use of evidentiality.

Keywords:
evidentiality; epistemic modality; contrastive interlanguage analysis; academic discourse

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004) Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press.

Aksu-Koç, A. and Slobin, D. I. (1986) ‘A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish.’ In: Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (eds) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex. 159-167.

Aksu-Koç, A. (1988) The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The Case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554353

Aksu-Koç, A. (2000) ‘Some aspects of the acquisition of evidentials in Turkish.’ In: Johanson, L. and Utas, B. (eds) Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages. Berlin: de Gruyter. 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805284.15

Alonso-Almeida, F. and Cruz-Garcia, L. (2011) ‘The value of may as evidential and epistemic marker in English medical abstracts.’ Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 46(3), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10121-010-0004-7

Alonso-Almeida, F. (2015) ‘On the mitigating function of modality and evidentiality. Evidence from English and Spanish medical research papers.’ Intercultural Pragmatics 12(1), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0002

Anderson, L. B. (1986) ‘Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries.’ In: Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (eds) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood: Ablex. 273-312.

Auwera, J. and Plungian, V. (1998) ‘Modality’s semantic map.’ Linguistic Typology 2, 79-124. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79

Aydin, Ç. and Ceci, S. J. (2009) ‘Evidentiality and suggestibility: A new research venue.’ In: Fitneva, S. A. and Matsui, T. (eds) Evidentiality: A Window into Language and Cognitive Development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 79-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.251

Bednarek, M. (2006) ‘Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach.’ Text & Talk 26(6), 635-660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.027

Berlin, L. N. (2008) ‘“I think, therefore...”: Commitment in political testimony.’ Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27(4), 372-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322480

Berlin, L. N. and Prieto-Mendoza, A. (2014) ‘Evidential embellishment in political debates during US campaigns.’ Intercultural Pragmatics 11(3), 389-409. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0018

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Chafe, W. (1986) ‘Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing.’ In: Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (eds) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 261-272.

Clark, C. (2010) ‘Evidence of evidentiality in the quality press 1993 and 2005.’ Corpora 5(2), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0103

Collins, P. (2009) Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029095

Cornilie, B. (2009) ‘Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories.’ Functions of Language 16(1), 44-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor

Davis, C., Potts, C. and Speas, M. (2007) ‘The pragmatic values of evidential sentences.’ In: Gibson, M. and Friedman, T. (eds) Proceedings of SALT 17. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v17i0.2966

De Haan, F. (1999) ‘Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries.’ Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18, 83-101.

Dendale, P. and Tasmowski, L. (2001) ‘Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions.’ Journal of Pragmatics 33, 339-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00005-9

Duszak, A. (ed.) (1997) Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Vol. 104. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821048

Faller, M. T. (2002) Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Stanford: Stanford University.

Fetzer, A. (2014) ‘Foregrounding evidentiality in (English) academic discourse: Patterned co-occurrences of the sensory perception verbs seem and appear.’ Intercultural Pragmatics 11(3), 333-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0016

Fetzer, A. and Oishi, E. (2014) ‘Evidentiality in discourse.’ Intercultural Pragmatics 11(3), 321-332.

Fitneva, S. A. (2008) ‘The role of evidentiality in Bulgarian children’s reliability judgments.’ Journal of Child Language 35, 845-868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908008799

Gao, Q. (2012) ‘Interpersonal functions of epistemic modality in academic English writing.’ Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 35(3), 352-364. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2012-0026

Goddard, P. E. (1911) ‘Athapascan (Hupa).’ In: Boas, F. (ed.) Handbook of American Indian Languages. Part 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. 91-158.

Granger, S. (1996) ‘From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora.’ In: Aijmer, K., Altenberg, B. and Johansson, M. (eds) Languages in Contrast. Lund: Lund University Press. 37-51.

Granger, S. (1998) ‘The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research.’ In: Granger, S. (ed.) Learner English on Computer. NY: Longman.

Granger, S. (2015) ‘Contrastive interlanguage analysis.’ International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1), 7-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra

Hassler, G. (2015) ‘Evidentiality and the expression of speaker’s stance in Romance languages and German.’ Discourse Studies 17(2), 182-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614564522

Hedges, L. V. (1987) ‘How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science?: The empirical cumulativeness of research.’ American Psychological Association 42(2), 443-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.42.5.443

Hsieh, C. L. (2008) ‘Evidentiality in Chinese newspaper reports: Subjectivity/objectivity as a factor.’ Discourse Studies 10(2), 205-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087009

Hyland, K. (1998) ‘Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge.’ Text 18(3), 349-382. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349

Hyland, K. (2005a) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. New York: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2005b) ‘Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.’ Discourse Studies 7(2), 173-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, K. (2011) ‘Academic discourse.’ In: Hyland, K. and Paltridge, B. (eds) Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. 171-184.

