Central European Journal of Management https://journals.muni.cz/cejm <hr /> <h2 style="color: red;">Warning!</h2> <p>Please note that the publication of the <strong>Central European Journal of Management (CEJM)</strong> ISSN 2336-2693 (print), ISSN 2336-4890 (online) has been terminated with issue 2, 2016. The journal with the similar title <strong>Central European Management Journal (CEMJ)</strong> <a href="https://journals.kozminski.cem-j.org/index.php/pl_cemj">Central European Management Journal (cem-j.org)</a> is improperly using the ISSN of our discontinued journal and is apparently a predatory journal. They misused the name of a journal published by Kozminski University <a href="https://journals.kozminski.edu.pl/">Kozminski University Journals</a> and also published on Sciendo <a href="https://sciendo.com/journal/JMBACE">Central European Management Journal (sciendo.com)</a>, and the ISSN of our now defunct journal <a href="https://journals.muni.cz/cejm">https://journals.muni.cz/cejm</a>.</p> <p>The editors and the publisher have distanced themselves from this predatory journal.</p> <hr /> <p>The Central European Journal of Management is a scientific review journal which has been published biannually by Masaryk University in Brno since 2014. It publishes theoretical works, the results of research activities and practical applications, reviews and consultations. The publication is aimed at the issue of management in general, behavioural aspects of management and quantitative applications in management. Geographically, the journal focuses on Central Europe. Journal is indexed in Index Copernicus, BASE, EconBiz.</p> Masaryk University en-US Central European Journal of Management 2336-2693 <p>Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following points:</p><p> </p><ol start="1"><li>The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the rights for the first publication. At the same time the work is licensed under the <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_new">Creative Commons Attribution licence</a>, which allows others to use this work with the proviso that they acknowledge its author and the first publication in this journal.</li><li>Authors can enter into other, separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the version in which it was published in this journal (for example, publication in a book), with the proviso that the first publication in this journal is acknowledged.</li></ol><p> </p><p>It is both permitted and recommended that authors make their work available online (for example, on their own website) before and during the editorial processing of their article, as such an approach may lead to a productive exchange of opinions and to the published work being cited earlier and more frequently.</p> Lack of information and difficulty of implementation as the obstacles to the adoption of performance measurement systems at Czech organisations https://journals.muni.cz/cejm/article/view/8186 The paper focuses on the topical issue of adopting standardised tools for the measurement of performance, with the centre of attention being a lack of information and the difficulty of implementation. The empirical part presents insights into the perception of the above aspects by selected Czech organisations. An analysis of data collected through a quantitative survey among 331 entities, carried out by the Institute for Evaluations and Social Analyses (INESAN) in 2012, indicates that the current practice of performance measurement at organisations influences the perception of selected obstacles. Organisations that measure performance in selected areas and use selected procedures often claim they know which standardised tools are adequate for performance measurement, yet they also often perceive implementation as problematic. Conversely, the incidence of selected performance measurement issues at organisations is positively associated with the perception of both a lack of information and the perception of implementation as problematic. Hana Gruntová Kolingerová Copyright © 2018 Hana Gruntová Kolingerová https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2018-06-19 2018-06-19 3 2 10.5817/CEJM2016-2-1 Framing and Bias: A Literature Review of Recent Findings https://journals.muni.cz/cejm/article/view/7912 <p>Framing bias is an individual decision-making misconception caused by the fact that a person interprets the surrounding world according to a decision frame chosen by her or his subjective opinion. This article aims to review various kinds of factors that cause and affect framing or lead to debiasing, i.e. a decrease in the resulting framing bias. The objective of the study is carried out using a literature review that analyzes recent empirical studies. As a result, numerous factors are identified that according to the studies have an impact on framing. It transpires that four broader groups of these factors can be established – decision situation setup (amount of information, additional presentation of options), experience (knowledge, engagement), effort (attention, complexity, the amount of information to process) and demographics (gender, nationality).</p> Adriana Beratšová Kristína Krchová Nikola Gažová Michal Jirásek Copyright © 2018 Adriana Beratšová, Kristína Krchová, Nikola Gažová, Michal Jirásek https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2018-06-19 2018-06-19 3 2 10.5817/CEJM2016-2-2 The “Fall Wage Round”: Collective Bargaining as Temporary Organization https://journals.muni.cz/cejm/article/view/6211 <p>By investigating into collective bargaining in Austria, we show that bargaining - two opposing parties negotiating a deal - may take the form of a temporal organization and further, that outcomes of bargaining may significantly be affected by this. We specifically analyze the hierarchy, structure, membership, common goal and common identity of the bargaining organization, as well as its temporal and rhythmic nature. Together this establishes a temporal organization in contrast to bargaining between clearly separated parties. We discuss this as a possible explanation for the widely acknowledged success of the Austrian “Sozialpartnerschaft”.</p> Johannes Lehner Copyright © 2018 Johannes Lehner https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2018-06-19 2018-06-19 3 2 10.5817/CEJM2016-2-3