Ediční pravidla

Zaměření a záběr

Časopis „Geologické výzkumy na Moravě a ve Slezsku“ by měl sloužit hlavně k rychlé a konkrétní informovanosti geologické veřejnosti o tom, co dělají kolegové v oboru. S tímto úmyslem byl založen. Mělo by jít o průběžné informace a dílčí závěry. Význam tohoto periodika spočívá v publikaci hlavně dobře zpracovaných faktů a základních dat. Už tím, že jednotlivé příspěvky jsou prostorově omezeny, je zřejmé, že zde nemohou být publikovány rozsáhlé závěry a zásadní objevy, které vždy vyžadují významnější podíl diskuze.

 

Pravidla sekcí

Kenozoikum

Otevřené příspěvky | Indexované | Recenzované

Práce věnované výzkumu terciéru a kvartéru.

Zaškrtnuto Otevřené příspěvky Zaškrtnuto Indexované Zaškrtnuto Recenzované

Mezozoikum

Otevřené příspěvky | Indexované | Recenzované

Články věnované výzkumu mezozoika

Zaškrtnuto Otevřené příspěvky Zaškrtnuto Indexované Zaškrtnuto Recenzované

Paleozoikum

Otevřené příspěvky | Indexované | Recenzované

Články věnované výzkumu paleozoika (kambrium-perm).

Zaškrtnuto Otevřené příspěvky Zaškrtnuto Indexované Zaškrtnuto Recenzované

Krystalinikum

Otevřené příspěvky | Indexované | Recenzované

Články věnované výzkumu v krystaliniku.

Zaškrtnuto Otevřené příspěvky Zaškrtnuto Indexované Zaškrtnuto Recenzované

Aplikovaná geologie

Otevřené příspěvky | Indexované | Recenzované

Články věnované výzkumu v oblastech aplikované geologie (hydrogeologie, geochemie, inženýrská geologie a geotechnika, environmentalistika, užitá geofyzika a další aplikované geovědní obory)

Zaškrtnuto Otevřené příspěvky Zaškrtnuto Indexované Zaškrtnuto Recenzované

Speciální čísla

Otevřené příspěvky | Indexované | Recenzované

Sekce určená článkům ve speciálních číslech časopisu

Zaškrtnuto Otevřené příspěvky Zaškrtnuto Indexované Zaškrtnuto Recenzované
 

Recenzní řízení

Články prochází recenzí (anonymní peer review), zpravidla 2 nezávislí recenzenti, příp. další podle náročnosti tématu.

Recenzenti v několika posledních ročnících:

