International law in Arctic waters: Disputes over catching snow crab in Svalbard in the broader context of the exploration of natural resources
Vol.15,No.S(2025)
CPR Special issue
The importance of fisheries in the Arctic region is on the increase as climate change results in natural resources, both biological and non-biological, becoming more accessible. Catching snow crab, which is a non-native species in the Barents Sea, has contributed to an ongoing dispute between Norway, the European Union and some other states on the status of the waters surrounding the archipelago of Svalbard and fishing rights. Disagreements among the affected states over the management of the vast ocean areas surrounding Svalbard are mainly legally grounded in a dispute over the interpretation of the Svalbard Treaty (1920) and its interrelation with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982). A question at the heart of this dispute is the extent of the rights of states to manage natural resources, especially considering developments in the international law of the sea with innovative concepts such as exclusive economic zones and the continental shelfs. This chapter examines how both international treaties apply to these complicated issues, which are at the same time impacting Arctic governance as such. The chapter links challenges identified within this legal framework with the deeper impact on the fragile Arctic environment, including the Barents Sea’s benthic ecosystem. While the right to catch snow crab may be perceived as a relatively “minor issue”, it well illustrates the complexity of the governance of the Arctic marine environment. Disputes over catching snow crab serve as a precursor of broader challenges relating to the exploration and exploitation of both living (fisheries) and non-living (oil, gas, rare earth metals) natural resources. There are wider practical consequences since the outcome of the “snow crab dispute” affects the equal access to other, arguably more profitable natural resources, including the reserves of hydrocarbons in the same waters.
international law of the sea; natural resources; Svalbard Treaty; UNCLOS; the fisheries law and policy of the EU
Barnes, R., Harrison, J. and van der Marel, E. (2020): Introduction: External aspects of the European Union common fisheries policy. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 35: 5-17. doi:10.1163/15718085-12341002
Braw, E. (2025): Russia’s newest victims may be fish, foreign policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/06/18/russia-fishing-spies-norway/
Cadec, A. (2018): Question for oral answer O-000076/2018 to the Commission. Parliamentary questions. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/O-8-2018-000076_EN.html
Conde, E., Sanchez, S. (eds.): Global Challenges in the Arctic Region.
De Pooter, H. (2020): The snow crab dispute in Svalbard. ASIL Insights, 24(4). https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/24/issue/4/snow-crab-dispute-svalbard
Di Bella, D. R. (2020): Norway just like Turkey? ICSID Arbitration/s against Norway over Svalbard’s Natural Resources: A Wider Picture. Kluwer Arbitration Blog. http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/05/15/norway-just-like-turkey-icsid-arbitration-s-against-norway-over-svalbards-natural-resources-a-wider-picture/
Drumbl, M. A, Uhlířová, K. (2021): Actors and law-making in international environmental law. In: M. Fitzmaurice, M. Brus, P. Merkouris (eds.): Research Handbook on International Environmental Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Emmerson, Ch. (2010): The Future History of the Arctic, PublicAffairs. 448 p.
Farmer, T.: Sedentary Species. UN Atlas of the Oceans. http://www.oceansatlas.org/subtopic/en/c/20/
Hansen, H. S. B. (2016): Three major challenges in managing non-native sedentary Barents Sea snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio). Marine Policy, 71: 38-43.
Henriksen, T. (2020): Snow crab in the Barents Sea: Managing a non-native species in disputed waters. Arctic Review on Law and Politics. https://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/2545/4829
Henriksen, T. (2024): The Dispute over the Geographical Application of the Svalbard Treaty: Into a New Phase, An Essay in Honor of Ted L. McDorman. Ocean Development & International Law, 55: 4
Jensen, Ø. (2020): The Svalbard Treaty and Norwegian Sovereignty. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 11: 82-107.
Jensen, Ø. (2023): Towards an Historic Svalbard Judgement in Norway’s Supreme Court. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 14: 83-85.
Kaiser, B. (2018). Snow crab saga: A story that demonstrates the complexities of climate change. https://theconversation.com/snow-crab-saga-a-story-that-demonstrates-the-complexities-of-climate-change-93092
Kavan, J., Padrtová, B. (2021): The rise and fall of Pyramiden: The story of a town in a wider geopolitical and environmental context. Polar Record, 58: e10. doi: 10.1017/S0032247422000018
Kourantidou, M., Kaiser, B. A. (2024): Rethinking user rights of profitable marine invasions: Lessons from the Norwegian Barents Snow Crab fishery. Ocean and Coastal Management, 259: 107430.
Křepelka, F.: Antarktida: představení a promýšlení práva konce světa. Právník 1/2020. (In Czech).
Kuersten, A. (2016): The Arctic Five versus the Arctic Council. Arctic Yearbook, 389-395.
Malenovský, J. (2020): Mezinárodní právo veřejné, obecná část, a poměr k jiným právním systémům. MU Brno. (In Czech).
Melchiorre, T. (2024): The European Union and the Arctic: The case of fishery. The Yearbook of Polar Law XV, 231–257: 231-232. Brill, Nijhoff.
Pedersen, T. (2006): The Svalbard continental shelf controversy: Legal disputes and political rivalries. Ocean Development & International Law, 37: 339-358.
Østhagen, A., Raspotnik, A. (2018): Crabtacular! Snow crabs on their march from Svalbard to Brussels. https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/crabtacular-snow-crabs-march-svalbard-brussels/
Raspotnik, A., Østhagen, A. (2020): How much is the fish? When foreign policy meets fishing interests in the EU’s Arctic endevour. International Relations, 35(2): 256-276. doi: 10.1177/0047117820920915
Rossi, C. R. (2017): Norway’s imperilled sovereignty claim over Svalbard’s adjacent waters. German Law Journal, 18(6): 1497-1530.
Schönfeldt, K. (2017): The Arctic in International Law and Policy. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 1 680 p.
Staalesen, A. (2020): Amid jubilant celebration at Svalbard, Norway sends strong signal it will not accept encroachment on sovereignty. https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/arctic/2020/02/amid-jubilant-celebration-svalbard-norway-sends-strong-signal-it-will-not-accept
Staalesen, A. (2020): Norway’s celebration of Svalbard Treaty was followed by ardent and coordinated response from Moscow media. https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/2020/07/norways-celebration-svalbard-treaty-was-followed-ardent-and-coordinated-response-moscow
Steenkamp, R. C. (2019): Svalbard’s ‘Snow Crab Row’ as a challenge to the common fisheries policy of the European Union. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 35(1): 1-27.
Stokke, O. S. (ed.) (2001): Governing High Seas Fisheries: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes. Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 273–301.
Tiller, R. G. (2016): The clear and present danger to the Norwegian sovereignty of the Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone: Enter the snow crab. Ocean & Coastal Management, 137: 24-33.
Tiller, R., Nyman, E. (2017): The clear and present danger to the Norwegian sovereignty of the Svalbard Fisheries Protection Zone: Enter the snow crab. Ocean & Coastal Management, 137: 24-33.
Vlček, T., Chovančík, M., Uhlířová, K. and Jirušek, M. (2024): Strained Relations in the High North: Steps-to-War Analysis of Conflict Potential in the Arctic. Europe-Asia Studies, 76(3): 289-313.
Walesa, J. (2018): EU-Norway dispute on snow crab fisheries in Svalbard. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-01-18-INT-4-291-0000_EN.html
Young, O. (2011): A peaceful Arctic. Nature, 478: 180-181.
Copyright © 2026 Kateřina Uhlířová