INTERPERSONALITY IN RESEARCH ARTICLE ABSTRACTS: A DIACHRONIC CASE STUDY

Jana Kozubíková Šandová

doi:10.5817/DI2021-1-77

INTERPERSONALITY IN RESEARCH ARTICLE ABSTRACTS: A DIACHRONIC CASE STUDY

Vol.14,No.1(2021)

Jana Kozubíková Šandová

https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2021-1-77

PDF

Abstract

Research article (RA) abstracts are not mere shortened versions of the research article content but constitute a separate genre of academic discourse with its own specific features, one of them being its interactional nature. This paper explores interactional metadiscourse markers occurring in RA abstracts from the diachronic perspective. The main focus is therefore on variation and change in the use of these linguistic means since it may be expected that their distribution could evolve over time, even though scholars follow specifi c writing conventions when writing RA abstracts. Connected with this is the question whether growth in the mean length of RA abstracts has led to any rhetorical change. Providing an answer to this question is another aim of this paper. The study is based on a corpus of 96 RA abstracts from the fi eld of Applied Linguistics published in a prestigious linguistic journal entitled Journal of Pragmatics over the course of the last 35 years. The theoretical framework followed here is the taxonomy of metadiscourse proposed by Hyland (2005a), which is particularly convenient as it off ers a pragmatically-grounded method of analysing interactional metadiscourse markers in academic texts. As the results suggest, the distribution of interactional metadiscourse markers has undergone diachronic changes, e.g. in the use of hedging and boosting devices, confi rming the dynamic character of this often overlooked genre of academic discourse with regard to its interpersonal aspects.

Keywords:
interpersonality; research article abstract; academic discourse; interactional metadiscourse markers

References

Ädel, A. and Mauranen, A. (2010) ‘Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives.’ Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.215

Alonso-Almeida, F. (2014) ‘Evidential and epistemic devices in English and Spanish medical, computing and legal scientific abstracts: A contrastive study.’ In: Bondi, M.and Lorés Sanz, R. (eds) Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change. Bern: Peter Lang. 21-42.

Baklouti, A. S. (2011) ‘The impact of genre and disciplinary diff erences on structural choice: Taxis in research article abstracts.’ Text & Talk 31(5), 503-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2011.025

Bhatia, V. K. (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

Bhatia, V. K. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-based View. London: Continuum.

Biber, D. (2006) ‘Stance in spoken and written university registers.’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(2), 97-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001

Bondi, M. (2014) ‘Changing voices: Authorial voice in abstracts.’ In: Bondi, M. and Lorés Sanz, R. (eds) Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change. Bern: Peter Lang. 243-270. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0701-2

Bondi, M. and Cavalieri, S. (2012) ‘The evolution of the abstract as a genre: 1988-2008. The case of applied linguistics.’ In: Garzone, G., Catenaccio, P. and Degano, C. (eds) Genre Change in the Contemporary World: Short-term Diachronic Perspective. Bern: Peter Lang. 43-55.

Crismore, A., Markkanen, R. and Steff ensen, M. S. (1993) ‘Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students.’ Written Communication 10(1), 39-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002

Gillaerts, P. (2014) ‘Shifting metadiscourse: Looking for diachrony in the abstract genre.’ In: Bondi, M. and Lorés Sanz, R. (eds) Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change. Bern: Peter Lang. 271-286.

Gillaerts, P. and van de Velde, F. (2010) ‘Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts.’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2), 128-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004

Graetz, N. (1985) ‘Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts.’ In: Elgin, J. M. and Pugh, A. K. (eds) Reading for Professional Purposes. Leuven: ACCO. 123-135.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Hyland, K. (1996) ‘Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research article.’ Applied Linguistics 17, 433-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.433

Hyland, K. (2001) ‘Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles.’ English for Specifi c Purposes 20(3), 207-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0

Hyland, K. (2004) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2005a) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2005b) ‘Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.’ Discourse Studies 7, 173-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, K. (2017) ‘Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?’ Journal of Pragmatics 113, 16-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007

Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2004) ‘Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal.’ Applied Linguistics 25, 156-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156

Hyland, K. and Jiang, K. (2018) ‘ ‘In this paper we suggest’: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse.’ English for Specific Purposes 51, 18-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001

Kaplan, R., Cantor, S., Hagstrom, C., Kamhi-Stein, L. D., Shiotani, Y. and Zimmerman, C. (1994) ‘On abstract writing.’ Text 14(3), 401-426. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1994.14.3.401

Khedri, M., Chan, S. H. and Tan, H. (2015) ‘Interpersonal-driven features in research article abstracts: Cross-disciplinary metadiscoursal perspective.’ Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 23(2), 303-314.

Lafuente-Millán, E. (2008) ‘Epistemic and approximative meaning revisited: The use of hedges, boosters and approximators when writing research in diff erent disciplines.’ In: Burgess, S. and Martín-Martín, P. (eds) English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication. Bern: Peter Lang. 65-82.

Lorés, R. (2004) ‘On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organisation.’ English for Specific Purposes 23(3), 280-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001

Lorés Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P. and Lafuente-Millán, E. (eds) (2010) Constructing Interpersonality. Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Lyda, A. and Warchal, K. (2014) ‘Gender and academicity: Insights from research article abstracts.’ In: Bondi, M. and Lorés Sanz, R. (eds) Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change. Bern: Peter Lang. 111-130.

Okamura, A. and Shaw, P. (2014) ‘Development of academic journal abstracts in relation to the demands of stakeholders.’ In: Bondi M. and Lorés Sanz, R. (eds) Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change. Bern: Peter Lang. 287-318.

Pho, P. D. (2008) ‘Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance.’ Discourse Studies 10(2), 231-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087010

Salager-Meyer, F. (1990) ‘Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research- and text-type.’ Text 10(4), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1990.10.4.365

Stotesbury, H. (2003) ‘Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences.’ Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2, 327-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00049-3

Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vande Kopple, W. (1985) ‘Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse.’ College Composition and Communication 36(1), 82-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/357609

Ventola, E. (1994) ‘Abstracts as an object of linguistic study.’ In: Čmejrková, S., Daneš, F. and Havlová, E. (eds) Writing vs. Speaking. Language, Text, Discourse, Communication. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. 333-352.

Metrics