Proximization strategies used in Covid-19 prevention discourse: An STA based analysis of official guidelines issued in Pakistan
Vol.15,No.1(2022)
This study is an attempt to highlight the proximization strategies used in the Covid-19 preventive guidelines issued by the government of Pakistan. The theory of proximization (Cap 2017) has been taken as a theoretical framework for the present study and the analysis of the selected texts is guided by the spatial-temporal-axiological (STA) model (Cap 2013b). The guidelines issued by the government of Pakistan between March 25 and May 6, 2020, for the prevention of the disease have been selected as a sample for this study as they are expected to carry governmental plans for fighting the disease and the coercive strategies that have been used in order to make people act accordingly. Just like war, the situation of the pandemic spread calls for quick proposal of coercive strategies and their presentation in a way that can get the people on board with the institutional plans. With this in mind, the sample has been descriptively analyzed for the linguistic choices that indicate the spatial, temporal, and axiological proximization of the threat (Covid-19) in the light of proximization theory (Cap 2017). The results show that there are a significant number of linguistic markers that link the disease prevention discourse with the political intervention discourse, justifying the application of proximization theory (Cap 2017) to both of them. The evidence collected during the analysis establishes that the authorities use proximization strategies in disease prevention discourse in order to add to the fear appeal which helps in soliciting unconditional and quick legitimization of the proposed plan of action against the spreading disease.
Coronavirus outbreak; Covid-19 prevention discourse; Legitimization; Proximization theory; STA model
Nosheen Irshad
National University of Modern Languages
Nosheen Irshad is Lecturer of English Linguistics and Translation Studies at the National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad, Pakistan. Her areas of interest for research include translation studies, discourse analysis, multimodality, and cross-cultural studies. She is also a research fellow at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA, where she is working on a study focused on transmodal and transnational communication.
Aragón, J. (2008) ‘Political legitimacy and democracy.’ In: Warren, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of U.S. Campaigns, Elections, and Electoral Behavior. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. 520-522.
Bilyalova, A., Gilyazeva, E. and Nurullina, A. (2019) ‘Phraseological units as a mirror of national mentality.’ Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics 10 (Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Applied Linguistics), 1-9.
Bozhenkova, N. and Bozhenkova, R. (2019) ‘Constitutive features of the Russian political discourse in ecolinguistic aspect.’ Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics 10 (Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Applied Linguistics), 117-137.
Cap, P. (2006) Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Cap, P. (2008) ‘Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse.’ Journal of Pragmatics 40(1), 17-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002.
Cap, P. (2010) ‘Axiological aspects of proximization.’ Journal of Pragmatics 42(2), 392-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.008.
Cap, P. (2011) ‘Axiological proximization.’ In: Hart, C. (ed.) Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 81-96.
Cap, P. (2013a) ‘Proximization theory and critical discourse studies: A promising connection?’ International Review of Pragmatics 5(2), 293-317.
Cap, P. (2013b) Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cap, P. (2017) The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
Chilton, P. (2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Chovanec, J. (2010) ‘Legitimation through differentiation: Discursive construction of Jacques Le Worm Chirac as an opponent to military action.’ In: Okulska, U. and Cap, P. (eds) Perspectives in Politics and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 61-82.
Covid-19 Health Advisory Platform by Ministry of National Health Services Regulations and Coordination. <https://covid.gov.pk/>. Accessed on 09 May 2020.
Dunmire, P. (2011) Projecting the Future through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fairclough, N. (2003) ‘Political correctness: The politics of culture and language.’ Discourse and Society 14(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014001927.
Grigorenko, N. V., Tsurikova, L. V., Kaliuzhnaya, E. V., Bubyreva, Z. A. and Lukyanova, E. V. (2019) ‘Abstract concepts through the lens of linguistic and extra-linguistic knowledge.’ Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics 10 (Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Applied Linguistics), 283-290.
Habermas, J. (1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hart, C. (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hartman, R. (2002) The Knowledge of Good: Critique of Axiological Reason. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Karanicolas, M. (2021) ‘Even in a pandemic, sunlight is the best disinfectant: COVID-19 and global freedom of expression.’ Oregon Review of International Law 22, 1-21.
Kopytowska, M. (2020) ‘Proximization, prosumption and salience in digital discourse: On the interface of social media communicative dynamics and the spread of populist ideologies. Critical Discourse Studies 19(2), 144-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1842774.
Kowalski, G. (2018) ‘Proximization as reception.’ Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series VII: Social Sciences and Law 11(1), 125-138.
Levenson, E. (2020, April 02) ‘Officials keep calling the coronavirus pandemic a ‘war’. Here’s why.’ Online document. Retrieved on 20 May 2020 <https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/01/us/war-on-coronavirus-attack/index.html>.
Mir, N. A. (2020, April 20) ‘Coronavirus in Pakistan’s Urdu media: God’s punishment to conspiracy to biological warfare!’ Online document. Retrieved on 19 May 2020 <https://idsa.in/idsacomments/coronavirus-pakistan-media-namir-200420>.
Noreen, N., Dil, S., Niazi, S. U. K., Naveed, I., Khan, N. U., Khan, F. K., Tabbasum, S. and Kumar, D. (2020) ‘COVID 19 pandemic & Pakistan; Limitations and gaps.’ Global Biosecurity 2(1). http://doi.org/10.31646/gbio.63.
Reyes, A. (2011) ‘Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions.’ Discourse and Society 22(6), 781-801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927.
Reza Abdi, A. B. (2018) ‘Legitimation in discourse and communication revisited: A critical view toward legitimizing identities in communication.’ International Journal of Society, Culture and Language 6(1), 86-100.
Scharpf, F. W. (1998) Interdependence and democratic legitimation. MPIfG Working Paper, 98(2). Online document. Retrieved on 07 June 2020 <http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41689>.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008) Discourse and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
van Leeuwen, T. (2007) ‘Legitimation in discourse and communication.’ Discourse and Communication 1(1), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986.
Van Rijn-van Tongeren, G. (1997) Metaphors in Medical Texts. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Vazquez, M. (2020, March 18) ‘Trump invokes Defense Production Act to expand production of hospital masks and more.’ Online document. Retrieved on 07 June 2020 <https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/18/politics/trump-defense-production-act-coronavirus/index.html>.
Wang, Y. (2019) ‘Proximization theory and the construction of international values: A case study of President Xi Jinping’s speech at the 70th session of the UN General Assembly.’ Journal of Language Teaching and Research 10(6), 1332-1340. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1006.24.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2022 Nosheen Irshad