Mgr. Lukáš Ackermann, Ph.D.; Mgr. Jiří Adamovič, CSc.; doc. Mgr. Ondřej Bábek, Dr.; RNDr. Ivan Baráth, CSc.; RNDr. Karel Breiter, Ph.D.; prof. RNDr. Rostislav Brzobohatý, CSc.; RNDr. Miroslav Bubík, CSc.; RNDr. Petr Budil, Ph.D.; RNDr. Marcela Bukovanská, CSc.; Mgr. Stanislav Čech; Mgr. Renata Čopjaková, Ph.D.; Mgr. Petr Čoupek; RNDr. Josef Vojtěch Datel, Ph.D.; RNDr. Petr Dobeš; RNDr. Nela Doláková, CSc.; RNDr. Zdeněk Dolníček, Ph.D.; doc. Ing. Jiří Faimon, Dr.; doc. RNDr. Oldřich Fatka, CSc.; prof. RNDr. Bohuslav Fojt, CSc.; Mgr. Petr Gadas, PhD.; doc. RNDr. Miroslava Gregerová, CSc.; Mgr. Martin Hanáček; RNDr. Pavel Hanžl, Dr.; Mgr. Josef Havíř, Dr.; doc. RNDr. Jindřich Hladil, CSc.; doc. Ing. Šárka Hladilová, CSc.; doc. RNDr. Katarína Holcová, CSc.; doc. RNDr. František Holub, CSc.; RNDr. Stanislav Houzar, RNDr. Pavel Hudec; Ph.D.; Mgr. Martin Chadima, Ph.D.; RNDr. Marta Chlupáčová, CSc.; RNDr. Jaroslav Kadlec, Dr.; prof. RNDr. Jiří Kalvoda, CSc.; RNDr. Karel Kirchner, CSc.; RNDr. Martin Košťák, Ph.D.; prof. RNDr. Michal Kováč, DrSc.; RNDr. Marianna Kováčová, Ph.D.; RNDr. Oldřich Krejčí, Ph.D.; Mgr. Kamil Kropáč, Ph.D.; Mgr. Hana Krumlová, Ph.D.; Mgr. Eva Kryštofová; Mgr. Tomáš Kuchovský, Ph.D.; Mgr. Tomáš Kumpan, Ph.D.; Mgr. Lukáš Laibl; Mgr. Tomáš Lehotský, Ph.D.; doc. RNDr. Jaromír Leichmann, Dr.; Mgr. Monika Ličbinská, Ph.D.; Mgr. Lenka Lisá, Ph.D.; RNDr. Karel Malý, Ph.D.; RNDr. Lubomír Maštera, CSc.; Ing. Dalibor Matýsek, Dr.; doc. RNDr. Rostislav Melichar, Dr.; doc. RNDr. Jozef Michalík, DrSc.; prof. RNDr. Rudolf Musil, DrSc.; Ing. Radovan Nečas; doc. RNDr. Slavomír Nehyba, Dr.; prof. RNDr. Milan Novák, CSc.; doc. Mgr. Daniel Nývlt, Ph.D.; RNDr. Miriam Nývltová Fišáková, Ph.D.; doc. PhDr. Martin Oliva, Ph.D.; RNDr. Pavel Ondra; RNDr. Jiří Otava, CSc.; RNDr. Peter Pálenský; RNDr. Vratislav Pecina; Mgr. Tomáš Pecka; RNDr. Jaroslava Pertoldová, CSc.; Mgr. Jan Petřík; Mgr. Pavel Pracný; RNDr. Hana Prchálová;RNDr. Rudolf Prokop, CSc.; prof. RNDr. Antonín Přichystal, CSc.; RNDr. Josef Pšenička, Ph.D.; Mgr. Vladislav Rapprich, Ph.D.; Mgr. Jiří Rez, Ph.D.; Mgr. Martina Roblíčková; Mgr. Pavel Roštínský, Ph.D.; Mgr. Adam Říčka, Ph.D.; Mgr. Jan Sedláček, Mgr. Jiří Sejkora, Ph.D.; Ph.D.; doc. RNDr. Jaroslav Skácel, CSc.; RNDr. Zuzana Skácelová; doc. Ing. Petr Skupien, Ph.D.; Mgr. Marika Steinova; RNDr. Zdeněk Stráník, DrSc.; Ing. Pavel Šamonil, Ph.D.; Mgr. Daniel Šimíček, Ph.D.; Ing. Jan Šikula, Ph.D.; Mgr. Petr Špaček, Ph.D.; doc. Ing. Ondřej Šráček, M.Sc., Ph.D; Mgr. Veronika Štědrá; doc. RNDr. Jindřich Štelcl, CSc.; RNDr. Jan Švancara, CSc.; RNDr. Lucie Tajčmanová, Ph.D.; Mgr. Martin Valent, Ph.D.; RNDr. Václav Vávra, Ph.D.; RNDr. Josef Večeřa; Mgr. Jan Vít, Dr.; RNDr. Stanislav Vrána, CSc.; Mgr. Dalibor Všianský, Ph.D.; Dr. Jurand Wojewoda; doc. RNDr. Jiří Zachariáš, Dr.; RNDr. Jaroslav Zajíc, CSc.; doc. RNDr. Josef Zeman, CSc.; doc. RNDr. Jiří Zimák, CSc.; RNDr. Vladimír Žáček

 

Publication ethics and publication malpractice statement (EN)

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential model for our journal "Geological research".

It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher.

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Publication decisions

The editor of the GR is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.

The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of AuthorsReporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published worksWhen an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.