Do gender and personality traits (BFI-10) influence trust? A replication

Vol.3,No.1(2016)
Central European Journal of Management

Abstract

Trust as a concept found its way to business literature and it became a widely-used variable. Societal trust is systematically measured since 1960s. Later, it was discovered that two statements, which were used as opposite ends of dichotomous questions, are not truly opposite. The aim of this article is to investigate if gender and personality traits influence rating of these two statement. And if so, if it is possible to account for these factors and to create a robust trust indicator from these two statements after all. Big Five Inventory-10 is used to measure personality traits. Findings are that one measure of trust is significantly influenced by agreeableness, while the other is possibly influenced by neuroticism but the relationship is only borderline significant. With regards to the second goal, it is not possible to create a single trust indicator with reasonable properties even with adding personality traits into the equation. This article is a replication of a previous study. This study uses 1-5 Likert scales while the previous used 1-7 Likert scales, while all the questions/statements stayed the same. The difference is that both measures (not only the first measure) of trust were significantly influenced by agreeableness, while neuroticism had a borderline significant impact on the first, not the second measure of trust.


Keywords:
trust; personality traits; gender; empirical research; quantitative methods
References

Almond, G. and Verba, S., 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Calvo Porral, C. and Levy-Mangin, J. P., 2016. Food private label brands: the role of consumer trust on loyalty and purchase intention. British Food Journal, 118(3), 679-696. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2015-0299">https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2015-0299

Delina, R. and Drab, R., 2010. Socio-Economic Aspects of Trust Building for the Electronic Business Platforms. E&M Ekonomie a Management. 13(4), 110-122.

Krasman, J., 2014. Do my staff trust me? The influence of organizational structure on subordinate perceptions of supervisor trustworthiness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(5), 470-488. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0152">https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0152

Miller, A. and Mitamura, T., 2003. Are Surveys on Trust Untrustworthy? Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 62-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090141">https://doi.org/10.2307/3090141

Nunnally, J. C., 1978. Psychometric theory, 2nd edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Ostroy, J. M. and Starr, R., 1990. The Transaction Role of Money. In Friedman, B., Hahn, F. H. (eds.) Handbook of Monetary Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, vol. 1, 3-62.

Peralta, C. F. and Saldanha, M. F. 2014. Knowledge-centered culture and knowledge sharing: the moderator role of trust propensity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(3), 538-550. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2013-0494">https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2013-0494

Rammstedt, B. and John, O. P., 2007. Measuring Personality in One Minute or Less: A 10-Item Short Version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001

Rosenberg, M., 1956. Misanthropy and Political Ideology. American Sociological Review, 21(6), 690-695. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088419">https://doi.org/10.2307/2088419

Smith, T. W., 1997. Factors Relating to Misanthropy in Contemporary American Society. Social Science Research, 26(2), 170-196. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1997.0592">https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1997.0592

Sudzina, F., 2016. Do gender and personality traits (BFI-10) influence trust? In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of Business Economics Management and Marketing (ISCOBEMM) 2016. Brno: Masaryk University, 31-37.

Wuthnow, R., 1998. Loose Connections: Joining Together in America’s Fragmented Communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Metrics

0


786

Views

577

PDF views