REFUSAL TO COMMUNICATE AS A POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE COMMUNICATION STRATEGY
Vol.11,No.1(2018)
The paper has an overall focus on the refusal to communicate, which naïve language users would often interpret as “zero communication”. This aspect of human interaction has not yet been thoroughly investigated, which accounts for the novelty of the research. The paper analyses reasons for the refusal to communicate, its types, strategies, positive and negative effects, as well as verbal and nonverbal ways of its expression. The study uses a mixed-method research design based on observation, discourse analysis and method of introspection. The material of the research includes 389 acts of refusal to communicate selected from real-life or Internet conversations, fiction of the late 20th – early 21st centuries, and films in English and in Russian. All the communicative acts are investigated along the following lines: a) reasons; b) types; c) communication strategies; d) functions and e) forms of linguistic expression of refusal to communicate. We identify regularities and classify our data within each of the devised categories. The paper argues that refusal to communicate, which in fact manifests the intention to terminate communication, is part and parcel of human interaction possessing strong pragmatic, functional and emotional value. Though it is generally seen as a negative communication strategy, this study shows that under certain circumstances it can also have a positive effect on the outcome of interaction.
refusal to communicate; “zero communication”; positive and negative strategies; verbal and non-verbal forms of expression; outcome of interaction
Bippus, A. and Daly, J. A. (1999) ‘What do people think causes stage fright? Naive Attributions about the reasons for public speaking anxiety.’ Communication Education 48, 63-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379153
Bodalev, A. A. (2011) Psihologija obshhenija [Psychology of Communication]. Moscow: Kogito centre.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burgoon, J. K. (1991) ‘Relational messages of touch, conversational distance, and posture.’ Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 15, 233-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986924
Canary, D. J., Cody, M. J. and Manusov, V. L. (1994) Interpersonal Communication. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Cloven, D. H. and Roloff, M. E. (1991) ‘Sense-making activities and interpersonal conflict: Communicative cures for the mulling blues.’ Western Journal of Speech Communication 55, 134-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319109374376
Dementjev, V. V. (2006) Neprjamaja kommunikacija i ee zhanry [Indirect Communication and its Genres]. Moscow: Gnosis.
DeVito, J. A. (2001) The Interpersonal Communication Book. New York: Longman. Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (2012) ‘Introduction.’ In: Dontcheva- Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) Discourse Interpretation: Approaches and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, ix-xiii.
Egides, A. P. (2002) Labirinty obshhenija, ili kak nauchit'sja ladit' s ljud'mi [Labyrinth of Communication, or How to Learn to Deal with People]. Moscow: ACT–Press book.
Fairclough N. (2003) Analysing Discourse. New York: Routledge.
Golovaha, E. I. and Panina, N. V. (1989) Psihologija chelovecheskogo vzaimoponimanija. [Psychology of Human Mutual Understanding]. Kiev: Politizdat.
Grice, P. (1975) ‘Logic and conversation.’ In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. 41-58.
Issers, O. S. (2008) Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoj rechi [Communicative Strategies and Tactics of Russian Speech]. Moscow: Komkniga.
Kecskes, I. (2014) Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Komlósi, L. I. (2012) ‘Linguistic context, pragmatic context, mental context: Meaning construction and interpretation via contextualization.’ In: Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. and Povolná, R. (eds) Discourse Interpretation: Approaches and Applications. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 19-38.
Kunicyna, V. N., Kazarinova, N. V. and Pogol'sha, V. M. (2001) Mezhlichnostnoe obshhenie: uchebnik dlja vuzov [Interpersonal Communication: College Textbook]. St Petersburg: Piter.
Lamykin, O. D. (2010) ‘Zashhita ot manipuljacij’ [Protection from Manipulation]. [Online]. In: Belorussian digital library. Retrieved from http://library.by/portalus/ modules/psychology/readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1288960931 &archive=1288969338&start_from=&ucat=&%3E
Lemmerman, X. (1999) Uchebnik ritoriki. Trenirovka rechi s uprazhnenijami [Book of Rhetoric. Speech Practice with Exercises]. Moscow: Interexpert.
Leontovich, O. (2014) ‘Positive communication: definition and constituent features.’ Vestnik of Volgograd State University. Vol. 2. Linguistics 5(24), 123-125.
Leontovich, O. (2002) Russkie i amerikancy: paradoksy mezhkul'turnogo obshhenija: [Russians and Americans: Paradoxes of Intercultural Communication]. Volgograd: Peremena.
McCroskey, J. C. (1997) Willingness to Communicate, Communication Apprehension, and Self-Perceived Communication Competence: Conceptualizations and Perspectives. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
McMahon, D. and Moyn, S. (2014) ‘Ideas still have consequences.’ The Chronicle Review, Feb 21, B10-B12.
Moskvin, V. P. (2008) Argumentativnaja ritorika: teoreticheskij kurs dlja filologov [Persuasive Rhetoric: Theory Course for Philologists]. Rostov-on-Don: Phenix.
Motley, M. T. and Molloy, J. L. (1994) ‘An efficacy test on a new therapy for public speaking anxiety.’ Journal of Applied Communication Research 22, 48-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889409365386
Philips, N. and Hardy, C. (2002) Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. London: Sage.
Plano Clark, V. L. and Creswell, J. W. (2008) (eds) The Mixed Methods Reader. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Ponton, D. M. and Larina, T. V. (2016) ‘Discourse analysis in the 21st century: Theory and practice.’ Russian Journal of Linguistics 20(4), 7-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2016-20-4-7-25
Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. and Teddlie, C. B. (2003) (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Ting-Toomey, S. and Chung, L. C. (2005) Understanding Intercultural Communication. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2007) ‘The study of discourse: An introduction.’ In: Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) Discourse Studies 2. London: Sage, xix- xli.
Verderber, R. and Verderber, K. (2003) Psihologija obshhenija [Psychology of Communication]. St. Petersburg: Prime-Euroznak.
Vygotskij, L. S. (2003) Osnovy defektologii: uchebnik dlja vuzov [Fundamentals of Defectology: College Textbook]. St. Petersburg: Lan’.
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. and Jackson, D. (2000) Psihologija mezhlichnostnyh kommunikacij [Psychology of Interpersonal Communication]. St. Petersburg: Rech.
Weaver II, R. L. (1996) Understanding Interpersonal Communication. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © 2019 Olga Leontovich, Marianna Gulyaeva