THE REPRESENTATION OF EXPERIENCE IN UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS STUDENTS’ TEXTS: A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF MULTIMODAL MEANING MAKING RESOURCES IN MARKETING TEXTS
From the Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) standpoint, experiential meanings reflect our experience, perceptions, and consciousness. Research on experiential meaningmaking in tertiary contexts has traditionally focused on areas such as mathematics, journalism and media, science and computing, nursing, and history. This paper aims to investigate the experiential multimodal meanings in an undergraduate marketing course. The data comprised three written assignments and the tutor’s two model texts. The study employed a multidimensional approach by Alyousef (2013), which is framed by SFL (Halliday 2014) and O’Halloran’s (2005, 1998, 2008, 1999) multisemiotic framework for the analysis of semiotic codes in mathematics. The results showed that the experiential meanings in the students’ marketing plan texts were primarily construed through material processes and both explicit and implicit relational identifying processes. The findings indicated how mathematical symbolism is encoded in the multisemiotic texts, in the most economical manner, by using grammatical strategies of structural condensation. The results also noted the extent to which the different modes of meaning were integrated in the texts.
Alyousef, H. S. (2013) ‘An investigation of postgraduate Business students’ multimodal literacy and numeracy practices in Finance: A multidimensional exploration.’ Social Semiotics 23(1), 18-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2012.740204
Alyousef, H. S. (2016) ‘A multimodal discourse analysis of the textual and logical relations in marketing texts written by international undergraduate students.’ Functional Linguistics (A Springer Open Journal) 3(3), 1-29.
Alyousef, H. S. (2017) ‘A multimodal discourse analysis of textual cohesion in tertiary marketing texts written by international undergraduate students.’ In: Pelkey J. (ed.) Semiotics 2016: Archaeology of Concepts (Yearbook of the Semiotic Society of America). Charlottesville, VA: U.S.: Philosophy Documentation Center. 99-122.
Alyousef, H. S. and Alsharif A. A. (2017) ‘The experiential meaning in Saudi postgraduate Business students’ multimodal accounting texts: A multidimensional exploration.’ Australian Journal of Linguistics (AJL) 37(2), 219-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2017.1239535
Alyousef, H. S. and Mickan, P. (2016) ‘Literacy and numeracy practices in postgraduate management accounting.’ In: Fidalgo, R., Olive, T., Archer, A. and Breuer, E. O. (eds) Studies in Writing: Vol. 33, Multimodality in Higher Education. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishing. 216-240.
Baker, D., Street, B. and Tomlin, A. (2003) ‘Mathematics as social: Understanding relationships between home and school numeracy practices.’ For the Learning of Mathematics 23(3), 11-15.
Chandrasoma, R. (2007) Coping with Interdisciplinarity: Postgraduate Student Writing in Business Studies. Sydney: Faculty of Education, University of Technology.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967) ‘Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2.’ Journal of Linguistics 3(2), 199-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613
Halliday, M. A. K. (2014) Introduction to Functional Grammar. Revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
Jones, J. F. (1999) ‘From silence to talk: Cross-cultural ideas on students’ participation in academic group discussion.’ English for Specific Purposes 18(3), 243-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00059-8
Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Martinec, R. and Salway, A. (2005) ‘A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media.’ Visual Communication 4(3), 337-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205055928
O’Halloran, K. (1998) ‘Classroom discourse in mathematics: A multisemiotic analysis.’ Linguistics and Education 10(3), 359-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(99)00013-3
O’Halloran, K. (1999) ‘Towards a systemic functional analysis of multisemiotic mathematics texts.’ Semiotica 124(1-2), 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1999.124.1-2.1
O’Halloran, K. (2005) Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London: Continuum.
O’Halloran, K. (2008) ‘Mathematical and scientific forms of knowledge: A systemic functional multimodal grammatical approach.’ In: Christie, F. and Martin, J. R. (eds) Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. London: Continuum. 205-236.
Pulendran, S., Speed R. and Widing, R. (2003) ‘Marketing planning, market orientation and business performance.’ European Journal of Marketing 37(3-4), 476-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310459050
Royce, T. (2002) ‘Multimodality in the TESOL classroom: Exploring visual-verbal synergy.’ TESOL Quarterly 36(2), 191-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588330
Wood, B. M. (2013) Essential Guide to Marketing Planning. Sydney: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Zhao, S. (2010) ‘Intersemiotic relations as logogenetic patterns: Towards the restoration of the time dimension in hypertext description.’ In: Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R. (eds) New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London and New York: Continuum Int. Publishing Group. 195-218.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.