RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF INTEGRATED RESULTS AND DISCUSSION CHAPTER IN MASTER’S DISSERTATIONS ACROSS DISCIPLINES
Vol.10,No.2(2017)
Writing a dissertation is the most challenging task for students, especially the Integrated
Results and Discussion chapter. One solution would be to offer them a template of the
rhetorical flow of this chapter. However, to date, a limited number of studies have been
conducted on the rhetorical movement of this chapter. Therefore, the rhetorical units of
Integrated Results and Discussion chapters of 40 Master’s dissertations in the hard and soft
science disciplines obtained from a Malaysian local public university were investigated.
The findings indicated that this chapter focused predominantly on presenting the results
followed by commenting on them. Disciplinary variation was observed in the use of
‘referring to previous research’ and ‘making overt claims or generalizations’ which were
observed more in the dissertations in the soft sciences. Besides, ‘invalidating results’ was
found more in the dissertations in the hard sciences. To conclude, knowing the prevalent
moves may heighten the awareness of novice postgraduate students to align their writing to
the academic writing conventions. Furthermore, awareness on the disciplinary variations
of the use of certain rhetorical moves would sensitize novice writers to the preferred
disciplinary style of writing Integrated Results and Discussion chapter.
genre analysis; Master’s dissertation; rhetorical units; hard science disciplines; soft science disciplines
Al-Buainain, H. (2011) ‘Students’ writing errors in EFL: A case study.’ QNRS Repository
2011(1), 2601.
Al-Zubaidi, N. A. G. (2013) ‘Analyzing the rhetorical structure of linguistics dissertation
abstracts written by Iraqi EFL graduates.’ AL-USTATH 204/2, 1-32.
Atai, M. R. and Falah, S. (2005) ‘A contrastive genre analysis of result and discussion
sections of applied linguistic research articles written by native and non-native
English speakers with respect to evaluated entities and ascribed values.’ Retrieved
May, 2010, from http://www.paaljapan.org/ resources/proceedings/PAAL10/pdf.
Arulandu, M. (2006) A Genre Analysis of Masters and Doctoral Dissertation Introductions
in the Sciences and Social Sciences. Unpublished dissertation thesis. University Putra
Malaysia, Malaysia.
Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. N. (1995) Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary
Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bhatia, V. K. (2001) ‘Analyzing genre: Some conceptual issues.’ In: M. Hewings (ed.)
Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications. Birmingham: University
of Birmingham Press. 79-92.
Biber, D., Connor, U. and Upton, T. (2007) Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis
to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brett, P. (1994) ‘A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles.’ English for
Specific Purposes 13/1, 47-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90024-8
Dong, Y. R. (1998) ‘Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science:
Self-reports by students and their advisors from two U.S. institutions.’ English for
Specific Purposes 17/4, 369-390.
Duderstadt, J. J. (2000) ‘A choice of transformations for the 21st-century university.’ The
Chronicle of Higher Education 46, B6-B7.
Ebrahimi, F. and Chan, C. S. H. (2013) ‘Manifestation of theme as a point of departure in
the result and discussion section of academic research articles.’ Pertanika Journal of
Social Sciences & Humanities, 21/spec. November, 29-40.
Fallahi, M. and Erzi, M. (2003) ‘Genre analysis in language teaching: An investigation of
the structure of the discussion section of language-teaching-journal articles.’ Iranian
Journal of Applied Linguistics 6/1, 69-81. Retrieved from http://www.sid.ir/en/
VEWSSID/J_pdf/87620030105.pdf.
Hedges, L. V. (1987) ‘How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science? The empirical
cumulativeness of research.’ American Psychologist 42/5, 443-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.42.5.443
Holmes, R. (1997) ‘Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the
structure of RA Discussion sections in three disciplines.’ English for Specific Purposes
16/4, 321-337.
Hopkins, T. and Dudley-Evans, T. (1988) ‘A genre-based investigation of the discussion
section in articles and dissertations.’ English for Specific Purposes 7, 113-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(88)90029-4
Hyland, K. (2004) Genre and Second Language Writing. Michigan: University of
Michigan Press.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005) ‘Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles.’
English for Specific Purposes 24/3, 269-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007) ‘Writing scientific research articles in Thai and English:
Similarities and differences.’ Silpakorn University International Journal 7, 172-203.
Kennedy, G. (1998) An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London: Addison Wesley
Longman.
Li, Y. (2011) ‘A genre analysis of English and Chinese research article abstracts
in linguistics and chemistry.’ Retrieved from http://sdsu-dspace.calstate.edu/
handle/10211.10/1128.
Nwogu, K. (1997) ‘The medical research paper: Structure and functions.’ English for
Specific Purposes 16/2, 119-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
Ooi, V. (2001) ‘Investigating and teaching genres using the World Wide Web.’ In:
M. Ghadessy, Henry, A. and Roseberry, R. L. (eds) Small Corpus Studies and ELT.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 175-203.
Paltridge, B. (2002) ‘Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice
and actual practice.’ English for Specific Purposes 21/2, 125-143.
Posteguillo, S. (1999) ‘The schematic structure of computer science research articles.’
English for Specific Purposes 18/2, 139-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00001-5
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. (1996) 4th ed. Washington,
DC: American Psychological Association.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2011) ‘A structural move analysis of discussion sub-genre in
applied linguistics.’ Daco Romania, 17/2. 199-212.
Sargent, P. (1994) ‘Design science or nonscience.’ Design Studies 15/4, 389-402.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H. E. (2003) (eds) The Handbook of Discourse
Analysis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)90003-5
Stoller, F. and Robinson, M. (2013) ‘Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary
approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims.’ English for Specific Purposes
32/1, 45-57.
Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, P. (2005) ‘Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses.’
Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4/4, 307-323.
Thompson, P. (2012) ‘Thesis and dissertation writing.’ In: Paltridge, B. and Starfield, S.
(eds) Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell. 283-300.
Upton, T. and Connor, U. (2001) ‘Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the
textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre.’ English for Specific Purposes 20, 313-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00022-3
Weissberg, R. and Buker, S. (1990) ‘Writing up research: Experimental research report
writing for students of English.’ Prentice-Hall, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.
getcited.org/pub/102920611.
Yang, R. and Allison, D. (2003) ‘Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from
results to conclusions.’ English for Specific Purposes 22/4, 365-385.
Yang, R. and Edwards, C. (1995) ‘Problems and solutions for trainee teachers reading
academic articles in English.’ In: Tickoo, M. L. (ed.) Reading and Writing: Theory
into Practice (Anthology Series 35). Singapore: Regional Language Centre. 366-382.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2019 Zahra Shirian Dastjerdi, Helen Tan, Ain Nadzimah Abdullah