Susanne Kopf


This paper addresses how the Wikipedia community has debated the existence of an EU culture on a Wikipedia discussion site between 2001 and 2019. That is, a corpus of discussions among Wikipedia editors (‘Wikipedians’) was examined to shed light on how the Wikipedians involved argue for/against the idea that an overarching EU culture exists at present. This, combined with an examination of debates about concrete cultural elements associated with the EU, permits an insight into Wikipedians’ conception(s) of the union. Drawing on argumentation analysis shows that the data examined indicates that cultural commonality across EU member states is not necessarily ascribed to the EU but to their being European countries. Additionally, even Wikipedians who argue that an overarching EU culture exists do not necessarily actually subscribe to this view but argue for reference to cultural elements in the Wikipedia article on the EU in order to signal to Wikipedia readers that the EU is “more than a set of treaties”.


European Union; Wikipedia discussions; culture; nationhood; corpus-assisted discourse analysis; argumentation analysis

Full Text:


Show references Hide references An Company. (2019) The Top 500 Sites on the Web – Global. <>.

Anderson, B. R. (2016) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised ed. London: Verso.

Baker, P. (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum Discourse Series. London and New York: Continuum.

Bey, R. (2015) The UNSC Iraq War Debate: A Forum for Hegemonic and Counter Hegemonic Struggles. PhD thesis. Lancaster: Lancaster University. Online document. Accessed 5 April 2016 <>.

Bohman, J. (2004) ‘Expanding dialogue: The Internet, the public sphere and prospects for transnational democracy.’ The Sociological Review 52, 131-55. DOI:

Commission of the European communities. (2007) ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a European agenda for culture in a globalizing world.’ Online document. Accessed 9 March 2021 < /?uri=CELEX:52007DC0242&from=EN>.

Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union. (2012) Online document. Accessed 28 May 2019 <>.

Da Milano, C. (2020) ‘Audience development.’ Online document. Accessed 4 January 2018

Davies, M. (2004) ‘Collocations of “impose”.’ British National Corpus. BYU-BNC. Accessed 14 September 2017 <>.

European Union. (2008) In Wikipedia. Accessed 20 January 2020 <>.

European Union. (2016) In Wikipedia. Accessed 5 February 2016 <https://en.>.

European Union. (2017) In Wikipedia. Accessed 20 January 2020 <>.

European Union (2019) ‘The EU Motto.’ Online document. Accessed 9 April 2019 <>.

Fairclough, N. (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. 2 nd ed. Harlow, England and New York: Longman.

Gredel, E. (2017) ‘Digital discourse analysis and Wikipedia: Bridging the gap between Foucauldian discourse analysis and digital conversation analysis.’ Journal of Pragmatics 115, 99-114. DOI:

Help: Using Talk Pages. (2019) In Wikipedia. Accessed 21 January 2016 <https://>.

Jordan, W. (2014) ‘British People Trust Wikipedia More Than the News.’ Online document. Accessed 11 Janury 2016 <>.

Kienpointner, M. (2017) ‘Rhetoric and argumentation.’ In: Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London and New York: Routledge. 228-241.

Kopf, S. (2019) ‘From ‘country’ to ‘confederation’ – debating terms of reference for the EU on a Wikipedia talk page.’ In: Lutzky, U. and Nevala, M. (eds) Knowing Me and Knowing You – Reference and Identity Markers in Public Discourse. Pragmatics & Beyond Series. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 159-180.

Mederake, N. (2016) Wikipedia: Palimpseste Der Gegenwart: Text- Und Wissensverfahren Im Kollaborativen Hypertext. Germanistische Arbeiten zu Sprache und Kulturgeschichte. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Menchen-Trevino, E. and Hargittai, E. (2011) ‘ ‘Young adults’ credibility assessment of Wikipedia.’ Information, Communication & Society 14(1), 24-51. DOI:

Page, R. (2014) ‘Counter narratives and controversial crimes: The Wikipedia article for the ‘Murder of Meredith Kercher’.’ Language and Literature 23(1), 61-76. DOI:

Partington, A. (2010) ‘Modern diachronic corpus-assisted discourse studies (MD-CADS) on UK newspapers: An overview of the project.’ Corpora 5(2), 83-108.

Reisigl, M. (2014) ‘Argumentation analysis and the discourse-historical approach: A methodological framework.’ In: Hart, C. and Cap, P. (eds) Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic. 67-96.

Shore, C. (2013) Building Europe: The Cultural Politics of European Integration. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

Toulmin, S. E. (1958, 2003) The Uses of Argument. 2 nd ed. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ultan, M. Ö. (2016) ‘European cultural integration: Theories and practices.’ IJCH 2(4), 146-149. DOI:

User:[anonymised]. (2017) In Wikipedia. Accessed 15 May 2017 <[anonymised]>.

van Dijk, T. (1977) ‘Semantic macro-structures and knowledge frames in discourse comprehension.’ In: Just, M. and Carpenter. P. A. (eds) Cognitive Processes in Comprehension. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 3-32.

van Dijk, T. and Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

Wikipedia Editors Study: Results from the Editor Survey, April 2011. (2011) In Wikipedia. Unpublished manuscript, last modified November 18, 2016 <https://>.

Wikipedia: Consensus. (2019) In Wikipedia. Accessed 17 June 2019 <https://en. /wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus>.

Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. and Liebhart, K. (2009) The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Critical Discourse Analysis. 2 nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.