Hyland, K. and Milton, J. (1997) ‘Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing.’ Journal of Second Language Writing 6(2), 183-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3

Ifantidou, E. (2001) Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.86

Ifantidou, E. (2005) ‘Pragmatics, cognition and asymmetrically acquired evidentials.’ Pragmatics 15(4), 369-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.15.4.04ifa

Jeschull, L. and Roeper, T. (2009) ‘Evidentiality vs. certainty: Do children trust their minds more than their eyes?’ In: Crawford, J., Otaki, K. and Takahashi, M. (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2008). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 107-115.

Johanson, L. (2000) ‘Turkic indirectives.’ In: Johanson, L. and Utas, B. (eds) Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, Vol. 24). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805284.61

Johanson, L. and Utas, B. (eds) (2000) Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, Vol. 24). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805284

Kim, M. S. (2005) ‘Evidentiality in achieving entitlement, objectivity, and detachment in Korean conversation.’ Discourse Studies 7(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605048768

King, R. and Nadasdi, T. (1999) The expression of evidentiality in French-English bilingual discourse. Language in Society 28, 355-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599003024

Koring, L. and De Mulder, H. (2015) ‘Understanding different sources of information: The acquisition of evidentiality.’ Journal of Child Language 42(5), 947-968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500091400052X

Koutsantoni, D. (2005) ‘Certainty across cultures: A comparison of the degree of certainty expressed by Greek and English speaking scientific authors.’ Intercultural Pragmatics 2(2), 121-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.2.121

Kreutz, H. and Harres, A. (1997) ‘Some observations on the distribution and function of hedging in German and English academic writing.’ In: Duszak, A. (ed.) Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Vol. 104. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821048.181

Lee, D. (1959) Freedom and Culture. Englewood Cliff s, NJ: Prentice Hall. Matlock, T. (1989) ‘Metaphor and the grammaticalization of evidentials.’ Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v15i0.1751

McCready, E. and Ogata, N. (2007) ‘Evidentiality, modality, and probability.’ Linguist Philos 30, 147-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-007-9017-7

Meyer, P. G. (1997) ‘Hedging strategies in written academic discourse.’ In: Markkanen, R. and Schröder, H. (eds) Hedging and Discourse. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 21-41.

Mushin, I. (2000) ‘Evidentiality and deixis in narrative retelling.’ Journal of Pragmatics 32, 927-957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00085-5

Mushin, I. (2001) Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance: Narrative Retelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.87

O’Neill, D. K. and Atance, C. M. (2000) ‘ ‘Maybe my daddy give me a big piano’: The development of children’s use of modals to express uncertainty.’ First Language 20, 29-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014272370002005802

Oztürk, Ö. (2008) Acquisition of Evidentiality and Source Monitoring. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Newark: University of Delaware.

Palmer, F. R. (2001) Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167178

Plungian, V. A. (2001) ‘The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space.’ Journal of Pragmatics 33, 349-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00006-0

Presumably. (2018) In: Oxford Learner Dictionary Online. Retrieved in January 2018 <https://www.lexico.com/definition/presumably>.

Rayson, P., Berridge, D. and Francis, B. (2004) ‘Extending the Cochran rule for the comparison of word frequencies between corpora.’ In: Purnelle, G., Fairon, C. and Dister, A. (eds) Le Poids des Mots. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data (JADT 2004), Vol. 2, Louvain-la-Neuve,
Belgium (March 10-12, 2004). Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain. 926-936.

Rayson, P. (2008) Log-likelihood and effect size calculator. Lancaster, England: Lancaster University. Available from <http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html>.

Rett, J. and Hyams, N. (2014) ‘The acquisition of syntactically encoded evidentiality.’ Language Acquisition 21(2), 173-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2014.884572

Sbisa, M. (2014) ‘Evidentiality and illocution.’ Intercultural Pragmatics 11(3), 463-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0021

Storer, N. W. (1967) ‘The hard sciences and the soft: Some sociological observations.’ Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 55, 75-84.

Vassileva, I. (1997) ‘Hedging in English and Bulgarian academic writing.’ In: Duszak, A. (ed.) Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Vol. 104. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 203-221. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821048.203

Yang, L. (2012) ‘A comparative study of evidentiality in RAs in applied linguistics written by NS and Chinese writers.’ Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 2(4), 140-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2012.24018

Yang, L. (2013) ‘Evaluative functions of reporting evidentials in English research articles of applied linguistics.’ Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 3(2), 119-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2013.32016

Yang, L. (2014) ‘Evidentiality in English research articles of applied linguistics: From the perspective of metadiscourse.’ Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5(3), 581-591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.3.581-591

Metrics